Gould 0738 wrote:

This is due to years of democrats undermining the military. We are losing
lives because of the liberals giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

Terrorist
listen to the democrats here and figure if they can just hold out a little
longer, they will win. If the dems would put as much effort into helping

this country as they do bad mouthing it, the terrorist problem would have
been handled years ago.

Ever consider moving to a police state? In such a system, *nobody* is allowed
to express any dissent when the government
launches a war or question the motives/wisdom of participating in same.

It makes a very efficient system. The government simply declares how it is
proper to think about this subject or that, and those who disagree better darn
well keep mouth shut- or they'll be a burning corpse by morning.

Anybody in Iraq who might wonder what the official will of the American people
might be, has only to look out the window
and see the occupation troops on the street. Only to huddle in the cellar and
pray to Allah as the bombs and artillery rounds fall on structures that may be
very nearby. (As was the case 2-3 nights ago)

When the country is wrong, should we avoid speaking out simply because the
people "in charge" are making the mistake?

Under a police state, the republicans will have to keep silent wehn the
democrats are in charge or be suspected of treason. Same when the reverse is
true.

Would you like such a system? It seems to be what you're advocating in your
post.


The saddest part is the bit about giving "aid and comfort" to the enemy.
What enemy? The people in Iraq resisting the forces of the United
States? Those people weren't "resisting" us until we invaded their country.

Those are the people we are "fighting" in Iraq. We're certainly not
fighting the terrorists responsible for planning or carrying out 9-11.
We don't have much like finding those folks. But the Iraqi people? Well,
they're available, and some of them fight back.

--
Email sent to is never read.