"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of freedom for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To others, it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled that it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander Butterfield
are. LOL

"jim--" wrote in message
...

That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL


Wasn't Alexander Butterfield married to that woman who makes pancake syrup

"DSK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup?

I wouldn't call that narrowmindedness. I'd call it uneducated, or lack
of knowledge. Right up to the point where you start offering opinions
(or stating opinions strongly, including calling those who disagree
names) on the subject without any knowledge even when it's been held out
to you.

Then it becomes stupid.

... I was 2 years old when Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.

Still think his opinion on the secretiveness of the Bush White House is
irrelevant?

Yes.


Still think John Dean is a "liberal activist lawyer"?

yes

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To others, it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that in 5
minutes time.

NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To others, it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon tapes. I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that in 5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.




--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the
founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of
taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument
that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled
that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the
people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old
when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon tapes.
I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.



Care to venture a bet on that Krause?

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, that is a sad thing. "My side" is the side of freedom
for
U.S.
citizens to know what their gov't is up to... one of the
founding
principles of our system.


NOYB wrote:
"Your side" is a bunch of politically driven witch-hunters.

Oh, you mean like, people that would spen $60+ million of
taxpayers
hard-earned money trying to nail somebody for getting a blow job?

... If it weren't
an election year, nobody would give a damn.

That's entirely untrue. To you, it may be "no big deal" that a
fundamental liberty of U.S. citizens is being stolen. To others,
it
is
a
very big deal.

... If the case didn't go before
the extremely liberal Clinton-appointee Emmitt Sullivan (the
same
guy
forcing the implementation of all of those ridiculous manatee
zones),
there'd be no case.

Really?

I think you may find this interesting... note the source, a well
known
libby-rull spinmeister named John Dean:

You use the opinion of a liberal attorney to refute my argument
that
the
only reason the case has teeth is because a liberal judge ruled
that
it
might? That's downright laughable. In case you haven't figured it
out,
I
don't have much respect for the opinions of attorneys and activist
judges.

All right, NOYB FINALLY is admitting to his narrow mindedness!!!

Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the
people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup? I was 2 years old
when
Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.



That's no excuse. Now tell me who Rose Mary Woods and Alexander
Butterfield
are. LOL

Woods was the secretary who erased the 18 1/2 minutes of the Nixon tapes.
I
don't know who Butterfield is...but a quick google would correct that in
5
minutes time.






Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.


I would venture any amount of money against your 36 foot custom made lobster
boat that her name is indeed Rose Mary Woods.

The problem is that you do not own a 36 foot custom made lobster boat.

So I will put up $200,000 against your 25 footer...certainly far more than
it is worth....against your claim that there was not a Rose Mary Woods
related to the Nixon scandal vs. your claim of a Rose Mary Wood.

What say you skipper?

In the mood or will you back out of this one also?

Eh?

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news:2p4k54Fgg5scU2@uni-
Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.

You fellows really have problems with hard facts.


Ker-ripes, Harry you are beginning to sound more and more like Basskisser.

Damn you have real problems with hard facts Krause. Her name was and is
Rose Mary Woods.

Is your problem excessive drug abuse or are you off your meds again?

"jim--" wrote in message
...

Ker-ripes. Her name: Rose Mary Wood.
NOT Woods.



Care to venture a bet on that Krause?


jim--,\
Harry is sounding more and more like Basskisser. It looks like both of them
have lost it.

DSK wrote in message ...

They make Nixon look like a blabbermouth.

How hard could that be. Nixon was a blabbermouth that recorded a lot
of his balbbering.

So, therefor, it
behooves all Bush supporters to demand that everybody else release all
documents publicly, right?

Nope. I don't think that all documents should be released.

All of Bush's miltary records? OK - though Bush is not holding up his
military experience as a reason to elect him.

Kerry's miltary records? Kerry is claiming to be a war hero. It is
being disputed. He is using his war hero status as a qaulification to
be president. The most definitely his records should be released.

Kerry would have been a lot better off if he had not taken the war
hero route. 4 months in Vietnam on a fifty foot boat does not bestow
and magical qualifications to be commander-in-chief. But by basing
his using it as the foundation of his candidacy, he has invited the
scrutiny of his miltary record.


NOYB wrote:
"A Freedom of Information Act request by The Post for Kerry's records
produced six pages of information. A spokesman for the Navy Personnel
Command, Mike McClellan, said he was not authorized to release the full
file, which consists of at least a hundred pages."

Michael Dobbs
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, August 22, 2004; Page A01