Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/26/2019 10:32 AM, Tim wrote:
Mr. Luddite - show quoted text - Sometimes I yearn for the good old days. Firing up a 50 HP Mercury "Tower of Power" to go water-skiing with the 16' "run-a-bout". The smell of the blue, unburned mixed fuel wafting in the air and the oil slicks in the water at idle. Ah ... those were the days. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com ..... Some of that’s going to happen soon at my place. Only a 115hp “Tower..” Yeah. When I was a kid a 50 hp outboard was a "big" one. When I was a youngster (9-10 years old) I was fascinated with outboard engines and had cutout pictures of all the current manufacturer's models hanging on my bedroom walls. I remember I wrote an essay for school on why Mercury was better than Evinrude or Johnson with all kinds of technical reasons that I probably made up. I ended it with a sentence that said for those who disagree, "More Power to You" which was a Mercury slogan back in the late 50's. I am sure the woman teacher I had must have been amused but she gave me an "A" on the essay, citing my clever use of a pun of sorts. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() 9:39 AMMr. Luddite - show quoted text - Yeah. When I was a kid a 50 hp outboard was a "big" one. When I was a youngster (9-10 years old) I was fascinated with outboard engines and had cutout pictures of all the current manufacturer's models hanging on my bedroom walls. I remember I wrote an essay for school on why Mercury was better than Evinrude or Johnson with all kinds of technical reasons that I probably made up. I ended it with a sentence that said for those who disagree, "More Power to You" which was a Mercury slogan back in the late 50's. I am sure the woman teacher I had must have been amused but she gave me an "A" on the essay, citing my clever use of a pun of sorts. ....... Yes, the 50 would have been the “big one” when the “35’s” would have been the hefty standard. And yes, using that closing remark made for a great catch phrase. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim wrote:
9:39 AMMr. Luddite - show quoted text - Yeah. When I was a kid a 50 hp outboard was a "big" one. When I was a youngster (9-10 years old) I was fascinated with outboard engines and had cutout pictures of all the current manufacturer's models hanging on my bedroom walls. I remember I wrote an essay for school on why Mercury was better than Evinrude or Johnson with all kinds of technical reasons that I probably made up. I ended it with a sentence that said for those who disagree, "More Power to You" which was a Mercury slogan back in the late 50's. I am sure the woman teacher I had must have been amused but she gave me an "A" on the essay, citing my clever use of a pun of sorts. ...... Yes, the 50 would have been the “big one” when the “35’s” would have been the hefty standard. And yes, using that closing remark made for a great catch phrase. We had a 23’ Magnolia cuddly cabin with dual 35’s. Boat was lightweight and neared 40 with the 35’s. Dad for some reason switched to 45’s. Performance was the same. An article on the boats. They borrow our boat trailer to haul the boat to the dealer in El Cerrito when they hit a bell buoy in daylight in by the Richmond harbor. Knocked a small hole in the bow near the rub rail. http://www.fiberglassics.com/library...title=Magnolia |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() 11:32 AMBill - show quoted text - We had a 23’ Magnolia cuddly cabin with dual 35’s. Boat was lightweight and neared 40 with the 35’s. Dad for some reason switched to 45’s. Performance was the same. An article on the boats. They borrow our boat trailer to haul the boat to the dealer in El Cerrito when they hit a bell buoy in daylight in by the Richmond harbor. Knocked a small hole in the bow near the rub rail. http://www.fiberglassics.com/library...title=Magnolia ...... 20 more hp and no difference in performance? Huh. And how do you run over a bell buoy like that? Blind I guess.. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim wrote:
11:32 AMBill - show quoted text - We had a 23’ Magnolia cuddly cabin with dual 35’s. Boat was lightweight and neared 40 with the 35’s. Dad for some reason switched to 45’s. Performance was the same. An article on the boats. They borrow our boat trailer to haul the boat to the dealer in El Cerrito when they hit a bell buoy in daylight in by the Richmond harbor. Knocked a small hole in the bow near the rub rail. http://www.fiberglassics.com/library...title=Magnolia ..... 20 more hp and no difference in performance? Huh. And how do you run over a bell buoy like that? Blind I guess.. The boat was really pretty lightweight. Goofing around one day by Berkeley Pier. Was a section between the launch area that was protected from the wind. Dad was having a beer in the bar and buddy and I were out hot ridding the boat. We made a sharp turn and the high winds were about 2’ above the water. Caught the bottom and figured were going fore a swim. Actually lifted one motor out of the water. I think the lack of performance increase was probably same props and same RPM max. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, March 26, 2019 at 1:34:01 PM UTC-5, Bill wrote:
Tim wrote: 11:32 AMBill - show quoted text - We had a 23’ Magnolia cuddly cabin with dual 35’s. Boat was lightweight and neared 40 with the 35’s. Dad for some reason switched to 45’s. Performance was the same. An article on the boats. They borrow our boat trailer to haul the boat to the dealer in El Cerrito when they hit a bell buoy in daylight in by the Richmond harbor. Knocked a small hole in the bow near the rub rail. http://www.fiberglassics.com/library...title=Magnolia ..... 20 more hp and no difference in performance? Huh. And how do you run over a bell buoy like that? Blind I guess.. The boat was really pretty lightweight. Goofing around one day by Berkeley Pier. Was a section between the launch area that was protected from the wind. Dad was having a beer in the bar and buddy and I were out hot ridding the boat. We made a sharp turn and the high winds were about 2’ above the water. Caught the bottom and figured were going fore a swim. Actually lifted one motor out of the water. I think the lack of performance increase was probably same props and same RPM max. Now that makes sense. same props same rpm,same speed. doesn't matter what engine you have |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:39:47 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 3/26/2019 10:32 AM, Tim wrote: Mr. Luddite - show quoted text - Sometimes I yearn for the good old days. Firing up a 50 HP Mercury "Tower of Power" to go water-skiing with the 16' "run-a-bout". The smell of the blue, unburned mixed fuel wafting in the air and the oil slicks in the water at idle. Ah ... those were the days. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com ..... Some of that’s going to happen soon at my place. Only a 115hp “Tower..” Yeah. When I was a kid a 50 hp outboard was a "big" one. When I was a youngster (9-10 years old) I was fascinated with outboard engines and had cutout pictures of all the current manufacturer's models hanging on my bedroom walls. I remember I wrote an essay for school on why Mercury was better than Evinrude or Johnson with all kinds of technical reasons that I probably made up. I ended it with a sentence that said for those who disagree, "More Power to You" which was a Mercury slogan back in the late 50's. I am sure the woman teacher I had must have been amused but she gave me an "A" on the essay, citing my clever use of a pun of sorts. I remember when Merc came out with that whopping 100 HP. My mother's boss had to have one (1959-60?) He had it on a 17' Lone Star down at Port Tobacco Md and it was the baddest boat on the water at that time. I doubt it did much more than 40 tho. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() - show quoted text - I remember when Merc came out with that whopping 100 HP. My mother's boss had to have one (1959-60?) He had it on a 17' Lone Star down at Port Tobacco Md and it was the baddest boat on the water at that time. I doubt it did much more than 40 tho. ........ Sometimes it seems that 40 on the water feels like 90 on land... |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:12:11 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: - show quoted text - I remember when Merc came out with that whopping 100 HP. My mother's boss had to have one (1959-60?) He had it on a 17' Lone Star down at Port Tobacco Md and it was the baddest boat on the water at that time. I doubt it did much more than 40 tho. ....... Sometimes it seems that 40 on the water feels like 90 on land... Yup that is true. When we were at the Teamsters deal at LOTO there was a guy with a 15' racing skiff with twin Merc 85s on it and that would go about 60 with 3 people on board. We really thought we were flying. These days that is any garden variety flats or bass boat. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:12:11 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: - show quoted text - Yup that is true. When we were at the Teamsters deal at LOTO there was a guy with a 15' racing skiff with twin Merc 85s on it and that would go about 60 with 3 people on board. We really thought we were flying. These days that is any garden variety flats or bass boat. ..... Yep and now you see twin 350s on the family pontoon. Stuff that was unheard of 30 and even 20 years ago... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A new boating group | General | |||
Boating Group | General | |||
Boating group | General | |||
It's a BOATing group | General | |||
This is NOT a Boating Group, it an O.T Group | General |