The mishandling / management of post-war Iraq is a much better issue to
pound. IMHO

I thought using WMD as "the reason" to oust Saddam was silly, and risky PR -
and said so then.
That said, I'd have supported ousting Saddam for *any* reason - real or
imagined. I just thought we could do better than "the threat of WMD's"
Hell - an assasination attempt on a POTUS was good enought for me, and good
enough for a lot of people that were horrified we didn't oust him in GW-1.

-W

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article leLDb.130513$_M.671166@attbi_s54,
says...

If the *best* the Democrats have to attack Bush with is the WMD issue,
then
the election is already over.

There's plenty more Clams, it's just one nail in the coffin that'll get
delivered to Crawford.