"Tamaroak" wrote in message
...
Two reasons to vote for Bush:

-You've got a LOT of money and don't want to share it with anyone.

I don't have a lot of money, but the money I have is mine...and I *don't*
want to share it with anyone except people of my choosing.


-You're just plain stupid.

Wrong. Democrats have the monopoly on that.

I'll give you the *main* reasons one should vote for Bush:

He's smart enough to recognize that bin Laden was serious about destroying
America when he declared war on us under Clinton's watch in 1998.

He's smart enough to recognize that bin Laden's effort to kick us out of
Saudi Arabia and the Middle East is nothing more than a power-grab by al
Qaeda to seize the oil and thus destroy America and the West economically.

He is smart enough to know that you either must protect the oil supply from
the Middle East, or you must drill in ANWR...'cause our infrastructure and
economy depend upon it. He's not as naive as the fools who think we can
just quit using oil tomorrow if Saudi Arabia is seized by al-Qaeda
terrorists who won't sell us oil.

He is smart enough to know that peace between Israel and those who blow up
civilian buses, restaurants, and nightclubs is impossible. Build a wall and
let the bad blood pass for a generation or two.

He is smart enough to know that you can't make our country safer by hiring
more border guards, and hiring more customs agents at the shipping ports.
He knows that you must go out and hunt the enemy, and bring the battle to
him, instead of letting the enemy dictate the time and place of the next
attack.


He is smart enough to know that the enemy sees vacillation and hesitation as
weaknesses. He has the backbone to never waver in the face of adversity.
He isn't shaped by the polls, or by what a bunch of Europeans or Canadians
or left-wing journalists think. He does what he knows is right. In fact,
he does what he knows is our only hope to win the life and death struggle
between radical Islam and the non-Muslim religions of the World.

Finally, he is smart enough to know that the American people want to be in
control of themselves, and not under the thumb of a terrorist organization
which controls the World oil supply, or under the control of a UN assembly
that is spineless, corrupt, and hypocritical.


You liberals keep running on the fact that Bush is missing 3 months of
National Guard pay records from 1970-something. Bush will run on the things
I outlined above. Then we'll see which candidate the American people will
choose in November. Just don't cry again like you did when Gore lost.

"NOYB" wrote in message link.net...
"Tamaroak" wrote in message
...
How does one like a lying deserter over a decorated veteran?

You guys are too funny. Despite your best shots, nobody has come forth
with any proof that Bush lied, nor that he deserted. Got any proof?

I say that Kerry is lying about the circumstances of his three purple
hearts. I say that they're all self-inflicted so that he could get home
after only 4 months in Vietnam. And by your standards, I don't even need
proof!

Why do *YOU* think that he wasn't paid for three months?

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

...and...Clinton. Liberals remained awfully silent on the Vietnam War
litmus test when he was President...except maybe when they were screaming
that it didn't matter.

He avoided service the scary way: By simply avoiding it. I'm not aware of
his lying about that. Remember that when he was of age, the cat was already
out of the bag, in terms of what a scam the war was. Nobody in their right
mind was using the words "domino effect" any more, and the secretary of
defense said it was pointless.

But, you're too young to have been aware of any of it. All you know is what
you hear on the radio.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
"Tamaroak" wrote in message
...
How does one like a lying deserter over a decorated veteran?

You guys are too funny. Despite your best shots, nobody has come forth
with any proof that Bush lied, nor that he deserted. Got any proof?

I say that Kerry is lying about the circumstances of his three purple
hearts. I say that they're all self-inflicted so that he could get home
after only 4 months in Vietnam. And by your standards, I don't even
need
proof!

Why do *YOU* think that he wasn't paid for three months?

I'm not convinced he wasn't paid for three months. I've seen your
allegations, but no proof.

"NOYB" wrote in message
. net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
"Tamaroak" wrote in message
...
How does one like a lying deserter over a decorated veteran?

You guys are too funny. Despite your best shots, nobody has come
forth
with any proof that Bush lied, nor that he deserted. Got any proof?

I say that Kerry is lying about the circumstances of his three purple
hearts. I say that they're all self-inflicted so that he could get
home
after only 4 months in Vietnam. And by your standards, I don't even
need
proof!

Why do *YOU* think that he wasn't paid for three months?

I'm not convinced he wasn't paid for three months. I've seen your
allegations, but no proof.



Avoiding the news again???

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
. net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
"Tamaroak" wrote in message
...
How does one like a lying deserter over a decorated veteran?

You guys are too funny. Despite your best shots, nobody has come
forth
with any proof that Bush lied, nor that he deserted. Got any proof?

I say that Kerry is lying about the circumstances of his three
purple
hearts. I say that they're all self-inflicted so that he could get
home
after only 4 months in Vietnam. And by your standards, I don't even
need
proof!

Why do *YOU* think that he wasn't paid for three months?

I'm not convinced he wasn't paid for three months. I've seen your
allegations, but no proof.



Avoiding the news again???

Sorry, Doug, but something that happened 30 years ago is not news...it's
history.

"NOYB" wrote in message
et...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
. net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
"Tamaroak" wrote in message
...
How does one like a lying deserter over a decorated veteran?

You guys are too funny. Despite your best shots, nobody has come
forth
with any proof that Bush lied, nor that he deserted. Got any
proof?

I say that Kerry is lying about the circumstances of his three
purple
hearts. I say that they're all self-inflicted so that he could
get
home
after only 4 months in Vietnam. And by your standards, I don't
even
need
proof!

Why do *YOU* think that he wasn't paid for three months?

I'm not convinced he wasn't paid for three months. I've seen your
allegations, but no proof.



Avoiding the news again???

Sorry, Doug, but something that happened 30 years ago is not news...it's
history.




In that case, it matters nothing to you that Clinton chose not to get his
head blown off in a maniac's war.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
et...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
. net...

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
"Tamaroak" wrote in message
...
How does one like a lying deserter over a decorated veteran?

You guys are too funny. Despite your best shots, nobody has
come
forth
with any proof that Bush lied, nor that he deserted. Got any
proof?

I say that Kerry is lying about the circumstances of his three
purple
hearts. I say that they're all self-inflicted so that he could
get
home
after only 4 months in Vietnam. And by your standards, I don't
even
need
proof!

Why do *YOU* think that he wasn't paid for three months?

I'm not convinced he wasn't paid for three months. I've seen your
allegations, but no proof.



Avoiding the news again???

Sorry, Doug, but something that happened 30 years ago is not news...it's
history.




In that case, it matters nothing to you that Clinton chose not to get his
head blown off in a maniac's war.

No, it really doesn't. What bothers me more is someone like Kerry who, 35
years later, tries to exploit the fact that he spent approximately 4 more
months in Vietnam than George W. Bush. Are we supposed to believe that we
can learn more about the man from the 4 months he spent in Vietnam than from
the 20+ years he spent in Congress voting against military, defense, and
intelligence spending?

Puh-leeeeze!

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Hey, NOYB

When you "combine" the results of several polls it's still 327 to 211
(EV's) in
Kerry's favor.

http://www.electionprojection.com/elections2004.html


SIGN SEEN ON A TIP JAR TODAY:

Hey, Republicans! Afraid of change? Leave it here! :-)

The jar was owned by a Democrat of course.

SIGN SEEN ON A TIP JAR TODAY:

Hey, Republicans! Afraid of change? Leave it here! :-)

The jar was owned by a Democrat of course.

Yup. Just another hard working American trying to scratch a living together.
Just a single mom too proud to take welfare, and working for the subsistence
mini-wages paid by a billionaire "compassionate conservative".