Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug,
I believe that American law has always held that the punishment should fit the crime. Are you saying that if you were to be going under the bridge too fast and creating a SMALL wake, (and I think it's up to the officer's judgment as to what constitutes a wake), if he were to find you to be creating a wake where you shouldn't, you wouldn't object to paying $27,500 for the mistake? The law may very well be the law, but that don't make it right. Now on the other hand, if you owned a mega million dollar shipping company and your skippers were blasting through there creating a gigantic wake to make you more money by saving time, than a $27,500 fine might not be enough. Paul "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... I'm familiar with the Sanibel Causeway. If you read the article, the Coast Guard talks about the safety of the boaters. They're concerned "chunks could fall off and hit the boaters". The chunks they are talking about are mostly from the overhead span, not the support polls. Waves aren't responsible for that...a combination of environmental conditions, and the multitude of dump trucks, construction vehicle traffic, delivery trucks, and passenger cars are responsible. Here's a crazy analogy: On the road, when you approach places where there are suddenly a higher number of variables to watch for (like intersections), the painted line is usually solid, which suggests that you shouldn't pass or change lanes. This is a good idea. While it may not always be true that the passage under a bridge is narrower than the channel which leads up to it, it still seems like a good idea for boats to slow down because there are more variables to be concerned with, specifically bridge supports and boats which are suddenly closer to you. Maybe even fishing lines which could result in YOU getting a large hook in your face. The amount of the fine is logically irrelevant. Would someone go SLOWER if they agreed with a $100 fine, but faster if they disagreed with a $27,500 fine? :-) The law is the law, regardless of the fine. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OMC 225 idles fine in Neutral, stalls in gear. Why? | General |