Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,638
Default Friend of Herring's?

On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 09:01:17 -0500, John wrote:

On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 23:26:26 -0500, Wayne B
wrote:

On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 22:35:26 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 14:25:15 -0500, Wayne B
wrote:

On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 12:09:56 -0500, John wrote:



All that said, I'd be very surprised if the cop even gets a reprimand
let alone prosecuted or convicted.

Have any of you "law and order" types considered the irony of your
defense of this womans behavior?

I just want the same standards to apply. If they can shoot a woman
trying to get into an empty office, shop owners should be able to
shoot looters.


===

In a "stand your ground" state you are allowed to use deadly force to
prevent a forcible felony. You may very well have to defend that
position in court however if the case becomes politicized or the facts
are in doubt.

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0776/Sections/0776.013.html



Shame on you, Wayne. The phrase was "... imminent commission of a forcible
felony". That word 'imminent' keeps rearing it's ugly head.

There is another poster here who tends to quote only the parts he likes. I hope
your commission was just a mistake.


===

I think you meant omission rather than commission, and I feel no need
for shame whatsoever.

That said, here is the exact wording of the statute that I referenced:

(b) Deadly force if he or she reasonably believes that using or
threatening to use such force is necessary to prevent imminent death
or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent
the imminent commission of a forcible felony.

I'm not a lawyer, and I try to avoid playing one on the internet, but
I see nothing that conflicts with our previous discussion. To me
"imminent" means something that is likely about to happen. "Forcible
Felony" is also fairly clear and includes a broad range of activities
from assault to armed tresspass. Certainly assault on a federal law
enforcement officer falls into that category. Do you disagree?


  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,257
Default Friend of Herring's?

On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 15:03:18 -0500, Wayne B
wrote:

On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 09:01:17 -0500, John wrote:

On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 23:26:26 -0500, Wayne B
wrote:

On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 22:35:26 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 14:25:15 -0500, Wayne B
wrote:

On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 12:09:56 -0500, John wrote:



All that said, I'd be very surprised if the cop even gets a reprimand
let alone prosecuted or convicted.

Have any of you "law and order" types considered the irony of your
defense of this womans behavior?

I just want the same standards to apply. If they can shoot a woman
trying to get into an empty office, shop owners should be able to
shoot looters.

===

In a "stand your ground" state you are allowed to use deadly force to
prevent a forcible felony. You may very well have to defend that
position in court however if the case becomes politicized or the facts
are in doubt.

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0776/Sections/0776.013.html



Shame on you, Wayne. The phrase was "... imminent commission of a forcible
felony". That word 'imminent' keeps rearing it's ugly head.

There is another poster here who tends to quote only the parts he likes. I hope
your commission was just a mistake.


===

I think you meant omission rather than commission, and I feel no need
for shame whatsoever.

That said, here is the exact wording of the statute that I referenced:

(b) Deadly force if he or she reasonably believes that using or
threatening to use such force is necessary to prevent imminent death
or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent
the imminent commission of a forcible felony.

I'm not a lawyer, and I try to avoid playing one on the internet, but
I see nothing that conflicts with our previous discussion. To me
"imminent" means something that is likely about to happen. "Forcible
Felony" is also fairly clear and includes a broad range of activities
from assault to armed tresspass. Certainly assault on a federal law
enforcement officer falls into that category. Do you disagree?


Yup, 'omission' is the correct word. If the assault was 'imminent', then I agree
to the use of deadly force.

In the case under discussion, there was no imminent expectation of death or
great bodily harm. The f'ing woman was only halfway through the window with a
barricade in front of her.
--

Freedom Isn't Free!
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A friend of Herring and Just-An-Ass? Keyser Söze[_3_] General 2 January 12th 21 02:43 PM
From my friend... F.O.A.D. General 2 October 9th 13 09:42 PM
A Friend of Herring's... iBoaterer[_3_] General 4 August 26th 13 03:44 PM
Friend of Herring jps General 17 December 1st 11 02:28 PM
Man's best friend. A little OT... John H[_2_] General 1 March 10th 11 12:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017