See link below. (FL. msnbc news)
http://www.msnbc.com/local/wbbh/ifyourefinc.asp
JK

Typical government bully tactics!

Florida Keyz wrote:

Typical government bully tactics!

I take it you are not serious.

Boaters are responsible for their wake. In the
same way and to the same degree that hunters are
responsible for their bullets.

DSK

(Florida Keyz) wrote in message ...
Typical government bully tactics!

Bully tactics??
Let's see, you don't want higher taxes, right?
But you DO want nice roads to drive your car on, right?
And I assume you want safe bridges, so you don't have to worry when
you come to one, whether or not it will withstand your vehicle going
over it, right?

So, how would you suggest that the infrastructure, aging, and being
destroyed by wakes should be fixed?

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
(Florida Keyz) wrote in message
...
Typical government bully tactics!

Bully tactics??
Let's see, you don't want higher taxes, right?
But you DO want nice roads to drive your car on, right?
And I assume you want safe bridges, so you don't have to worry when
you come to one, whether or not it will withstand your vehicle going
over it, right?

So, how would you suggest that the infrastructure, aging, and being
destroyed by wakes should be fixed?

Probably with someone else's money. And, he'd probably like a free limo ride
to the town hall each week so he can bitch when the bridge is finally closed
for replacement.

Tolls. It's already a toll bridge. Just up the toll charge.


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
(Florida Keyz) wrote in message
...
Typical government bully tactics!

Bully tactics??
Let's see, you don't want higher taxes, right?
But you DO want nice roads to drive your car on, right?
And I assume you want safe bridges, so you don't have to worry when
you come to one, whether or not it will withstand your vehicle going
over it, right?

So, how would you suggest that the infrastructure, aging, and being
destroyed by wakes should be fixed?

Really? If you failed to slow down , because you did not know, would you think
that $27,000 was NOT out of line?

If so, come on down, I have a nice piece of Florida Keys property for you to
buy.

Sterling

Florida Keyz wrote:

Really? If you failed to slow down , because you did not know, would you think
that $27,000 was NOT out of line?

Since I know, and am take responsibility for my actions, I don't think a $27K fine
for excessive wake is out of line.

Would you advocate that any person simply get a gun and shoot it in a random
direction, completely ignorant where the bullet will end up? This seems to be a
close parallel to many peoples attitude about their wakes.

Fair Skies
Doug King

(Florida Keyz) wrote in message ...
Really? If you failed to slow down , because you did not know, would you think
that $27,000 was NOT out of line?

If so, come on down, I have a nice piece of Florida Keys property for you to
buy.

Sterling

Uh, that's why they have signs, and laws. Ignorance of the law is not
a viable excuse.

"NOYB" wrote in message nk.net...
Tolls. It's already a toll bridge. Just up the toll charge.


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
(Florida Keyz) wrote in message
...
Typical government bully tactics!

Bully tactics??
Let's see, you don't want higher taxes, right?
But you DO want nice roads to drive your car on, right?
And I assume you want safe bridges, so you don't have to worry when
you come to one, whether or not it will withstand your vehicle going
over it, right?

So, how would you suggest that the infrastructure, aging, and being
destroyed by wakes should be fixed?


Wow, I thought you were a die hard conservative. You want to do
something as liberal as have everyone who uses the bridge pay for the
idiots that don't read the no wake signs, or are ignorant of the
law??? You may be more liberal than I am!!!!