| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bush vs. Saddam
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bush vs. Saddam
On 16 Dec 2003 03:52:09 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 13 Dec 2003 07:03:59 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message m... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... Did I miss anything? Yes. The neurotransmitters between your axons. \ Idiot. You've not given one sentence that opposes, with accuracy, anything in the original post. You asked for a difference between Saddam and Bush...and I told you that one difference is that Saddam would kill you if you were an Iraqi and posted such a question. If you don't agree with the answer, then offer a rebuttal. In absence of such, it becomes obvious that when unable to offer a reasonable response, you simply revert to name-calling. So,I take it that you haven't read the newest version of the Patriot Act? Personally, I've read it. But I didn't see in it anywhere that allows Bush to kill you simply for making your original post to this thread. If you find such a provision, please point it out. Otherwise we'll just have to assume that you were being specious with your line above and really have no legitimate rebuttal. Oh, you poor person. Here you try to come off on this newsgroup as a know it all, and then say something that stupid! You want an exact "provision" in the Patriot Act allowing Bush to kill someone for writing to a newsgroup? That is just plain stupid, Steve, and you know it. Great! You're admitting that you were stupid to mention the Patriot Act as a rebuttal to the argument that one difference between Bush and Saddam is that Saddam would kill you if you were an Iraqi and made this post and Bush wouldn't kill you as an American who made this post. But, there are many, many provisions for the detention of someone who is just *thought* to be subversive. Who knows where this detention could lead.....hmm, kinda like Saddam in Iraq, huh? The fact that you think it's "kinda like Saddam in Iraq" is proof that you're a moron who makes stupid posts without understanding a thing about what you're posting. Your understanding of politics and law is just as deficient as your understanding of physics and engines has proven to be. Steve |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bush vs. Saddam
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bush vs. Saddam
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 16 Dec 2003 03:52:09 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 13 Dec 2003 07:03:59 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message m... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... Did I miss anything? Yes. The neurotransmitters between your axons. \ Idiot. You've not given one sentence that opposes, with accuracy, anything in the original post. You asked for a difference between Saddam and Bush...and I told you that one difference is that Saddam would kill you if you were an Iraqi and posted such a question. If you don't agree with the answer, then offer a rebuttal. In absence of such, it becomes obvious that when unable to offer a reasonable response, you simply revert to name-calling. So,I take it that you haven't read the newest version of the Patriot Act? Personally, I've read it. But I didn't see in it anywhere that allows Bush to kill you simply for making your original post to this thread. If you find such a provision, please point it out. Otherwise we'll just have to assume that you were being specious with your line above and really have no legitimate rebuttal. Oh, you poor person. Here you try to come off on this newsgroup as a know it all, and then say something that stupid! You want an exact "provision" in the Patriot Act allowing Bush to kill someone for writing to a newsgroup? That is just plain stupid, Steve, and you know it. Well, then, shoe the other foot, there, Steve. Show any documentation that statest that Saddam can kill someone who is "thought to be subversive". I know, you'll come back with some long winded bull****, but without the documentation, huh? Great! You're admitting that you were stupid to mention the Patriot Act as a rebuttal to the argument that one difference between Bush and Saddam is that Saddam would kill you if you were an Iraqi and made this post and Bush wouldn't kill you as an American who made this post. But, there are many, many provisions for the detention of someone who is just *thought* to be subversive. Who knows where this detention could lead.....hmm, kinda like Saddam in Iraq, huh? The fact that you think it's "kinda like Saddam in Iraq" is proof that you're a moron who makes stupid posts without understanding a thing about what you're posting. Your understanding of politics and law is just as deficient as your understanding of physics and engines has proven to be. Steve I'll be waiting for your documentation that gives Saddam, in exact wording, just like you expect someone to gleen from the Patriot Act, the exact phrases that say that Saddam can kill someone "thought to be subversive." |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bush vs. Saddam
On 17 Dec 2003 04:13:27 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 16 Dec 2003 03:52:09 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 13 Dec 2003 07:03:59 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message m... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... Did I miss anything? Yes. The neurotransmitters between your axons. \ Idiot. You've not given one sentence that opposes, with accuracy, anything in the original post. You asked for a difference between Saddam and Bush...and I told you that one difference is that Saddam would kill you if you were an Iraqi and posted such a question. If you don't agree with the answer, then offer a rebuttal. In absence of such, it becomes obvious that when unable to offer a reasonable response, you simply revert to name-calling. So,I take it that you haven't read the newest version of the Patriot Act? Personally, I've read it. But I didn't see in it anywhere that allows Bush to kill you simply for making your original post to this thread. If you find such a provision, please point it out. Otherwise we'll just have to assume that you were being specious with your line above and really have no legitimate rebuttal. Oh, you poor person. Here you try to come off on this newsgroup as a know it all, and then say something that stupid! You want an exact "provision" in the Patriot Act allowing Bush to kill someone for writing to a newsgroup? That is just plain stupid, Steve, and you know it. Well, then, shoe the other foot, there, Steve. Show any documentation that statest that Saddam can kill someone who is "thought to be subversive". I know, you'll come back with some long winded bull****, but without the documentation, huh? Great! You're admitting that you were stupid to mention the Patriot Act as a rebuttal to the argument that one difference between Bush and Saddam is that Saddam would kill you if you were an Iraqi and made this post and Bush wouldn't kill you as an American who made this post. But, there are many, many provisions for the detention of someone who is just *thought* to be subversive. Who knows where this detention could lead.....hmm, kinda like Saddam in Iraq, huh? The fact that you think it's "kinda like Saddam in Iraq" is proof that you're a moron who makes stupid posts without understanding a thing about what you're posting. Your understanding of politics and law is just as deficient as your understanding of physics and engines has proven to be. I'll be waiting for your documentation that gives Saddam, in exact wording, just like you expect someone to gleen from the Patriot Act, the exact phrases that say that Saddam can kill someone "thought to be subversive." Since YOU are the one who insinuated that the Patriot Act gives Bush the power to kill anyone he wants just for making a post to an internet newsgroup, then YOU are the one who has to find the provision in the act that gives him that power. If you can't then you were just ****ing in the wind again, as usual. Now, on to what you're asking from me, I take it that you actually believe that when Saddam was in power, he *couldn't* just kill anyone he wanted because it would be against the law. Is that the case? If you actually believe that, you're probably the only one in the world who does. Steve |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bush vs. Saddam
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bush vs. Saddam
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Bush Quotes | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
