“Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Schumer (D-N.Y.) had not expected the session to
be televised and repeatedly asked Trump to take the discussions
off-camera. But the president allowed the acrimonious encounter to
continue for nearly 20 minutes before kicking the media out of the Oval
Office. ...�


They’re evidently used to closed door and back room deals and can’t handle the wide open spaces.. nothing wrong with having the discussion out in the open.

On 12/12/18 7:48 AM, Tim wrote:
“Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Schumer (D-N.Y.) had not expected the session to
be televised and repeatedly asked Trump to take the discussions
off-camera. But the president allowed the acrimonious encounter to
continue for nearly 20 minutes before kicking the media out of the Oval
Office. ...�


They’re evidently used to closed door and back room deals and can’t handle the wide open spaces.. nothing wrong with having the discussion out in the open.


It was wonderful to watch Donald Bluster make a fool out of himself,
over and over. So, when is MEXICO going to pay for Trump's wall?

On 12/12/2018 7:53 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/12/18 7:48 AM, Tim wrote:
“Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Schumer (D-N.Y.) had not expected the session to
be televised and repeatedly asked Trump to take the discussions
off-camera. But the president allowed the acrimonious encounter to
continue for nearly 20 minutes before kicking the media out of the Oval
Office. ...�


They’re evidently used to closed door and back roomÂ* deals and can’t
handle the wide open spaces..Â* nothing wrong with having the
discussion out in the open.


It was wonderful to watch Donald Bluster make a fool out of himself,
over and over. So, when is MEXICO going to pay for Trump's wall?


In the grander scheme of things Mexico is already beginning to absorb
at least some of the cost of a wall. They are accepting more and more
illegals within their country who would otherwise be in the USA getting
financial aid and benefits at taxpayer's expense. They are also
hardening their own borders to reduce the number of people traveling
across Mexico and sneaking into the USA.

It's important to remember that something like 65 percent (or more)
of these people don't qualify for asylum status but they must
be cared for, fed and housed while that determination process is made.

It's out of control and $5 billion is a very small price to pay
to reduce those who illegally enter and then turn themselves in
to be cared for only to be found to be not eligible for asylum status.
Forget what Pelosi, Schumer and other lefty politicians say and listen
to the border control agents who deal with this issue on a daily basis
and *all* agree that walls work.

By reducing that financial burden and on ICE operations, those who
enter legally at points of entry (which our laws require) are better
positioned to receive asylum status.

On 12/12/18 8:24 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/12/2018 7:53 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/12/18 7:48 AM, Tim wrote:
“Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Schumer (D-N.Y.) had not expected the session to
be televised and repeatedly asked Trump to take the discussions
off-camera. But the president allowed the acrimonious encounter to
continue for nearly 20 minutes before kicking the media out of the Oval
Office. ...�


They’re evidently used to closed door and back roomÂ* deals and can’t
handle the wide open spaces..Â* nothing wrong with having the
discussion out in the open.


It was wonderful to watch Donald Bluster make a fool out of himself,
over and over. So, when is MEXICO going to pay for Trump's wall?


In the grander scheme of things Mexico is already beginning to absorb
at least some of the cost of a wall.Â* They are accepting more and more
illegals within their country who would otherwise be in the USA getting
financial aid and benefits at taxpayer's expense.Â* They are also
hardening their own borders to reduce the number of people traveling
across Mexico and sneaking into the USA.

It's important to remember that something like 65 percent (or more)
of these people don't qualify for asylum status but they must
be cared for, fed and housed while that determination process is made.

It's out of control and $5 billion is a very small price to pay
to reduce those who illegally enter and then turn themselves in
to be cared for only to be found to be not eligible for asylum status.
Forget what Pelosi, Schumer and other lefty politicians say and listen
to the border control agents who deal with this issue on a daily basis
and *all* agree that walls work.

By reducing that financial burden and on ICE operations, those who
enter legally at points of entry (which our laws require) are better
positioned to receive asylum status.



So, when is Mexico going to pay for Trump's Wall?

On Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 8:24:16 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/12/2018 7:53 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/12/18 7:48 AM, Tim wrote:
“Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Schumer (D-N.Y.) had not expected the session to
be televised and repeatedly asked Trump to take the discussions
off-camera. But the president allowed the acrimonious encounter to
continue for nearly 20 minutes before kicking the media out of the Oval
Office. ...�


They’re evidently used to closed door and back roomÂ* deals and can’t
handle the wide open spaces..Â* nothing wrong with having the
discussion out in the open.


It was wonderful to watch Donald Bluster make a fool out of himself,
over and over. So, when is MEXICO going to pay for Trump's wall?


In the grander scheme of things Mexico is already beginning to absorb
at least some of the cost of a wall. They are accepting more and more
illegals within their country who would otherwise be in the USA getting
financial aid and benefits at taxpayer's expense. They are also
hardening their own borders to reduce the number of people traveling
across Mexico and sneaking into the USA.

It's important to remember that something like 65 percent (or more)
of these people don't qualify for asylum status but they must
be cared for, fed and housed while that determination process is made.

It's out of control and $5 billion is a very small price to pay
to reduce those who illegally enter and then turn themselves in
to be cared for only to be found to be not eligible for asylum status.
Forget what Pelosi, Schumer and other lefty politicians say and listen
to the border control agents who deal with this issue on a daily basis
and *all* agree that walls work.

Studies have shown that the wall would cost but a fraction of what illegal immigrants cost the US.

On Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 6:53:38 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/12/18 7:48 AM, Tim wrote:
“Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Schumer (D-N.Y.) had not expected the session to
be televised and repeatedly asked Trump to take the discussions
off-camera. But the president allowed the acrimonious encounter to
continue for nearly 20 minutes before kicking the media out of the Oval
Office. ...�


They’re evidently used to closed door and back room deals and can’t handle the wide open spaces.. nothing wrong with having the discussion out in the open.


It was wonderful to watch Donald Bluster make a fool out of himself,
over and over. So, when is MEXICO going to pay for Trump's wall?

Made a fool out of who?

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...nt-workers-are

Here, Harry. Yu don't mind somee cut n paste. Here,let me do some foer you....

"Pelosi complained that their conversation had "spiraled downward," and she said the emphasis should be on "how do we meet the needs of American people, who have needs. The economy has -- people are losing their jobs. The market's in a mood," she said.

Trump interrupted her: "Well, we have the lowest unemployment that we've had in 50 years," he said.

"Sixty people of the Republican Party have lost -- are losing their offices now because of the transition," Pelosi replied.

"And we gained in the Senate," Trump interrupted. "Nancy, we've gained in the Senate. Excuse me, did we win the Senate? We won the Senate," Trump said..

That was Schumer's cue: "When the president brags that he won North Dakota and Indiana, he's in real trouble," Schumer said.

"I did," Trump told Schumer. "We did. We did win North Dakota and Indiana."

U.S. Senate seats in both of those states flipped from Democrat to Republican in the midterms, giving Republicans a two-seat pickup and Democrats a two-seat loss.

Pelosi at that point objected to holding their conversation "in the public view." She called it "the most unfortunate thing."

"But it's not bad, Nancy. It's called transparency," Trump told her..."

BTW, Chuck should have noticed that Trump won way more than Indiana and North Dakota.

He won the presidency...

On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 20:22:01 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 6:53:38 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/12/18 7:48 AM, Tim wrote:
“Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Schumer (D-N.Y.) had not expected the session to
be televised and repeatedly asked Trump to take the discussions
off-camera. But the president allowed the acrimonious encounter to
continue for nearly 20 minutes before kicking the media out of the Oval
Office. ...�


They’re evidently used to closed door and back room deals and can’t handle the wide open spaces.. nothing wrong with having the discussion out in the open.


It was wonderful to watch Donald Bluster make a fool out of himself,
over and over. So, when is MEXICO going to pay for Trump's wall?

Made a fool out of who?

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...nt-workers-are

Here, Harry. Yu don't mind somee cut n paste. Here,let me do some foer you...

"Pelosi complained that their conversation had "spiraled downward," and she said the emphasis should be on "how do we meet the needs of American people, who have needs. The economy has -- people are losing their jobs. The market's in a mood," she said.

Trump interrupted her: "Well, we have the lowest unemployment that we've had in 50 years," he said.

"Sixty people of the Republican Party have lost -- are losing their offices now because of the transition," Pelosi replied.

"And we gained in the Senate," Trump interrupted. "Nancy, we've gained in the Senate. Excuse me, did we win the Senate? We won the Senate," Trump said.

That was Schumer's cue: "When the president brags that he won North Dakota and Indiana, he's in real trouble," Schumer said.

"I did," Trump told Schumer. "We did. We did win North Dakota and Indiana."

U.S. Senate seats in both of those states flipped from Democrat to Republican in the midterms, giving Republicans a two-seat pickup and Democrats a two-seat loss.

Pelosi at that point objected to holding their conversation "in the public view." She called it "the most unfortunate thing."

"But it's not bad, Nancy. It's called transparency," Trump told her..."

BTW, Chuck should have noticed that Trump won way more than Indiana and North Dakota.

He won the presidency...

I heard an interesting spin on this. By winning the Senate, all of the
freshly elected senators will still be there in 2024 when Trump limits
out and the Senate will be the ones to confirm nominations and judge
any impeachment.

On 12/12/2018 7:48 AM, Tim wrote:
“Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Schumer (D-N.Y.) had not expected the session to
be televised and repeatedly asked Trump to take the discussions
off-camera. But the president allowed the acrimonious encounter to
continue for nearly 20 minutes before kicking the media out of the Oval
Office. ...�


They’re evidently used to closed door and back room deals and can’t handle the wide open spaces.. nothing wrong with having the discussion out in the open.



Yup. Pelosi and Schumer were in panic mode. Kept looking over
nervously at the live TV cameras while begging Trump to "go private".

No! I think Trump did the right thing. Talk about it in the open
so every citizen who is interested can see for themselves what these
airheads are saying.

After the meeting both Pelosi and Schumer went back to their canned,
lefty spin of course when talking to the press.