![]() |
Views of Kerry
"Joe Parsons" wrote in message ... On 06 Aug 2004 18:10:57 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote: From Google: Your search - miller group:rec.boats author:gould0738 - did not match any documents. From Google: Your search - zell group:rec.boats author:gould0738 - did not match any documents. ******************* Very interesting. Wouldn't you think that if I had attacked Zell Miller in the NG, I would have had to use either the words "Zell" or "Miller" ? There's a part of me that wants to see just how far Dennis (or whatever his name is) will go to maintain his (now obviously absurd) premise. But there's the other, more rational part that tells me that he's already shown to whoever may still be reading that he's talking through his...hat. Joe Parsons I just googled and got 76 hits. Don't you know how to google Joe? Maybe your kids can help you. |
Views of Kerry
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:26:58 -0400, "jim--" wrote:
"Joe Parsons" wrote in message .. . On 06 Aug 2004 18:10:57 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote: From Google: Your search - miller group:rec.boats author:gould0738 - did not match any documents. From Google: Your search - zell group:rec.boats author:gould0738 - did not match any documents. ******************* Very interesting. Wouldn't you think that if I had attacked Zell Miller in the NG, I would have had to use either the words "Zell" or "Miller" ? There's a part of me that wants to see just how far Dennis (or whatever his name is) will go to maintain his (now obviously absurd) premise. But there's the other, more rational part that tells me that he's already shown to whoever may still be reading that he's talking through his...hat. Joe Parsons I just googled and got 76 hits. Don't you know how to google Joe? Maybe your kids can help you. Oh, I can get LOTS of hits from Google. Matter of fact, I just got about 384,000. Here's a hint for you: the words you put into the search fields make a difference in your results. Joe Parsons |
Views of Kerry
"Joe Parsons" wrote in message ... On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:26:58 -0400, "jim--" wrote: "Joe Parsons" wrote in message .. . On 06 Aug 2004 18:10:57 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote: From Google: Your search - miller group:rec.boats author:gould0738 - did not match any documents. From Google: Your search - zell group:rec.boats author:gould0738 - did not match any documents. ******************* Very interesting. Wouldn't you think that if I had attacked Zell Miller in the NG, I would have had to use either the words "Zell" or "Miller" ? There's a part of me that wants to see just how far Dennis (or whatever his name is) will go to maintain his (now obviously absurd) premise. But there's the other, more rational part that tells me that he's already shown to whoever may still be reading that he's talking through his...hat. Joe Parsons I just googled and got 76 hits. Don't you know how to google Joe? Maybe your kids can help you. Oh, I can get LOTS of hits from Google. Matter of fact, I just got about 384,000. Then you obviously have no idea what you are doing Joe. Here's a hint for you: the words you put into the search fields make a difference in your results. Joe Parsons They sure do. And that is why I found it. Sorry you are having such difficulty with such a simple task. |
Views of Kerry
I just googled and got 76 hits. Don't you know how to google Chuck?
Apparently not well enough. It turns out I was wrong. Somebody suggested a slightly different Google technique, and I did find one post, from 2002 in which I referred to Zell Miller in an extremely neutral manner. (There were about 5 posts that used the word "miller", but most of them have to do with a local boat yard, not a politician.) Actually, I merely copied and quoted the words "Zell MIller" from a post by a conservative who was playing some juvenile "gotcha" game by posting a Zell Miller quote, and then asking everybody to guess which Democrat had made the statement. My "attacking comment" was an evaluation of the statement, not Mr. Miller I posted, "It sounds more like something a conservative Republican might say". That's certainly not a case of ganging up with the moderates on this board to attack Zell Miller. One could make case that Zell Miller has been invited to speak at the Republican convention precisely *because* he sounds like a conservative Republican. If you'd be willing to stipulate that sounding like a conservative Republican is such a horrible thing that accusing somebody of doing that is an "attack, and an insult".... I'd be intersted to see you take this discussion in that direction. Sorry, but you're wrong again, Jim. I have never attacked Zell Miller in the NG, and searching the Google archives where you claim the evidence resides yields *nothing* similar to your description. It's time for you to fess up to your error, put up your proof, or shut up and slink away from this issue. |
Views of Kerry
"jps" wrote in message ... In article , says... Sort of like Zel Miller being ashamed of the tactics of the Democratic party? Zell Miller hasn't been a Democrat in years. He uses his political position and a fulcrum and pulpit. Few Democrats pay attention while the Republicans all hail. Zell and Calf Bill are twins. jps He is older. We are moderates. You do not have to be an extreme lefty as most of you Dem's that are posting, to be a democrat. You must have thought Harry S. Truman was an extreme righty also. |
Views of Kerry
On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 14:25:13 -0400, DSK wrote:
Gould 0738 wrote: .... Do they shoot right wingers for being wrong, or something? Why would they do that? To encourage the others? If they took the time to admit they were wrong, whenever they were wrong, the'd have no time left to be wrong again. Self preservation. bb |
Views of Kerry
jim-- wrote:
Why should I? I spoke the truth. Not in your current lifetime. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
Views of Kerry
|
Views of Kerry
jps wrote:
In article et, says... "jps" wrote in message ... In article , says... Sort of like Zel Miller being ashamed of the tactics of the Democratic party? Zell Miller hasn't been a Democrat in years. He uses his political position and a fulcrum and pulpit. Few Democrats pay attention while the Republicans all hail. Zell and Calf Bill are twins. jps He is older. We are moderates. You do not have to be an extreme lefty as most of you Dem's that are posting, to be a democrat. You must have thought Harry S. Truman was an extreme righty also. Harry Truman was a human being with morals and ethics. Can you possibly compare Zell Miller the shill to Harry Truman? You and Zell represent the *extreme* right wing of the Democratic Party. You're further right than a lot of moderates in the Republican Party. jps Zell Miller is a Dixiecrat, the sort of right-wing extremist asshole the Democratic Party expunged in the 1960s. These idiots gravitated to the GOP, which welcomed their smallmindedness with open arms, and they became the GOP southern strategy. Some Dixiecrats, like Miller and California bill, never bothered to change their parties. Bill, like Miller, is a Republican. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com