Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Krause wrote:
John Gaquin wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message ....Sometimes I type faster than I think.... Gee, ten minutes and no rejoinder from Harry! I would have thought he would jump on that line real fast! The real question is why didn't you and some other members of the Konservatrash element jump on Dave for his belief that those who are sick and impoverished should be left out to die, because society would be better off without them. Then you tell me what good come to society by helping them? Tell me again what good comes from continually propping up people who aren't willing to help themselves. Is our standard of living better or worse when their is a large drain on it from unproductive people. Explain it Harry, if you can. But remember, any defense that you come up with which relies on "compassion" or similar "feeling", becomes subjective. So try to stick to the facts. Wait...wait...I have it. You guys think George W. Bush is a bright and competent fellow, instead of, arguably, one of the dumbest, if not *the* dumbest man to ever hold that office. Since you actually believe that, I suppose Dave's thoughts on leaving the poor out to die don't faze you. Maybe because it makes more sense, from a purely logical standpoint. Dave |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Hall wrote:
Harry Krause wrote: John Gaquin wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message ....Sometimes I type faster than I think.... Gee, ten minutes and no rejoinder from Harry! I would have thought he would jump on that line real fast! The real question is why didn't you and some other members of the Konservatrash element jump on Dave for his belief that those who are sick and impoverished should be left out to die, because society would be better off without them. Then you tell me what good come to society by helping them? Tell me again what good comes from continually propping up people who aren't willing to help themselves. Is our standard of living better or worse when their is a large drain on it from unproductive people. I'm far more concerned about the danger to civilized society that results from dumbfoch thinking like yours. You're garbage. -- Email sent to is never read. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Krause wrote:
Dave Hall wrote: Harry Krause wrote: John Gaquin wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message ....Sometimes I type faster than I think.... Gee, ten minutes and no rejoinder from Harry! I would have thought he would jump on that line real fast! The real question is why didn't you and some other members of the Konservatrash element jump on Dave for his belief that those who are sick and impoverished should be left out to die, because society would be better off without them. Then you tell me what good come to society by helping them? Tell me again what good comes from continually propping up people who aren't willing to help themselves. Is our standard of living better or worse when their is a large drain on it from unproductive people. I'm far more concerned about the danger to civilized society that results from dumbfoch thinking like yours. You're garbage. And you're incapable of forming a rational thought, which isn't heavily biased by either emotion or partisan myopia. You have yet to substantiate exactly why my thinking is "dumbfoch". Your personal opinion of it is just that..... Dave |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Hall wrote:
Harry Krause wrote: Dave Hall wrote: Harry Krause wrote: John Gaquin wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message ....Sometimes I type faster than I think.... Gee, ten minutes and no rejoinder from Harry! I would have thought he would jump on that line real fast! The real question is why didn't you and some other members of the Konservatrash element jump on Dave for his belief that those who are sick and impoverished should be left out to die, because society would be better off without them. Then you tell me what good come to society by helping them? Tell me again what good comes from continually propping up people who aren't willing to help themselves. Is our standard of living better or worse when their is a large drain on it from unproductive people. I'm far more concerned about the danger to civilized society that results from dumbfoch thinking like yours. You're garbage. And you're incapable of forming a rational thought, which isn't heavily biased by either emotion or partisan myopia. You have yet to substantiate exactly why my thinking is "dumbfoch". Your personal opinion of it is just that..... Dave There's nothing to discuss with you, Dave. You and your ideas about the poor and sick are pure crap. Your life is based upon selfishness. Why should I give a rat's butt what other low-life ideas you hold? -- Email sent to is never read. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Krause wrote:
Dave Hall wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Dave Hall wrote: Harry Krause wrote: John Gaquin wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message ....Sometimes I type faster than I think.... Gee, ten minutes and no rejoinder from Harry! I would have thought he would jump on that line real fast! The real question is why didn't you and some other members of the Konservatrash element jump on Dave for his belief that those who are sick and impoverished should be left out to die, because society would be better off without them. Then you tell me what good come to society by helping them? Tell me again what good comes from continually propping up people who aren't willing to help themselves. Is our standard of living better or worse when their is a large drain on it from unproductive people. I'm far more concerned about the danger to civilized society that results from dumbfoch thinking like yours. You're garbage. And you're incapable of forming a rational thought, which isn't heavily biased by either emotion or partisan myopia. You have yet to substantiate exactly why my thinking is "dumbfoch". Your personal opinion of it is just that..... Dave There's nothing to discuss with you, Dave. You and your ideas about the poor and sick are pure crap. Your life is based upon selfishness. Why should I give a rat's butt what other low-life ideas you hold? And that makes you as "dumfoch". See how it works? Dave |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|