Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Bush wants DEMOCRACY in Mideast??? Or "credibility"?
Cross posting provides benefit only when the context is beneficial to its
readers, or believable. "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "WaIIy" wrote in message ... On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:59:48 -0800, "jps" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . When I had had my boat for six months, there was still a lot I didn't know about it. I learned a lot about risers and headers when I pulled mine to check them out. Some things just take time. Every year I learn more. As time goes by, you will learn more too. You won't learn a lot about headers or anything else from Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly. Nor from you, jps. What the heck your reply has to do with John's comments is beyond me. You crossposted this to four groups because.... ? Look closer, Einstein, the original writer crossposted it. If you respond, your reply goes to the same groups as the original message, unless you edit out the extraneous ones. Most of us don't do the editing because it's not worth the trouble. Crossposting provides a benefit if the posting is done to groups that make sense. Obviously, in this case, it didn't. Main Entry: ex·tra·ne·ous Pronunciation: ek-'strA-nE-&s Function: adjective Etymology: Latin extraneus -- more at STRANGE Date: 1638 1 : existing on or coming from the outside 2 a : not forming an essential or vital part extraneous ornamentation b : having no relevance an extraneous digression 3 : being a number obtained in solving an equation that is not a solution of the equation extraneous roots |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Bush wants DEMOCRACY in Mideast??? Or "credibility"?
"JohnH" wrote When I had had my boat for six months, there was still a lot I didn't know about it. I learned a lot about risers and headers when I pulled mine to check them out. Some things just take time. Every year I learn more. As time goes by, you will learn more too. The difference being, of course, that you were interested in finding out, and not so afraid that you wouldn't try anything for fear of failing (again). Dan |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Bush wants DEMOCRACY in Mideast??? Or "credibility"?
"Ignoramus14327" wrote in message ... Bush said that he wants more democracy in Mideast. He earlier said that he wanted democracy in Iraq and that's why he went there and clusterbombed towns etc. I have to ask, the US has been occupying Iraq for 6 months already. Quite a bit of time. Where are the elections? Where are any preparations for elections? You would think that if he really wanted democracy in Iraq, at least some election process would be underway. Maybe elections would be scheduled for, say, March and now there would be political parties forming etc. No such thing is happening. No effort to do that is apparent. Where is democracy? Now, obviously, I am aware that Bush is a liar least interested in Mideast democracy. My questions were rhetorical. So what was the point of his speech? And I think that it is a threat to mideast governments to stay in line and not complain about occupation of Iraq, etc. But this threat is hollow. The US no longer has forces capable of occupying one more midsize country due to being mired in Iraq. We all talk about how getting out of Iraq would "destroy our credibility". Which means that other countries will not be as afraid of us as we would like them to be if we withdraw. Well, right now we are very firmly stuck in Iraq with not much more forces to spare for further military adventures. What does that do to our "credibility"? Can we credibly threaten, say, Iran, when our reservists are doing yearlong tours of duty in Iraq already? No. What does this mean? That our credibility is already being ruined no matter what we do in Iraq. Getting out is bad for "credibility", staying is not better either, but maybe more expensive. Either way is bad. And winning in Iraq does not seem like it will happen anytime soon. I expect the dumbest members of these newsgroups to attack my posting alias (saying your alias Ignoramus fits you well), and the slightly less stupid ones to dismiss me as a "liberal" (which I am not). I invite the more intelligent posters to review my argument and see where the fallacy lies, if you can find any. i Its obvious you havent been around a lot of politicians The first order of the day is to eliminate the oppisition , then when that is done , the victors are deemed to be democraticaly elected . Any dissenters are actualy labeled terrorists and shot. Doing it like this actualy saves the voting public manymillions of dollars by not needing elections , everyone knows that it doesnt matter who you vote for , youre going to get screwed anyway . When GB is finnished eliminating the terrorists and those who dont want his troops around there will be exeedingly few people left to vte anyway . What the problem ? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Bush wants DEMOCRACY in Mideast??? Or "credibility"?
"Bill in Co." wrote in message nk.net... On what topic? And for what group, Igor? Make up your mind. Looks like you've got four crossposted groups in here. Perhaps your son can clarify it. He forgot alt.barefoot for some reason Ignoramus14327 wrote: In article , John Gaquin wrote: "Ignoramus14327" wrote in message I have to ask, the US has been occupying Iraq for 6 months already. Quite a bit of time. Where are the elections? Clearly no knowledge or grasp of history. Utterly clueless. Disregard remaining blather. If you have nothing to say, do not say anything. If you do have something to say, put forth your case. i |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Bush wants DEMOCRACY in Mideast??? Or "credibility"?
He forgot alt.sex.fetish.sheep too.
-W just sayin' "Myal" wrote in message ... "Bill in Co." wrote in message nk.net... On what topic? And for what group, Igor? Make up your mind. Looks like you've got four crossposted groups in here. Perhaps your son can clarify it. He forgot alt.barefoot for some reason Ignoramus14327 wrote: In article , John Gaquin wrote: "Ignoramus14327" wrote in message I have to ask, the US has been occupying Iraq for 6 months already. Quite a bit of time. Where are the elections? Clearly no knowledge or grasp of history. Utterly clueless. Disregard remaining blather. If you have nothing to say, do not say anything. If you do have something to say, put forth your case. i |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Bush wants DEMOCRACY in Mideast??? Or "credibility"?
He forgot alt.sex.fetish.sheep too.
-W just sayin' "Myal" wrote in message ... "Bill in Co." wrote in message nk.net... On what topic? And for what group, Igor? Make up your mind. Looks like you've got four crossposted groups in here. Perhaps your son can clarify it. He forgot alt.barefoot for some reason Ignoramus14327 wrote: In article , John Gaquin wrote: "Ignoramus14327" wrote in message I have to ask, the US has been occupying Iraq for 6 months already. Quite a bit of time. Where are the elections? Clearly no knowledge or grasp of history. Utterly clueless. Disregard remaining blather. If you have nothing to say, do not say anything. If you do have something to say, put forth your case. i |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Bush wants DEMOCRACY in Mideast??? Or "credibility"?
Hmmmm, That double posted?? It wasn't THAT funny.... lol.
-W "Clams Canino" wrote in message news:C8Yqb.103887$9E1.499582@attbi_s52... He forgot alt.sex.fetish.sheep too. -W just sayin' "Myal" wrote in message ... "Bill in Co." wrote in message nk.net... On what topic? And for what group, Igor? Make up your mind. Looks like you've got four crossposted groups in here. Perhaps your son can clarify it. He forgot alt.barefoot for some reason Ignoramus14327 wrote: In article , John Gaquin wrote: "Ignoramus14327" wrote in message I have to ask, the US has been occupying Iraq for 6 months already. Quite a bit of time. Where are the elections? Clearly no knowledge or grasp of history. Utterly clueless. Disregard remaining blather. If you have nothing to say, do not say anything. If you do have something to say, put forth your case. i |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Bush wants DEMOCRACY in Mideast??? Or "credibility"?
"Clams Canino" wrote in message news:C8Yqb.103887$9E1.499582@attbi_s52... He forgot alt.sex.fetish.sheep too. Turn your radio down,(...your radio down) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Bush wants DEMOCRACY in Mideast??? Or "credibility"?
" Tuuk" wrote in message
... Cross posting provides benefit only when the context is beneficial to its readers, or believable. You're right. But, some dolts like to clamp onto a word or term they think is naughty, or cool, (like "socialist", "ad hominem" or "crossposting"), and use it to death. Somehow, the entire process of crossposting had gotten a bad rap. But, if you have a question about networking windows 98 and you crosspost to win98.general and win98.networking, the responses will be seen in both newsgroups and you'll have your answers in half the time. Listening, Wally? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Bush wants DEMOCRACY in Mideast??? Or "credibility"?
There is nothing wrong with alt.sex.fetish.sheep
Clams Canino wrote: He forgot alt.sex.fetish.sheep too. -W just sayin' "Myal" wrote in message ... "Bill in Co." wrote in message link.net... On what topic? And for what group, Igor? Make up your mind. Looks like you've got four crossposted groups in here. Perhaps your son can clarify it. He forgot alt.barefoot for some reason Ignoramus14327 wrote: In article , John Gaquin wrote: "Ignoramus14327" wrote in message I have to ask, the US has been occupying Iraq for 6 months already. Quite a bit of time. Where are the elections? Clearly no knowledge or grasp of history. Utterly clueless. Disregard remaining blather. If you have nothing to say, do not say anything. If you do have something to say, put forth your case. i |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bush Quotes | General | |||
Bush Drops to 49%? Arrest the Pollsters | General |