On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 09:39:58 -0700 (PDT), Its Me
wrote:

On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 12:18:06 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/9/18 12:10 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 09:03:27 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/9/18 7:40 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/9/2018 7:22 AM, Tim wrote:

Just depends on who you want to listen to. flip the coin.

Trump is losing.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trum...ropped-1158786

Trump is winning.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/08/opini...nio/index.html




I watched the ceremonial swearing in of Justice Kavanaugh last evening.
When it concluded I continued watching Chris Matthews and his liberal
"panel" (MSNBC) go apocalyptic, especially about Trump's apology to
Kavanaugh and his family for having to endure what they went through
and finishing with, "Sir, you were found innocent".

I thought Matthews's head was going to explode along with Eugene
Robinson's.Â* They were attacking Trump with everything they had.

Obviously they totally missed a critical part.Â* Trump's comments
were written by a speechwriter.Â* He was reading them from a teleprompter
displayed on two large monitors in the back of the room.Â* There is no
question that his comments were specifically intended to deliver a
political punch in the nose to the Democrats who had found Kavanaugh
guilty with no collaborating evidence.

Well done.


It's been sad to watch your devolution into a complete Trump fanboy.
Anyone with a reasonable sense of decency recognizes Trump as the worst
human being to ever occupy the Oval Office.

Kavanaugh wasn't found innocent. There was no trial. There wasn't even a
decent investigation of the charges against him. And it doesn't matter
who wrote Trump's little speech because Trump delivered it, and that
makes it Trump's words.

If the Dems take the House, there will be serious and substantial
investigations of Trump and his gang of criminal cronies, and that
includes Kavanaugh. There's plenty of evidence Kavanaugh had a habit of
lying to Congress recently and in the distant past, and who really knows
what might turn up with a serious investigation of the sexual predator
charges against him.

I have to admit, though, it is funny to see a sexual predator like Trump
defending another sexual predator like Kavanaugh.

Too bad all of these investigations are coming up dry isn't it?
We have proof Donald had consensual relations with a number of high
profile women and that some were paid handsomely for it but the
predator claims seem to fade away for a lack of proof, just like
Kavanaugh. I understand you never heard an allegation against a
republican that you did not believe and democrats can do no wrong but
that only demonstrates your prejudice.


What investigations? There was a lip service investigation into
Kavanaugh's attempted rape and other misbehaviors, but nothing
substantial. Oh, wait, you think the FBI pseudo-investigation of
Kavanaugh directed by the White House and Repubs in the Senate was an
investigation... Yeah, just like the House investigation into Trump's
misdeeds with the Russians was an investigation. Right. Got it.

Let's see... you've got a crazy lady saying something happened 35 years ago, that she had exactly one beer and it was 100% him, but can't remember anything else like how she got there or got home, where or when it was, or even who was there. And there's not a single piece of evidence to back up the story. Non. Nada.

Then you have a federal judge who say's it didn't happen and about 100 people to back up his story. 7 FBI background checks. The lady's ex-boyfriend discredits much of her story. Oh, and did I mention... she's crazy.

Yeah, we got it.

It occurred to me that why would anyone take psychological advice or
education from someone who was so traumatized by such a minor incident
35 years ago that she still has PTSD about it?
If sher can't work this out for herself, how could she ever be
expected to understand how to work it out for anyone else?

It is like taking employment advice from Pete Best.

On 10/9/18 12:59 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 09:39:58 -0700 (PDT), Its Me
wrote:

On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 12:18:06 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/9/18 12:10 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 09:03:27 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/9/18 7:40 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/9/2018 7:22 AM, Tim wrote:

Just depends on who you want to listen to. flip the coin.

Trump is losing.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trum...ropped-1158786

Trump is winning.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/08/opini...nio/index.html




I watched the ceremonial swearing in of Justice Kavanaugh last evening.
When it concluded I continued watching Chris Matthews and his liberal
"panel" (MSNBC) go apocalyptic, especially about Trump's apology to
Kavanaugh and his family for having to endure what they went through
and finishing with, "Sir, you were found innocent".

I thought Matthews's head was going to explode along with Eugene
Robinson's.Â* They were attacking Trump with everything they had.

Obviously they totally missed a critical part.Â* Trump's comments
were written by a speechwriter.Â* He was reading them from a teleprompter
displayed on two large monitors in the back of the room.Â* There is no
question that his comments were specifically intended to deliver a
political punch in the nose to the Democrats who had found Kavanaugh
guilty with no collaborating evidence.

Well done.


It's been sad to watch your devolution into a complete Trump fanboy.
Anyone with a reasonable sense of decency recognizes Trump as the worst
human being to ever occupy the Oval Office.

Kavanaugh wasn't found innocent. There was no trial. There wasn't even a
decent investigation of the charges against him. And it doesn't matter
who wrote Trump's little speech because Trump delivered it, and that
makes it Trump's words.

If the Dems take the House, there will be serious and substantial
investigations of Trump and his gang of criminal cronies, and that
includes Kavanaugh. There's plenty of evidence Kavanaugh had a habit of
lying to Congress recently and in the distant past, and who really knows
what might turn up with a serious investigation of the sexual predator
charges against him.

I have to admit, though, it is funny to see a sexual predator like Trump
defending another sexual predator like Kavanaugh.

Too bad all of these investigations are coming up dry isn't it?
We have proof Donald had consensual relations with a number of high
profile women and that some were paid handsomely for it but the
predator claims seem to fade away for a lack of proof, just like
Kavanaugh. I understand you never heard an allegation against a
republican that you did not believe and democrats can do no wrong but
that only demonstrates your prejudice.


What investigations? There was a lip service investigation into
Kavanaugh's attempted rape and other misbehaviors, but nothing
substantial. Oh, wait, you think the FBI pseudo-investigation of
Kavanaugh directed by the White House and Repubs in the Senate was an
investigation... Yeah, just like the House investigation into Trump's
misdeeds with the Russians was an investigation. Right. Got it.

Let's see... you've got a crazy lady saying something happened 35 years ago, that she had exactly one beer and it was 100% him, but can't remember anything else like how she got there or got home, where or when it was, or even who was there. And there's not a single piece of evidence to back up the story. Non. Nada.

Then you have a federal judge who say's it didn't happen and about 100 people to back up his story. 7 FBI background checks. The lady's ex-boyfriend discredits much of her story. Oh, and did I mention... she's crazy.

Yeah, we got it.

It occurred to me that why would anyone take psychological advice or
education from someone who was so traumatized by such a minor incident
35 years ago that she still has PTSD about it?
If sher can't work this out for herself, how could she ever be
expected to understand how to work it out for anyone else?

It is like taking employment advice from Pete Best.


Yet another reason why your comments about mental illness/emotional
disturbances and treatments for them are such nonsense. You simply don't
really know anything. Attempted rape is NOT a minor incident. I don't
know what the law was back then but nowadays, attempted rape can get you
a life sentence.

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 13:02:35 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/9/18 12:59 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 09:39:58 -0700 (PDT), Its Me
wrote:

On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 12:18:06 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/9/18 12:10 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 09:03:27 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/9/18 7:40 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/9/2018 7:22 AM, Tim wrote:

Just depends on who you want to listen to. flip the coin.

Trump is losing.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trum...ropped-1158786

Trump is winning.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/08/opini...nio/index.html




I watched the ceremonial swearing in of Justice Kavanaugh last evening.
When it concluded I continued watching Chris Matthews and his liberal
"panel" (MSNBC) go apocalyptic, especially about Trump's apology to
Kavanaugh and his family for having to endure what they went through
and finishing with, "Sir, you were found innocent".

I thought Matthews's head was going to explode along with Eugene
Robinson's.* They were attacking Trump with everything they had.

Obviously they totally missed a critical part.* Trump's comments
were written by a speechwriter.* He was reading them from a teleprompter
displayed on two large monitors in the back of the room.* There is no
question that his comments were specifically intended to deliver a
political punch in the nose to the Democrats who had found Kavanaugh
guilty with no collaborating evidence.

Well done.


It's been sad to watch your devolution into a complete Trump fanboy.
Anyone with a reasonable sense of decency recognizes Trump as the worst
human being to ever occupy the Oval Office.

Kavanaugh wasn't found innocent. There was no trial. There wasn't even a
decent investigation of the charges against him. And it doesn't matter
who wrote Trump's little speech because Trump delivered it, and that
makes it Trump's words.

If the Dems take the House, there will be serious and substantial
investigations of Trump and his gang of criminal cronies, and that
includes Kavanaugh. There's plenty of evidence Kavanaugh had a habit of
lying to Congress recently and in the distant past, and who really knows
what might turn up with a serious investigation of the sexual predator
charges against him.

I have to admit, though, it is funny to see a sexual predator like Trump
defending another sexual predator like Kavanaugh.

Too bad all of these investigations are coming up dry isn't it?
We have proof Donald had consensual relations with a number of high
profile women and that some were paid handsomely for it but the
predator claims seem to fade away for a lack of proof, just like
Kavanaugh. I understand you never heard an allegation against a
republican that you did not believe and democrats can do no wrong but
that only demonstrates your prejudice.


What investigations? There was a lip service investigation into
Kavanaugh's attempted rape and other misbehaviors, but nothing
substantial. Oh, wait, you think the FBI pseudo-investigation of
Kavanaugh directed by the White House and Repubs in the Senate was an
investigation... Yeah, just like the House investigation into Trump's
misdeeds with the Russians was an investigation. Right. Got it.

Let's see... you've got a crazy lady saying something happened 35 years ago, that she had exactly one beer and it was 100% him, but can't remember anything else like how she got there or got home, where or when it was, or even who was there. And there's not a single piece of evidence to back up the story. Non. Nada.

Then you have a federal judge who say's it didn't happen and about 100 people to back up his story. 7 FBI background checks. The lady's ex-boyfriend discredits much of her story. Oh, and did I mention... she's crazy.

Yeah, we got it.

It occurred to me that why would anyone take psychological advice or
education from someone who was so traumatized by such a minor incident
35 years ago that she still has PTSD about it?
If sher can't work this out for herself, how could she ever be
expected to understand how to work it out for anyone else?

It is like taking employment advice from Pete Best.


Yet another reason why your comments about mental illness/emotional
disturbances and treatments for them are such nonsense. You simply don't
really know anything. Attempted rape is NOT a minor incident. I don't
know what the law was back then but nowadays, attempted rape can get you
a life sentence.

Oh, an unsubstantiated allegation of copping a feel now becomes attempted rape. Whoa, boy. You're
letting 'em carry you away. Has this become your theme song?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23ywNYOde4Y

12:18 PMJohn H
- show quoted text -
Oh, an unsubstantiated allegation of copping a feel now becomes attempted rape. Whoa, boy. You're
letting 'em carry you away. Has this become your theme song?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23ywNYOde4Y

........


Where or when was “rape� ever brought up anyhow? I’m amazed of the hyper speculation going on.

On 10/9/18 8:48 PM, Tim wrote:

12:18 PMJohn H
- show quoted text -
Oh, an unsubstantiated allegation of copping a feel now becomes attempted rape. Whoa, boy. You're
letting 'em carry you away. Has this become your theme song?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23ywNYOde4Y

.......


Where or when was “rape� ever brought up anyhow? I’m amazed of the hyper speculation going on.


Let's see. Kavanaugh and his buddy push the girl into a room, close the
door and Kavanaugh jumps on top of her to pin her down, starts pulling
her clothes, and holds his hand over her mouth so she can't scream. Your
kinda conservative.

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/9/18 8:48 PM, Tim wrote:

12:18 PMJohn H
- show quoted text -
Oh, an unsubstantiated allegation of copping a feel now becomes
attempted rape. Whoa, boy. You're
letting 'em carry you away. Has this become your theme song?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23ywNYOde4Y

.......


Where or when was “rape� ever brought up anyhow? I’m amazed of the
hyper speculation going on.


Let's see. Kavanaugh and his buddy push the girl into a room, close the
door and Kavanaugh jumps on top of her to pin her down, starts pulling
her clothes, and holds his hand over her mouth so she can't scream. Your
kinda conservative.


He was not the governor or employer who had police backup to molest the
women?

7:58 PMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Let's see. Kavanaugh and his buddy push the girl into a room, close the
door and Kavanaugh jumps on top of her to pin her down, starts pulling
her clothes, and holds his hand over her mouth so she can't scream. Your
kinda conservative.
.......
Her testimony had more holes than Swiss cheese. No way could it hold in a real court and you know it. *You’re* kinda liberal.

Tim wrote:

7:58 PMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Let's see. Kavanaugh and his buddy push the girl into a room, close the
door and Kavanaugh jumps on top of her to pin her down, starts pulling
her clothes, and holds his hand over her mouth so she can't scream. Your
kinda conservative.
......
Her testimony had more holes than Swiss cheese. No way could it hold in a
real court and you know it. *You’re* kinda liberal.


In court, the investigation and witnesses wouldn’t be under the control of
the White House and the old white farts who control the judiciary
committee.

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 20:58:06 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/9/18 8:48 PM, Tim wrote:

12:18 PMJohn H
- show quoted text -
Oh, an unsubstantiated allegation of copping a feel now becomes attempted rape. Whoa, boy. You're
letting 'em carry you away. Has this become your theme song?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23ywNYOde4Y

.......


Where or when was “rape� ever brought up anyhow? I’m amazed of the hyper speculation going on.


Let's see. Kavanaugh and his buddy push the girl into a room, close the
door and Kavanaugh jumps on top of her to pin her down, starts pulling
her clothes, and holds his hand over her mouth so she can't scream. Your
kinda conservative.

If two 17 year old boys really intended to rape that girl, they would
have raped her.
That is still speculation tho. At this point we have not even seen any
proof they were even there. There seem to be plenty of people who say
Kavanaugh wasn't there and nobody even remembers her.
I have no doubt she got drunk at a party somewhere and somebody groped
her. How she decided it must have been Kavanaugh is still
undetermined. Maybe she read Mark's book.

Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 10/9/18 8:48 PM, Tim wrote:

12:18 PMJohn H
- show quoted text -
Oh, an unsubstantiated allegation of copping a feel now becomes attempted rape. Whoa, boy. You're
letting 'em carry you away. Has this become your theme song?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23ywNYOde4Y

.......


Where or when was ?rape? ever brought up anyhow? I?m amazed of the hyper speculation going on.


Let's see. Kavanaugh and his buddy push the girl into a room, close the
door and Kavanaugh jumps on top of her to pin her down, starts pulling
her clothes, and holds his hand over her mouth so she can't scream. Your
kinda conservative.


Hearsay from an unstable, so called victim.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/