|
Swift Boat Liars
Thanks.
I didn't know that Johnson, Nixon, Ford, had served in WWII. |
Swift Boat Liars
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:21:28 +0000, Gould 0738 wrote:
Thanks. I didn't know that Johnson, Nixon, Ford, had served in WWII. All Navy. http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Lyndon_B._Johnson http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Richard_Nixon http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Gerald_Ford |
Swift Boat Liars
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message Again, you are too ****ing stupid to understand. Now, go back and READ THE ORIGINAL POST. If it isn't painfully obvious to you which group of swift boat vets are being talked about here, then you are indeed beyond stupid. Golly, bass, you have really picked up your Harry lessons well, as evidenced by your constant stream of personal insult whenever you can't or don't want to respond to a query. I must apologize. I just get sick and tired of having to explain things, which should be obvious to someone who feels the need to interject into a thread. If someone is going to join a thread, it's my feeling they should have at least an inkling about what they are talking about. Harry should be well pleased, imitation and flattery and all that. Unfortunately, as with Harry, it does little to advance the flow of information. Your earlier post, to which you referred me with such vitriol, says only "...other than what the swift boat vets are being paid to say?" This is non-specific, as there are two groups being paid to say different things. No, there is only one group getting paid for their political views. That makes your argument completely invalid. My simple question is, "which swift boat vets", posed for the reasons aforementioned. Now, I gather from your positions on other matters that you are an unhesitating and unquestioning Democrat supporter, Once again, you are wrong. I've voted for Republicans, independents, and Democrats before, and probably will again. I leave my mind open. so I'm guessing that you just naturally presume the anti-Kerry swift boat vets to be the paid group that is lying, and that the other paid group is being truthful. One of the group has already admitted that they told lies upon lies. That would be proof. What proof do you have that the pro-Kerry swift boat vets are lying? By the way, one group calls themselves the swift boat vets, the others call themselves something else. This is yet another clue that you should have picked up on, but failed. So again, I had to answer dumb questions that didn't need to be asked. I simply asked for a clarification from you, that's all. If you're uncomfortable or self-conscious having to state an unequivocal position, I guess I can understand. I've stated my case above. I truly hope you DO understand, but somehow, I doubt it. |
Swift Boat Liars
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net... Actually, not all say he was good. One of the crewman states he was a chicken****, who ran all the time. This appears to be a crewman who served several tours on the river boats. Bill Proof? Pay attention to the news. Do not look to wrecked.boats for all your input. http://www.time.com/time/nation/arti...599034,00.html |
Swift Boat Liars
"basskisser" wrote in message I must apologize. I just get sick and tired of having to explain things, But you haven't explained anything. No, there is only one group getting paid for their political views. I'd love to see documentation on that. Although, I doubt seriously that all Kerry's former crewmembers are paying their own way along the campaign trail, in which case the "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth" would be the group that is *not* being paid for their political views. Do you concur? I've stated my case above. I truly hope you DO understand, but somehow, I doubt it. Gee, this is fun! No matter what or how I ask, you give the same tap-dance answers, which say nothing. That might work in Georgia, but it is not generally successful in serious conversation. Consequently, the only place I encounter this tactic is in exchanges with you, or Harry, and some few others on this NG. |
Swift Boat Liars
|
Swift Boat Liars
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:49:46 -0700, W.T. Hatch
wrote: On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:41:14 GMT, (Tom) wrote: Sir: Although I have read the transcript of Mr. Kerry's 1971 interview on this topic, I wonder if you'd be so kind as to provide some sort of documentation for these specific atrocities you claim were committed by the young LtJG Kerry. I have seen no such documentation--and it is not for lack of a diligent search on my part. Most sincerely, W.T. Hatch Documentation that he claimed to commit these atrocities or that he actually performed the deeds? Kerry admitted to performing or observing these acts himself on live television. Now, either he is telling the truth and is guilty of war crimes, or he lied about it which amounts to filing false claims. You decide which. Dave |
Swift Boat Liars
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message I must apologize. I just get sick and tired of having to explain things, But you haven't explained anything. No, there is only one group getting paid for their political views. I'd love to see documentation on that. Although, I doubt seriously that all Kerry's former crewmembers are paying their own way along the campaign trail, in which case the "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth" would be the group that is *not* being paid for their political views. Do you concur? I've stated my case above. I truly hope you DO understand, but somehow, I doubt it. Gee, this is fun! No matter what or how I ask, you give the same tap-dance answers, which say nothing. That might work in Georgia, but it is not generally successful in serious conversation. Consequently, the only place I encounter this tactic is in exchanges with you, or Harry, and some few others on this NG. Holy, ****, John, are you REALLY saying that you STILL don't understand which group I'm talking about? REALLY???? |
Swift Boat Liars
basskisser wrote:
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message I must apologize. I just get sick and tired of having to explain things, But you haven't explained anything. No, there is only one group getting paid for their political views. I'd love to see documentation on that. Although, I doubt seriously that all Kerry's former crewmembers are paying their own way along the campaign trail, in which case the "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth" would be the group that is *not* being paid for their political views. Do you concur? I've stated my case above. I truly hope you DO understand, but somehow, I doubt it. Gee, this is fun! No matter what or how I ask, you give the same tap-dance answers, which say nothing. That might work in Georgia, but it is not generally successful in serious conversation. Consequently, the only place I encounter this tactic is in exchanges with you, or Harry, and some few others on this NG. Holy, ****, John, are you REALLY saying that you STILL don't understand which group I'm talking about? REALLY???? Serious question: how long do you think it will take President Kerry to clean up the awful mess left behind when Bush leaves the White House in January? It's going to take years on the diplomatic front...and some time to undo Bush's damage to the environment, to health care, to the infrastructure... It's going to take at least two terms of Kerry, two terms of Edwards or Barack Obama and...well, after that, I probably won't care. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
Swift Boat Liars
"basskisser" wrote in message Holy, ****, John, are you REALLY saying that you STILL don't understand which group I'm talking about? REALLY???? By God, this is fun! You never get it! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com