"Dave Hall" wrote in message

....Sometimes I type faster than I think....

Gee, ten minutes and no rejoinder from Harry! I would have thought he would
jump on that line real fast!

"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"Dave Hall" wrote in message

....Sometimes I type faster than I think....

Gee, ten minutes and no rejoinder from Harry! I would have thought he
would
jump on that line real fast!


I think he's busy trying to secure a high volume contract for cheap
cigarettes.

"Joe" wrote in message news:dQ2Cb.659

I think he's busy trying to secure a high volume contract for cheap
cigarettes.

But only from a union shop....... :-)

John Gaquin wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message

....Sometimes I type faster than I think....

Gee, ten minutes and no rejoinder from Harry! I would have thought he would
jump on that line real fast!



The real question is why didn't you and some other members of the
Konservatrash element jump on Dave for his belief that those who are
sick and impoverished should be left out to die, because society would
be better off without them.

Wait...wait...I have it. You guys think George W. Bush is a bright and
competent fellow, instead of, arguably, one of the dumbest, if not *the*
dumbest man to ever hold that office.

Since you actually believe that, I suppose Dave's thoughts on leaving
the poor out to die don't faze you.

--
Email sent to is never read.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

The real question is why didn't you and some other members of the
Konservatrash element jump on Dave for his belief that those who are
sick and impoverished should be left out to die, because society would
be better off without them.

?????

I never saw such a post. I saw reference to some sentiment like it, but
never the actual post. Can you give me a reference?

John Gaquin wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

The real question is why didn't you and some other members of the
Konservatrash element jump on Dave for his belief that those who are
sick and impoverished should be left out to die, because society would
be better off without them.

?????

I never saw such a post. I saw reference to some sentiment like it, but
never the actual post. Can you give me a reference?





Give you a reference? No, John, I didn't save Dave Hall's obnoxious
post. But he made it, and several people here commented on it.

It's one of the reasons why I believe there is no purpose served
"engaging" right-wing trash in discussion. What's the point, where you
have an ass like Dave Hall who thinks if you are poor and sick, you
should just crawl somewhere and die.

Is it a sentiment you embrace, John? What do you think of people who
believe it best for those who are sick and poor to just wander off and die?






--
Email sent to is never read.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:brbav2


Give you a reference? No, John, I didn't save Dave Hall's obnoxious

Yes, I'd simply like to read the actual words he wrote. Do you recall the
thread title? I've never been effective at digging out specific messages
with google.

Harry Krause wrote:

It's one of the reasons why I believe there is no purpose served
"engaging" right-wing trash in discussion. What's the point, where you
have an ass like Dave Hall who thinks if you are poor and sick, you
should just crawl somewhere and die.

How is this different from wishing that someone who disagrees with you
would get run over by a bus so you could stand and watch the person die?

Are we to conclude that liberals are all like you in that they wish
those who oppose them dead?

-- Charlie


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Harry Krause wrote:

John Gaquin wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

The real question is why didn't you and some other members of the
Konservatrash element jump on Dave for his belief that those who are
sick and impoverished should be left out to die, because society would
be better off without them.

?????

I never saw such a post. I saw reference to some sentiment like it, but
never the actual post. Can you give me a reference?


Give you a reference? No, John, I didn't save Dave Hall's obnoxious
post. But he made it, and several people here commented on it.

It's one of the reasons why I believe there is no purpose served
"engaging" right-wing trash in discussion. What's the point, where you
have an ass like Dave Hall who thinks if you are poor and sick, you
should just crawl somewhere and die.

If you are unwilling to provide for yourself, then it should not be
society's place to take up the slack for your failings.

I'm waiting for you to prove otherwise.

Dave

Harry Krause wrote:


The real question is why didn't you and some other members of the
Konservatrash element jump on Dave for his belief that those who are
sick and impoverished should be left out to die, because society would
be better off without them.

How is this different from your wish that someone in this newsgroup
would get run over by a bus so you could stand by and watch the person die?

Are you mentally ill?

-- Charlie


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---