On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 12:02:51 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

JohnH wrote:


Your bud, Harry, has made several posts without comment on the capture of
Saddam. As yet, jps has had no comment. Wonder why? Could it be because they
can't come up wit a way to put a negative spin on it?

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD


I've commented on the capture of Saddam. It's good that he's been
captured and will be the subject of a showy trial, but I don't think it
is a big deal. He hasn't been the head of state in Iraq for what, seven
months? And it took all of Bush's horses and all of Bush's men to find him?

I doubt if a trial will be held soon. I think he will undergo some interrogation
first. Of course, many libs will say he's being mistreated, but we'll have to
live with that. I'm sure there's a bunch already complaining about his 'lice
check' being televised.

Our invasion of Iraq wasn't the equivalent of the liberation of Belgium
or even the siege and relief of Bastogne during the Battle of the Bulge.
In Iraq, we took on a fifth-rate power whose uniformed military forces
collapsed shortly after we arrived.

Tell that to the next hundred thousand about to go into mass graves.


I know you Conservatives want to make the toppling of Saddam the
greatest thing since sliced bread, but, in reality, all it is is a minor
positive blip in a sadly mistaken U.S. misadventure, one aimed at
propping up a failed US president in the popularity polls.

Well I'll be double-damned! You used the phrase "positive blip". That's the
first positive thing I've heard from you about the military, the administration,
or the USA. Times are indeed a'changing.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Wally, on the list of right wing people who seldom post anything except hate
mail to the NG, you're running a distant second to some broad from "down under"
something.

But keep it up. Practice makes perfect.
You too can become a puking fountain of stinking negativity if you put whatever
it is you use instead of a mind to it.

The difference between your perspective and mine is very simple. I believe you
have every right in the world to hold your opinions, (wrong as they are), and I
do not consider your obviously defective opinion (insert grin here) any sort of
threat to my own.

When was the last time you heard anybody on the left call you right-wingers
"traitors" or anti- American?

. Your screwed up perspective is
that you, only you, and those who think exactly like you have the only valid
opinions about how our society should run and what direction national
policies
should take.

LOL

You leftists are the only "true word", we all know that by now.

Gould 0738 wrote:

Wally, on the list of right wing people who seldom post anything except hate
mail to the NG, you're running a distant second to some broad from "down under"
something.

No one compares to your left-wing hate-monger krause.

Why is it that you liberals are such hypocrites?


When was the last time you heard anybody on the left call you right-wingers
"traitors" or anti- American?

Are you serious?

-- Charlie


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Wally, on the list of right wing people who seldom post anything except
hate
mail to the NG, you're running a distant second to some broad from "down
under"
something.

No one compares to your left-wing hate-monger krause.

Why is it that you liberals are such hypocrites?


Sometimes its important to read every word. "On the list of right wing
people....." is a clause that limits the consideration to a subgroup. That
subgroup consists of "right wing" people. I believe that "right wing" doesn't
include Harry Krause.

Harry can be exceptionally nasty. When he gets up a head of steam, he's as big
a flamer as anybody.




When was the last time you heard anybody on the left call you right-wingers
"traitors" or anti- American?



Are you serious?

-- Charlie


Darn right. You guys sit over in self-righteous heaven calling everybody who
disagrees with your perspective "traitors" and etc.

When was the last time anybody on the left called a right winger a "traitor"?
The liberal philosophy acknowledges that there can be more than one sincere
opinon, and that often times those opinions will disagree. (Don't worry- I have
no expectation that you would ever understand such a radical concept.)

"some broad" Nice turn of a phrase. Your respect for women is right
along with your partner in hate. The KrauseBot © learns well.

You know nothing about my "respect for women." Do I respect an *individual* who
makes it her life's work to personally, viciously, and continuously insult
everybody who disagrees with her. Nope. Not at all.

Do you respect the whores hanging out
on the corner? Apparently you must, if you feel all women are automatically
entitled to respect. How 'bout these nasty little pieces of work that keep
driving carloads of kids down boatramps and letting them drown? Hey, those are
women too. No fair picking and choosing, right?

Respect goes where it is earned.
I respect ladies. Some women do not act like ladies and are unworthy of
respect, as are many men who do not act like gentlemen.

I have no respect for prejudice or stupidity, regardless of gender or political
affiliation.

Gould 0738 wrote:

Harry can be exceptionally nasty. When he gets up a head of steam, he's as big
a flamer as anybody.

He a sexist piece of filth, who has said he'd enjoy watching people he
doesn't like die.





When was the last time you heard anybody on the left call you right-wingers
"traitors" or anti- American?

Are you serious?


Darn right. You guys sit over in self-righteous heaven calling everybody who
disagrees with your perspective "traitors" and etc.

I've never called anyone a traitor here. What makes you think I'm a
right-winger? Because I point out the hypocrisy of one krause and his
doggie gould? There's plenty of it on the right too, just look at your
favorite whipping boy rush.

In your blinding partisanship, you can't even stand on two legs any
more. You'd do alot for your personal credibility if you'd quit playing
fiddle to your boy krause.

-- Charlie


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Charles" wrote in message
...


Gould 0738 wrote:

Harry can be exceptionally nasty. When he gets up a head of steam, he's
as big
a flamer as anybody.

He a sexist piece of filth, who has said he'd enjoy watching people he
doesn't like die.





When was the last time you heard anybody on the left call you
right-wingers
"traitors" or anti- American?

Are you serious?


Darn right. You guys sit over in self-righteous heaven calling everybody
who
disagrees with your perspective "traitors" and etc.

I call Harry a traitor for several reasons: (a) he gloats with every bit of
bad news from the economy, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc., (b) he expresses "hope"
that the next terrorist attack hits middle America, (c) he constantly
disparages the capabilities of US troops.

Although you and I rarely agree, Gould, you *do* seem to have the best
interest of our country at heart. You're just a little bit misguided as to
the best road to follow.

NOYB wrote:

"Charles" wrote in message
...


Gould 0738 wrote:

Harry can be exceptionally nasty. When he gets up a head of steam, he's
as big
a flamer as anybody.

He a sexist piece of filth, who has said he'd enjoy watching people he
doesn't like die.





When was the last time you heard anybody on the left call you
right-wingers
"traitors" or anti- American?

Are you serious?


Darn right. You guys sit over in self-righteous heaven calling everybody
who
disagrees with your perspective "traitors" and etc.

I call Harry a traitor for several reasons: (a) he gloats with every bit of
bad news from the economy, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc.,


Not true. I simply work to pin the bad news on the tail of the chief
perpetrator...the Smirking Chimp. Nothing traitorous about expressing
displeasure over the idiocy of George W. Bush.


(b) he expresses "hope"
that the next terrorist attack hits middle America


Not true. I've stated that I hope there is not another attack, but that
if there is, that it strike "Bush Country," where the conservatives hold
forth.


(c) he constantly
disparages the capabilities of US troops.

They haven't faced a serious enemy since Vietnam. I have no reason to
believe they are capable against equal forces.



--
Email sent to is never read.