On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 05:12:07 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:59:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

Joe Parsons wrote:

And while I'm at it, what leads you to believe that Chuck Gould is "buds" with
the bilious Mr. Kraus?

That is an example of an inference based on assumptions. It was not denied.

John, I *know* you can find more effective ammunition than that.

Joe Parsons


Sheesh. Most of the crap you righties post isn't worth a comment from a
razor clam. You think because no one stands up to dispute your claim
that that makes it true?

Second-best giggle of the day.

Because you used the plural, and because you left Joe's name in your follow-up,
I assume you are referring to both of us. Upon what do your base your assertion
that we are both 'righties'? What are the criteria by which you judge one to be
right or left? Do you know my position on the issues of relevance? What issues
do you consider relevant for such a judgement?

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD


You and Parsons together are about as interesting as watching a freshly
painted ceiling dry...

Beige is good, eh?

Solution is easy, Harry. Don't watch.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD