| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Been there, done that. The "umbrella carrier" always requires you to
carry some minimum amount of liability on your house, cars, boats, etc. before they will issue the policy. Typically the minimums are in the range of 100 to 300K$. I have an umbrella liability policy that covers risks for which there is *no* underlying liability insurance available. I have had the same policy for over 20 years, (although the limits and premiums keep increasing), so things may be different in the current market. Suppose, for example, that I owned income producing real estate. At least in my state, many insurance companies will not write fire insurance on older rental dwellings. One that will write fire policies on 20-50 YO rentals does not offer inidividal liability insurance for houses or small multiplexes, but does offer an umbrella policy that covers not only property on which they write fire insurance but any other asset or activity as well. If I owned income producing real property in my state, had a policy like I just described, and had a 26-foot sailboat that was otherwise not insured my liability would be covered while sailing. Every situation is different, and the guy contemplating buying the "super cheap" sailboat should be sure he explores all the options. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
How to the owners obtain protection?
Buy an umbrella policy from the same company that writes fire, or go naked. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting.
I actually ran into something like this with a rental unit that my daughter bought (read me). It was built in 1920 and the insurance company that I used for our other two houses was reluctant to insure it for fire or anything else for that matter. I spent some money to rehab the house and all was well after that. Does that work the same way in your state? Later, Tom ----------- "Angling may be said to be so like the mathematics that it can never be fully learnt..." Izaak Walton "The Compleat Angler", 1653 Once a year the insurance company gives an adjustor a list of addresses insured by individual policy holders. The adjustor does a "drive-by" and takes a few polaroid shots or each property. He of course feels compelled to come up with something, somewhere, to justify his gig. Once a year the insurance company then sends out notices declaring that unless the "peeling paint on the south wall is repaired", the "leaky downspout near the back bedroom is replaced" or "the tenant removes the camping trailer parked in the side yard" coverage will terminate in 90 days. I've never been certain how paint peeling on the sunny side of the house creates an additional fire hazard, but the ins.co. has policy holders by the short hairs as there is very little competition. One winds up doing the repairs to keep the coverage, but the repairs would need to be done in any event. If I had any income property, the relationship with the insurance company would go back to the mid-70's. There might even be rumors that I enjoyed some "grandfathered" considerations not available to newcomers. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Gould 0738 wrote: Been there, done that. The "umbrella carrier" always requires you to carry some minimum amount of liability on your house, cars, boats, etc. before they will issue the policy. Typically the minimums are in the range of 100 to 300K$. I have an umbrella liability policy that covers risks for which there is *no* underlying liability insurance available. I have had the same policy for over 20 years, (although the limits and premiums keep increasing), so things may be different in the current market. Suppose, for example, that I owned income producing real estate. At least in my state, many insurance companies will not write fire insurance on older rental dwellings. One that will write fire policies on 20-50 YO rentals does not offer inidividal liability insurance for houses or small multiplexes, but does offer an umbrella policy that covers not only property on which they write fire insurance but any other asset or activity as well. If I owned income producing real property in my state, had a policy like I just described, and had a 26-foot sailboat that was otherwise not insured my liability would be covered while sailing. Every situation is different, and the guy contemplating buying the "super cheap" sailboat should be sure he explores all the options. Careful with that Chuck. "No underlying insurance AVAILABLE" doesn't mean "not available at a price you want to pay." In most cases liability coverage IS available on major risks (like watercraft) You may have to pay for OTHER coverages to get what you want, but that doesn't make the underlying "unavailable" - just "undesireable." Look very, very carefully at these issues and enlist the help of a good attorney skilled in estate-protection matters. The cost of being wrong on one of these things if something really bad happens is usually damn near everything you have (with some exceptions in places like Florida where homestead residences are judgement-proof.) -- -- Karl Denninger ) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do! http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING! http://www.spamcuda.net SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME! http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| houseboats | General | |||
| Bought a Reinel 26' | ASA | |||
| NEW Boat Profit Margins | General | |||
| rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
| Dealing with a boat fire, checking for a common cause | General | |||