*I* am also encouraging people to defeat Bush. By your
perverted logic, that makes me a communist?

No, that makes you an asshole.

Some people who lack the mental capacity to justify their own positions get
really angry when those positions are challenged. I wonder if calling somebody
an "asshole" for being on the other side of the political fence is evidence of
anger?

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
*I* am also encouraging people to defeat Bush. By your
perverted logic, that makes me a communist?

No, that makes you an asshole.

Some people who lack the mental capacity to justify their own positions
get
really angry when those positions are challenged. I wonder if calling
somebody
an "asshole" for being on the other side of the political fence is
evidence of
anger?

It's evidence of someone who really doesn't want his nap disturbed - not for
many, many years.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Some people who lack the mental capacity to justify their own positions
get
really angry when those positions are challenged. I wonder if calling
somebody
an "asshole" for being on the other side of the political fence is
evidence of
anger?

Is it acceptable to call someone "heavin" (as in vomit) for being on the
other side of the political fence?

It does seem that you have two set of standards, one for you, and one for
everyone else.

Rush repeats some crazy BS and you become very upset. You repeat some crazy
BS and it is acceptable because the person was just asking a question.

"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:UXy6d.72301$wV.34778@attbi_s54...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Some people who lack the mental capacity to justify their own positions
get
really angry when those positions are challenged. I wonder if calling
somebody
an "asshole" for being on the other side of the political fence is
evidence of
anger?

Is it acceptable to call someone "heavin" (as in vomit) for being on the
other side of the political fence?

It does seem that you have two set of standards, one for you, and one for
everyone else.

Rush repeats some crazy BS and you become very upset. You repeat some
crazy
BS and it is acceptable because the person was just asking a question.



Everything I repeat is exquisitely sane, not crazy.

Doug Kanter wrote:
"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:UXy6d.72301$wV.34778@attbi_s54...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Some people who lack the mental capacity to justify their own positions
get
really angry when those positions are challenged. I wonder if calling
somebody
an "asshole" for being on the other side of the political fence is
evidence of
anger?

Is it acceptable to call someone "heavin" (as in vomit) for being on the
other side of the political fence?

It does seem that you have two set of standards, one for you, and one for
everyone else.

Rush repeats some crazy BS and you become very upset. You repeat some
crazy
BS and it is acceptable because the person was just asking a question.



Everything I repeat is exquisitely sane, not crazy.


Taco Heaver hopes one day to be promoted to drive-by window hander-outer
at Taco Blech.

--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?

ohh Harry for someone who says he has me filtered, you sure seem obsessed
about me.

Maybe you need a 12 step support group to help you .


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:UXy6d.72301$wV.34778@attbi_s54...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Some people who lack the mental capacity to justify their own
positions
get
really angry when those positions are challenged. I wonder if calling
somebody
an "asshole" for being on the other side of the political fence is
evidence of
anger?

Is it acceptable to call someone "heavin" (as in vomit) for being on the
other side of the political fence?

It does seem that you have two set of standards, one for you, and one
for
everyone else.

Rush repeats some crazy BS and you become very upset. You repeat some
crazy
BS and it is acceptable because the person was just asking a question.



Everything I repeat is exquisitely sane, not crazy.


Taco Heaver hopes one day to be promoted to drive-by window hander-outer
at Taco Blech.

--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a
pariah.

What, me worry?

grin, of course.


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:UXy6d.72301$wV.34778@attbi_s54...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Some people who lack the mental capacity to justify their own positions
get
really angry when those positions are challenged. I wonder if calling
somebody
an "asshole" for being on the other side of the political fence is
evidence of
anger?

Is it acceptable to call someone "heavin" (as in vomit) for being on the
other side of the political fence?

It does seem that you have two set of standards, one for you, and one for
everyone else.

Rush repeats some crazy BS and you become very upset. You repeat some
crazy
BS and it is acceptable because the person was just asking a question.



Everything I repeat is exquisitely sane, not crazy.

Rush repeats some crazy BS and you become very upset. You repeat some crazy
BS and it is acceptable because the person was just asking a question.

The party who wrote to sftt.org complaining that the Fort Lewis bookstore only
displayed pro-Bush, anti-Kerry books was making an observation that can be
easily checked out by visiting the bookstore. Hackworth asked people to do just
exactly that, as well as other on-post bookstores.
It can easily be disproven if untrue- it's a representation of a situation that
can be investigated. It hardly qualifies as "crazy BS", even if it does
challenge you view that all is right or righteous in the Republican world.

Rush Limbaugh claims that "all liberals want is a free ride at public expense
and a country where we all bend over in Muslim prayer three times a day".
That's a claim that cannot be verified, or refuted- simply spread and repeated
by his many millions of not-so-bright, primarily conservative listeners.

I think you missed my point, he asks questions that are easily verified, but
he never follows up on any of his questions to say what is the truth. If
you only ask the question and don't write a report confirming or denying the
allegation, everyone is assumed guilty just by asking the question.

If Hack was really interested in knowing the truth, he would visit a few
bookstores and ask AAFES what books they do stock. He would also ask AAFES
to respond to the allegation before posting the email from an unidentified
army wife.

If he had a summary feedback on his questions, I could not find any on his
web site.




"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Rush repeats some crazy BS and you become very upset. You repeat some
crazy
BS and it is acceptable because the person was just asking a question.

The party who wrote to sftt.org complaining that the Fort Lewis bookstore
only
displayed pro-Bush, anti-Kerry books was making an observation that can be
easily checked out by visiting the bookstore. Hackworth asked people to do
just
exactly that, as well as other on-post bookstores.
It can easily be disproven if untrue- it's a representation of a situation
that
can be investigated. It hardly qualifies as "crazy BS", even if it does
challenge you view that all is right or righteous in the Republican world.

Rush Limbaugh claims that "all liberals want is a free ride at public
expense
and a country where we all bend over in Muslim prayer three times a day".
That's a claim that cannot be verified, or refuted- simply spread and
repeated
by his many millions of not-so-bright, primarily conservative listeners.