Mad Dog Dave wrote:

Dave Hall wrote in message ...
Jack Meholf wrote:

It looks to me that Harry is obsessed with Wally, NOYN and Karen.


No, Harry is just one of those guys, who can't debate on an issue or
idealogical level, so he does the only thing he can, and that's to throw
insults (bad ones at that).


Dave

Looks to me like your nemesis Harry is the Alpha Male in here since he
gets attacked the most and brushes it all off with a twinkle.


Hardly. Harry is one of those guys who interjects emotional and
subjective opinionated tripe into an otherwise engaging discussion about
issues. What he *thinks* or *feels* about something is irrelevant, when
it does not relate to the facts.

He *thinks* GWB is dumb and a liar, so we all should, regardless of the
fact that he can not provide ONE piece of substantive proof to back up
his allegations.

THAT is why I have no respect for him. He's nothing more than a
name-caller and mud slinger.

Dave

Dave Hall wrote:

Mad Dog Dave wrote:

Dave Hall wrote in message ...
Jack Meholf wrote:

It looks to me that Harry is obsessed with Wally, NOYN and Karen.


No, Harry is just one of those guys, who can't debate on an issue or
idealogical level, so he does the only thing he can, and that's to throw
insults (bad ones at that).


Dave

Looks to me like your nemesis Harry is the Alpha Male in here since he
gets attacked the most and brushes it all off with a twinkle.


Hardly. Harry is one of those guys who interjects emotional and
subjective opinionated tripe into an otherwise engaging discussion


An engaging discussion about issues with you? To what end? So some of
the horrible smelling crap that covers you will splash onto me? Sorry,
bub, but your posit that the sick and poor should be left to die means
that *nothing* you say about anything is worth a discussion.





--
Email sent to is never read.

Harry Krause wrote:

Dave Hall wrote:

Mad Dog Dave wrote:

Dave Hall wrote in message ...
Jack Meholf wrote:

It looks to me that Harry is obsessed with Wally, NOYN and Karen.


No, Harry is just one of those guys, who can't debate on an issue or
idealogical level, so he does the only thing he can, and that's to throw
insults (bad ones at that).


Dave

Looks to me like your nemesis Harry is the Alpha Male in here since he
gets attacked the most and brushes it all off with a twinkle.


Hardly. Harry is one of those guys who interjects emotional and
subjective opinionated tripe into an otherwise engaging discussion

An engaging discussion about issues with you? To what end?

To find out who is more capable of rational discussion of the true
issues, without getting bogged down in an endless banter of opinion,
fueled primarily by feelings over logic.


So some of
the horrible smelling crap that covers you will splash onto me?

You wallow in enough of your own horribly smelling crap. A little extra
from me would be superfluous.


Sorry,
bub, but your posit that the sick and poor should be left to die means
that *nothing* you say about anything is worth a discussion.

I take then, that in your years of liberal arts education, you never
studied the theory of evolution, and what drives it?

Tell me then, other than emotionally driven compassion, what logical
reason is there to save something that would die if left to its own
devices?

Dave

Dave Hall wrote in message
Sorry,
bub, but your posit that the sick and poor should be left to die means
that *nothing* you say about anything is worth a discussion.

I take then, that in your years of liberal arts education, you never
studied the theory of evolution, and what drives it?

Tell me then, other than emotionally driven compassion, what logical
reason is there to save something that would die if left to its own
devices?

Dave

That's pretty simple, there, Dave. Let's use YOUR argument above. It's
evolution. You see, we've evolved more than other species. At least
SOME of us. Some of us have this thing called intellect. We have
evolved to learn to care, to nurture, to have emotions, ie: to love.
Again, I know that not all of the species has evolved at the same
rate.

basskisser wrote:

Dave Hall wrote in message
Sorry,
bub, but your posit that the sick and poor should be left to die means
that *nothing* you say about anything is worth a discussion.

I take then, that in your years of liberal arts education, you never
studied the theory of evolution, and what drives it?

Tell me then, other than emotionally driven compassion, what logical
reason is there to save something that would die if left to its own
devices?

Dave

That's pretty simple, there, Dave. Let's use YOUR argument above. It's
evolution. You see, we've evolved more than other species. At least
SOME of us. Some of us have this thing called intellect. We have
evolved to learn to care, to nurture, to have emotions, ie: to love.
Again, I know that not all of the species has evolved at the same
rate.


Emotions are irrelevant. Having the same, is not necessarily a sign of
evolution.
Those same "feelings" are why many people make the concious choice to
not make something productive of themselves. Is laziness a trait worthy
of evolution? As long as there are people who fall into the compassion
trap, there will always be people who are more than willing to take
advantage of it.

Dave

Dave Hall wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

Dave Hall wrote:

Mad Dog Dave wrote:

Dave Hall wrote in message ...
Jack Meholf wrote:

It looks to me that Harry is obsessed with Wally, NOYN and Karen.


No, Harry is just one of those guys, who can't debate on an issue or
idealogical level, so he does the only thing he can, and that's to throw
insults (bad ones at that).


Dave

Looks to me like your nemesis Harry is the Alpha Male in here since he
gets attacked the most and brushes it all off with a twinkle.


Hardly. Harry is one of those guys who interjects emotional and
subjective opinionated tripe into an otherwise engaging discussion

An engaging discussion about issues with you? To what end?

To find out who is more capable of rational discussion of the true
issues, without getting bogged down in an endless banter of opinion,
fueled primarily by feelings over logic.


So some of
the horrible smelling crap that covers you will splash onto me?

You wallow in enough of your own horribly smelling crap. A little extra
from me would be superfluous.


Sorry,
bub, but your posit that the sick and poor should be left to die means
that *nothing* you say about anything is worth a discussion.

I take then, that in your years of liberal arts education, you never
studied the theory of evolution, and what drives it?

Tell me then, other than emotionally driven compassion, what logical
reason is there to save something that would die if left to its own
devices?

Dave



What logical reason is there for you to exist at all? You're just taking
up space and using up resources that other, more capable people need.


--
Email sent to is never read.

Harry Krause wrote:

Dave Hall wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

Dave Hall wrote:

Mad Dog Dave wrote:

Dave Hall wrote in message ...
Jack Meholf wrote:

It looks to me that Harry is obsessed with Wally, NOYN and Karen.


No, Harry is just one of those guys, who can't debate on an issue or
idealogical level, so he does the only thing he can, and that's to throw
insults (bad ones at that).


Dave

Looks to me like your nemesis Harry is the Alpha Male in here since he
gets attacked the most and brushes it all off with a twinkle.


Hardly. Harry is one of those guys who interjects emotional and
subjective opinionated tripe into an otherwise engaging discussion

An engaging discussion about issues with you? To what end?

To find out who is more capable of rational discussion of the true
issues, without getting bogged down in an endless banter of opinion,
fueled primarily by feelings over logic.


So some of
the horrible smelling crap that covers you will splash onto me?

You wallow in enough of your own horribly smelling crap. A little extra
from me would be superfluous.


Sorry,
bub, but your posit that the sick and poor should be left to die means
that *nothing* you say about anything is worth a discussion.

I take then, that in your years of liberal arts education, you never
studied the theory of evolution, and what drives it?

Tell me then, other than emotionally driven compassion, what logical
reason is there to save something that would die if left to its own
devices?

Dave



What logical reason is there for you to exist at all? You're just taking
up space and using up resources that other, more capable people need.


I didn't think you would be capable of making a valid comeback. You
really are an intellectual lightweight, despite your self aggrandizing
buffoonery.

Dave