BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Kerry still refuses to release pertinent records (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/21900-re-kerry-still-refuses-release-pertinent-records.html)

Harry Krause August 26th 04 01:55 AM

Curtis CCR wrote:

DSK wrote in message ...

They make Nixon look like a blabbermouth.


How hard could that be. Nixon was a blabbermouth that recorded a lot
of his balbbering.


So was LBJ. There seem to be lifetimes of his recorded conversations
with folks in his office and on the phones...they go on and on and on...



--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

NOYB August 26th 04 02:01 AM


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of

freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the

founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of

taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow

job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To others,

it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the

same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument

that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled

that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured

it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the

people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old

when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander

Butterfield
are. LOL


Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon

tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that in

5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.


Anal.



Harry Krause August 26th 04 02:03 AM

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of

freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the

founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of

taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow

job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To others,

it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the

same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument

that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled

that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured

it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the

people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old

when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon

tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that in

5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.


Anal.




Hey...I tried to get you to look up something...but you didn't take the
bait.



--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

jim-- August 26th 04 02:05 AM


"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of
freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the
founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of
taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow
job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument
that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled
that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured
it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the
people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old
when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon
tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.


I would venture any amount of money against your 36 foot custom made
lobster boat that her name is indeed Rose Mary Woods.

The problem is that you do not own a 36 foot custom made lobster boat.

So I will put up $200,000 against your 25 footer...certainly far more than
it is worth....against your claim that there was not a Rose Mary Woods
related to the Nixon scandal vs. your claim of a Rose Mary Wood.

What say you skipper?

In the mood or will you back out of this one also?

Eh?

I see you have been on the board for some time as you have responded to
several posts well after I posted this one.

So I will ask again.....What say you Krause to my bet?



NOYB August 26th 04 02:08 AM


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of

freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the

founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of

taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow

job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that

a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To

others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan

(the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous

manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a

well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument

that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled

that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't

figured
it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and

activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the

people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old

when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon

tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that

in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.


Anal.




Hey...I tried to get you to look up something...but you didn't take the
bait.


Nice swerve.



NOYB August 26th 04 02:10 AM


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of

freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the

founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of

taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow

job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that

a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To

others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan

(the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous

manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a

well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument

that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled

that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't

figured
it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and

activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the

people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old

when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon

tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that

in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.


Anal.




Hey...I tried to get you to look up something...but you didn't take the
bait.


Why (and how) did you delete your original post that claimed it was "Wood"
not "Woods"?



jim-- August 26th 04 02:20 AM


"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of
freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the
founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven
witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of
taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow
job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that

a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To

others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan

(the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous

manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a

well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my
argument
that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge
ruled
that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't

figured
it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and

activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the
people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years
old
when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon
tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct
that

in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.


Anal.




Hey...I tried to get you to look up something...but you didn't take the
bait.


Why (and how) did you delete your original post that claimed it was "Wood"
not "Woods"?



Because he was wrong but not man enough to admit it.

Pretty telling.




DSK August 26th 04 02:45 AM

They make Nixon look like a blabbermouth.


Curtis CCR wrote:
How hard could that be. Nixon was a blabbermouth that recorded a lot
of his balbbering.


Nixon also kept a lot of things secret... a deeply ingrained policy.
Among other things, he would relay partial (or in some cases falsified)
info to the military in order to keep them from knowing his real plans.


So, therefor, it
behooves all Bush supporters to demand that everybody else release all
documents publicly, right?



Nope. I don't think that all documents should be released.


OK which ones?



All of Bush's miltary records? OK - though Bush is not holding up his
military experience as a reason to elect him.


Really? He seems to make some use of it. About as much as Kerry,
actually. I have seen far more Republicans going on and on and on about
Kerry's war record than Democrats.


Kerry's miltary records? Kerry is claiming to be a war hero.


No, he's not. The Bush-Cheney campaign is claiming that he claims to be one.


.... But by basing
his using it as the foundation of his candidacy, he has invited the
scrutiny of his miltary record.


Really? It seems more reasonable to me that the records of Bush and
Kerry should be parked side by side for public inspection.

The argument that Kerry has made himself a legitimate target for this
kind of slander is too close to Rush Limbaugh's claims that Chelsea
Clinton is a legitimate target.

There is no "legitmate target" for abusive slander & character
assassination. If this is the kind of campaign that Bush & Cheney want
to run, what does that say about 1- their performance on the job and 2-
their own moral qualifications to be leaders?

Regards
Doug King


Comcast News August 26th 04 03:02 AM

Kripes Harry,
No one believes that anymore than they believe you own a Lobster Boat or
your wife is anything more than a social worker.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Hey...I tried to get you to look up something...but you didn't take the
bait.



--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002




Comcast News August 26th 04 03:04 AM

NYOB,
Not only is he anal, but he is wrong.

Kripes what a jerk. eh


"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of

freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the

founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of

taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow

job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To

others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the

same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous

manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a

well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument

that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled

that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured

it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and

activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the

people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old

when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon

tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that

in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.


Anal.






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com