"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
I think the difference is that if you were an Iraqi living under Saddam,
and
you posted this, you'd be tortured to death...right after watching 50
guys
gang-rape your wife, sister, and daughter.

Are you stupid, or just trying to sound that way?

You asked "So, it started me to wondering, just what is the difference
between the Saddam regime, and the US regime?"

And I replied: "I think the difference is that if you were an Iraqi living
under Saddam, and you posted this, you'd be tortured to death...right after
watching 50 guys
gang-rape your wife, sister, and daughter."


If there was anything stupid about my response it's that I actually took the
time to give a reasonable answer to an absurd rhetorical question.

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:27:34 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"basskisser" wrote in message
. com...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
I think the difference is that if you were an Iraqi living under Saddam,
and
you posted this, you'd be tortured to death...right after watching 50
guys
gang-rape your wife, sister, and daughter.

Are you stupid, or just trying to sound that way?

You asked "So, it started me to wondering, just what is the difference
between the Saddam regime, and the US regime?"

And I replied: "I think the difference is that if you were an Iraqi living
under Saddam, and you posted this, you'd be tortured to death...right after
watching 50 guys
gang-rape your wife, sister, and daughter."


If there was anything stupid about my response it's that I actually took the
time to give a reasonable answer to an absurd rhetorical question.

Which wasn't understood by basskisser, the self-appraised 'thinker'.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

"basskisser" wrote in message

Did I miss anything?

Yes -- reality.

(basskisser) wrote in message . com...
I read an article in the local paper last night that said the US Army
command in Iraq is headquartered in one of Saddams marble and gold
leafed palaces. Living amongst the splendor and opulance of the
ruling class. So, it started me to wondering, just what is the
difference between the Saddam regime, and the US regime?

Both allow their commanding ranks to live in luxurious palaces.

Yeah, real luxurious... mortar targets. Those are the best
fortifications available, I know you would have them living out in the
street in tents, easy targets, better for election 2004.

Both use weapons of greatly superior power against poorly armed and
poorly trained insurgent forces

Wrong, Sadam used those methods against his innocent civialians.


Both put down civilian rebellion mercilessly and brutally

Both show little regard for civilian casualties including killing
women and children

You are just a ****in pussy liar here, ask anyone who has to pull the
trigger.



Both use nepotism and corruption in spreading around the wealth taken
from the nations populace and redistributed to friends and family of
the ruling elite.

Propoganda by the left for convienience sake, Clinton was the first to
use Haliburton, and then of course because they are the best, and one
of the only corps. who do what they do and have the balls to do it in
a warzone, get a clue idiot.


Both use propaganda and outright lies in diseminating information
about the war or the state of the nations affairs.

Yes, most of your posts fall into that category.


Both restrict individual liberties of the people of the nation in
regards to freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and the right to
keep and bear arms.

I hear a lot of talk and spin here, but I know of no one who has had
their library records checked yet. In fact this must be reported to
congress if it happens, and there have been no reports submitted as of
yet. And you know if it happens, you will hear about it. I don't know
of anybody who has been effected by the new rules, short of being a
little late in an airport line. If that is the worst you can find to
really complain about, you have a problem. Fact is, we are mostly
living our lives as we did before 9-11.

Did I miss anything?

Yes, you forgot to really look at the situation with an open mind and
stick to known facts instead of the usual hysterical scare tactics the
folks on your side of the fence use as the basis for your lies, get a
grip.
Scotty

(Backyard Renegade) wrote in message . com...
(basskisser) wrote in message . com...
I read an article in the local paper last night that said the US Army
command in Iraq is headquartered in one of Saddams marble and gold
leafed palaces. Living amongst the splendor and opulance of the
ruling class. So, it started me to wondering, just what is the
difference between the Saddam regime, and the US regime?

Both allow their commanding ranks to live in luxurious palaces.

Yeah, real luxurious... mortar targets. Those are the best
fortifications available, I know you would have them living out in the
street in tents, easy targets, better for election 2004.

Are you really that stupid?

Both use weapons of greatly superior power against poorly armed and
poorly trained insurgent forces

Wrong, Sadam used those methods against his innocent civialians.


Both put down civilian rebellion mercilessly and brutally

Both show little regard for civilian casualties including killing
women and children

You are just a ****in pussy liar here, ask anyone who has to pull the
trigger.

Now there is an intelligent interjection! By the way, just for the
record, you'd be a very sorry individual if you acted like that in
front of my face. You know nothing of me, so to even act like that
shows your intelligence.



Both use nepotism and corruption in spreading around the wealth taken
from the nations populace and redistributed to friends and family of
the ruling elite.

Propoganda by the left for convienience sake, Clinton was the first to
use Haliburton, and then of course because they are the best, and one
of the only corps. who do what they do and have the balls to do it in
a warzone, get a clue idiot.

Oh, horse****!! That is such a stupid claim, it's almost impossible to
reply.
Here the news today? Haliburton has over charged US, the taxpayers,
$60 million dollars. Nice huh?


Both use propaganda and outright lies in diseminating information
about the war or the state of the nations affairs.

Yes, most of your posts fall into that category.

Do you disagree that the current administration is using propaganda?
How about those WMD's that Saddam has? Where ARE they? First it was
WMD's, then it was those cardboard drones (HEEHEE), then it was, well,
he's just a bad person....


Both restrict individual liberties of the people of the nation in
regards to freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and the right to
keep and bear arms.

I hear a lot of talk and spin here, but I know of no one who has had
their library records checked yet. In fact this must be reported to
congress if it happens, and there have been no reports submitted as of
yet. And you know if it happens, you will hear about it. I don't know
of anybody who has been effected by the new rules, short of being a
little late in an airport line. If that is the worst you can find to
really complain about, you have a problem. Fact is, we are mostly
living our lives as we did before 9-11.

So, I take it, that you really haven't taken the time to research.
Read the Patriot Act II.

Yes, you forgot to really look at the situation with an open mind and
stick to known facts instead of the usual hysterical scare tactics the
folks on your side of the fence use as the basis for your lies, get a
grip.
Scotty


There all facts, there for the taking, just have to read and research
a little.

Saddam is a WMD, no ? Seems interesting that they have found already all
this anti biological prevention stuff like masks and so forth, but the
weapons have slipped by. Well, they only had months to do it in. See, the
U.S. pussy footed around with people like France and allowed them the time
to clean up the place. The WMD will be found and right before the election.
Not that he needs it but this will ensure Bush another victory.




"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
(Backyard Renegade) wrote in message
. com...
(basskisser) wrote in message
. com...
I read an article in the local paper last night that said the US Army
command in Iraq is headquartered in one of Saddams marble and gold
leafed palaces. Living amongst the splendor and opulance of the
ruling class. So, it started me to wondering, just what is the
difference between the Saddam regime, and the US regime?

Both allow their commanding ranks to live in luxurious palaces.

Yeah, real luxurious... mortar targets. Those are the best
fortifications available, I know you would have them living out in the
street in tents, easy targets, better for election 2004.

Are you really that stupid?

Both use weapons of greatly superior power against poorly armed and
poorly trained insurgent forces

Wrong, Sadam used those methods against his innocent civialians.


Both put down civilian rebellion mercilessly and brutally

Both show little regard for civilian casualties including killing
women and children

You are just a ****in pussy liar here, ask anyone who has to pull the
trigger.

Now there is an intelligent interjection! By the way, just for the
record, you'd be a very sorry individual if you acted like that in
front of my face. You know nothing of me, so to even act like that
shows your intelligence.



Both use nepotism and corruption in spreading around the wealth taken
from the nations populace and redistributed to friends and family of
the ruling elite.

Propoganda by the left for convienience sake, Clinton was the first to
use Haliburton, and then of course because they are the best, and one
of the only corps. who do what they do and have the balls to do it in
a warzone, get a clue idiot.

Oh, horse****!! That is such a stupid claim, it's almost impossible to
reply.
Here the news today? Haliburton has over charged US, the taxpayers,
$60 million dollars. Nice huh?


Both use propaganda and outright lies in diseminating information
about the war or the state of the nations affairs.

Yes, most of your posts fall into that category.

Do you disagree that the current administration is using propaganda?
How about those WMD's that Saddam has? Where ARE they? First it was
WMD's, then it was those cardboard drones (HEEHEE), then it was, well,
he's just a bad person....


Both restrict individual liberties of the people of the nation in
regards to freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and the right to
keep and bear arms.

I hear a lot of talk and spin here, but I know of no one who has had
their library records checked yet. In fact this must be reported to
congress if it happens, and there have been no reports submitted as of
yet. And you know if it happens, you will hear about it. I don't know
of anybody who has been effected by the new rules, short of being a
little late in an airport line. If that is the worst you can find to
really complain about, you have a problem. Fact is, we are mostly
living our lives as we did before 9-11.

So, I take it, that you really haven't taken the time to research.
Read the Patriot Act II.

Yes, you forgot to really look at the situation with an open mind and
stick to known facts instead of the usual hysterical scare tactics the
folks on your side of the fence use as the basis for your lies, get a
grip.
Scotty


There all facts, there for the taking, just have to read and research
a little.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

Did I miss anything?

Yes. The neurotransmitters between your axons.

"NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

Did I miss anything?

Yes. The neurotransmitters between your axons.
\
Idiot. You've not given one sentence that opposes, with accuracy,
anything in the original post.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

Did I miss anything?

Yes. The neurotransmitters between your axons.
\
Idiot. You've not given one sentence that opposes, with accuracy,
anything in the original post.

You asked for a difference between Saddam and Bush...and I told you that one
difference is that Saddam would kill you if you were an Iraqi and posted
such a question.

If you don't agree with the answer, then offer a rebuttal. In absence of
such, it becomes obvious that when unable to offer a reasonable response,
you simply revert to name-calling.

"NOYB" wrote in message m...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

Did I miss anything?

Yes. The neurotransmitters between your axons.
\
Idiot. You've not given one sentence that opposes, with accuracy,
anything in the original post.

You asked for a difference between Saddam and Bush...and I told you that one
difference is that Saddam would kill you if you were an Iraqi and posted
such a question.

If you don't agree with the answer, then offer a rebuttal. In absence of
such, it becomes obvious that when unable to offer a reasonable response,
you simply revert to name-calling.

So,I take it that you haven't read the newest version of the Patriot Act?