| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c3dhc2g=.78954f52b57a82695192ae4be1fca2a9@107 0908131.cotse.net... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Here's a short and now out of date list of the lies of Bush and his administration about one subject...WMD: We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons -- the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have. George W. Bush Radio Address February 8, 2003 Iraqi officer admits to be source of 45-minute WMD attack claim: paper www.chinaview.cn 2003-12-07 18:31:33 LONDON, Dec. 7 (Xinhuanet) -- An Iraqi military officer has admitted that he was the source of the claim on Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction attack that led to a British scientist's apparent suicide, the Sunday Telegraph newspaper reported. According to the paper, Lt. Col. al-Dabbagh, who commanded a front-line unit during the build-up to the US-led war against Iraq,has revealed how he passed top secret information to British intelligence warning that the Iraqi former regime had deployed weapons of mass destruction (WMD) that could be used on the battlefield against coalition troops in less than 45 minutes. "I am the one responsible for providing this information," the 40-year old former head of an Iraqi air defense unit in the western desert, told the paper in an exclusive interview. Yeah, right. After six months of 1400 inspectors and 130,000 troops looking for WMD, an Iraqi colonel comes forward to say Iraq had WMD. No. Read it again. The Colonel was the source cited by Bush and Blair who claimed that the generals were given orders before the war to launch WMD's. You say Bush is lying. Well, he was going on info from guys like this colonel. There's a few problems with this tale: First, the Colonel's interview is presented in the dark - I guess we have to take his word for it that he is a Colonel from Iraq and not a farmer from Montana. Second, according to the Colonel, Saddam had given the order to use the weapons if things got desperate. I guess every single Iraqi officer who had the weapons made the same decision at the same time and decided to hide rather than use the weapons. No small coincidence since they were all risking death if caught and there could not have been communication between every Iraqi officer during the war. Third, the Colonel fed expatriot Iraqis with the same information which they passed on to the U.S. Where are these Iraqi's now? They are on the governing council. No conflict of interest there. Fourth, not the Colonel nor any Iraqi officer is able to show where these large WMD caches are hidden. Nor can they identify a single member of the Republican Guard who may know where the WMD are hidden. Fifth, Colonel wants us to believe that all the Iraqi officers who had the WMD were really really good at hiding things since none of the caches have been located. Sixth, the Colonel says the weapons must have been chemical weapons because they were all given gas masks. That is his evidence - given gas masks so the explosives must have been chemical weapons. The "Colonel" probably was Sean Hannity doing a bad impression of a New York taxi driver. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/20...nt_1218017.htm |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| OT--Economy Grows at Fastest Pace Since 1984 | General | |||
| FA: Pre-Spaced, Custom Registration Numbers | General | |||
| Link to amazing Hurricane Isabel animation | General | |||