On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 10:45:50 -0800, "jps" wrote:

"bb" wrote in message
.. .
On 01 Nov 2003 16:00:06 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Heck, if I was a leader over there, I'd want that mad man out
of office in the worst way.

S'pose any of those foreign leaders have access to the internet?

http://www.newamericancentury.org/st...principles.htm

I can't imagine they do. Aren't they all just a half step above
animals? They just don't seem to understand it's unpatriotic not to
support Bush's agenda.

bb

OPEC is making sure Bush doesn't get an economic boost from lower oil
prices. I think we can depend on them to keep the economy from really
taking off.

Is it your fondest wish that the economy not take off?


John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 14:09:20 -0500, JohnH
wrote:


OPEC is making sure Bush doesn't get an economic boost from lower oil
prices. I think we can depend on them to keep the economy from really
taking off.

Is it your fondest wish that the economy not take off?

I don't know about it being in the catagory of "fondish wish", but I
could endure another year of this economy if it means getting rid of
George. Heck, after three years in the gutter, one more doesn't hurt
much more. I honestly can't think of one single thing positive this
president has done.

I guess, keeping to the intent of the thread, fondest wish would be to
get rid of him now, have the economy recover to where it was when he
started, and put about four million more people to work, and somehow
reverse the Iraq quagmire. Hey, one can dream, can't they?

bb

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 10:45:50 -0800, "jps" wrote:

"bb" wrote in message
.. .
On 01 Nov 2003 16:00:06 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Heck, if I was a leader over there, I'd want that mad man out
of office in the worst way.

S'pose any of those foreign leaders have access to the internet?

http://www.newamericancentury.org/st...principles.htm

I can't imagine they do. Aren't they all just a half step above
animals? They just don't seem to understand it's unpatriotic not to
support Bush's agenda.

bb

OPEC is making sure Bush doesn't get an economic boost from lower oil
prices. I think we can depend on them to keep the economy from really
taking off.

Is it your fondest wish that the economy not take off?


John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Yep. It is the last thing the libs want to see before the election. They
do not have the country's interest at heart, only a deep desire to defeat
GWB.

Jim-- wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 10:45:50 -0800, "jps" wrote:

"bb" wrote in message
.. .
On 01 Nov 2003 16:00:06 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Heck, if I was a leader over there, I'd want that mad man out
of office in the worst way.

S'pose any of those foreign leaders have access to the internet?

http://www.newamericancentury.org/st...principles.htm

I can't imagine they do. Aren't they all just a half step above
animals? They just don't seem to understand it's unpatriotic not to
support Bush's agenda.

bb

OPEC is making sure Bush doesn't get an economic boost from lower oil
prices. I think we can depend on them to keep the economy from really
taking off.

Is it your fondest wish that the economy not take off?


John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Yep. It is the last thing the libs want to see before the election. They
do not have the country's interest at heart, only a deep desire to defeat
GWB.



Be sure and let us know when Bush's "economic policies" add back three
million decent jobs, the number we've lost since he was appointed POTUS.
At that point, we'll be even with where we were, job-wise, when Clinton
left office.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Jim-- wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 10:45:50 -0800, "jps" wrote:

"bb" wrote in message
.. .
On 01 Nov 2003 16:00:06 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Heck, if I was a leader over there, I'd want that mad man out
of office in the worst way.

S'pose any of those foreign leaders have access to the internet?

http://www.newamericancentury.org/st...principles.htm

I can't imagine they do. Aren't they all just a half step above
animals? They just don't seem to understand it's unpatriotic not to
support Bush's agenda.

bb

OPEC is making sure Bush doesn't get an economic boost from lower oil
prices. I think we can depend on them to keep the economy from really
taking off.

Is it your fondest wish that the economy not take off?


John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Yep. It is the last thing the libs want to see before the election.
They
do not have the country's interest at heart, only a deep desire to
defeat
GWB.



Be sure and let us know when Bush's "economic policies" add back three
million decent jobs, the number we've lost since he was appointed POTUS.
At that point, we'll be even with where we were, job-wise, when Clinton
left office.


Actually thanks to Bush's economic policies the economy is rebounding at a
remarkable rate.

The jobs will come, as they have started to do already.

On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 16:59:25 -0500, Jim-- wrote:

Actually thanks to Bush's economic policies the economy is rebounding at a
remarkable rate.

The jobs will come, as they have started to do already.

He's still on track to be the first President since Hoover, to produce a
net job loss.

thunder wrote:

On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 16:59:25 -0500, Jim-- wrote:

Actually thanks to Bush's economic policies the economy is rebounding at a
remarkable rate.

The jobs will come, as they have started to do already.

He's still on track to be the first President since Hoover, to produce a
net job loss.


What kinds of jobs would a Bush product? 7-11 jobs? Part-time jobs?
Low-paying jobs with no bennies?

Well, of course:such jobs are the Republican stock in trade...for the
rest of us.

"Jim--" wrote in message
...

Yep. It is the last thing the libs want to see before the election. They
do not have the country's interest at heart, only a deep desire to defeat
GWB.

And your party spent three years trying to dismantle a President's term
based lying about a blow job.

The dems have nothing on the Republicans when it comes to wasting the
country's resources.

Yep. It is the last thing the libs want to see before the election. They
do not have the country's interest at heart, only a deep desire to defeat
GWB.

You need to change that to "some libs".

The economy has been screwed up for far too long. We need a bit of breathing
room before the economic anthrax of deficit spending accelerated by
irresponsible tax cuts starts coming home to roost.

If the people of the US want to reelect a man who does not read, cannot speak,
and stages elaborate lies with no fear of reprisal, they deserve what they get.

I know the elaborate lie charge is pretty mean, so here's the elaborate lie I'm
referring to......it's been well documented.

An entire aircraft carrier filled with servicemen and women was diverted from
its course back to its home Naval Base in Everett, Washington, and ordered to
steam in circles off the California coast.

Local residents reported that the circling carrier could easily be seen from
the shore.

Bush scurries across the country, tosses his civilian garb into a closet, and
changes into a military looking flight jacket. He's going to visit the carrier.

Normal protocol for the POTUS when visiting an aircraft carrier would be to
land on the deck in Marine One (the presidential helicopter).

Bush arrived on the carrier in a fighter plane. Some simple dupes around the
country have been allowed to believe that he acutally landed the aircraft.

Here's the big lie: Why was Bush arriving by fighter plane? "Because the
carrier is so far out to sea it exceeds the range of the helicopter"

Yeah right. If our helicopters don't have more range than the several miles the
AC carrier was circling off the coast of Californina, we better get the heck
out of Iraq, Afghanistan, and the rest of our colonies ASAP.

Instead of being concerned that their president was lying to the entire world,
and telling such an obvious, cheap, and rickety lie to boot.....the right wing
clapped, cheered, hooted, and hollered for Boy George. Oh boy, George. :-(

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Yep. It is the last thing the libs want to see before the election.
They
do not have the country's interest at heart, only a deep desire to
defeat
GWB.

You need to change that to "some libs".

The economy has been screwed up for far too long. We need a bit of
breathing
room before the economic anthrax of deficit spending accelerated by
irresponsible tax cuts starts coming home to roost.

"the irresponsible tax cuts?" You seem to forget that the states are slowly
increasing their taxes to make up for the reduced federal grab of your hard
earned income. This is a good thing because it will put those responsible
for taking your money closer to you where you can have a bigger effect on
their ability to take your money. The closer your elected officials are to
you the more pressure you can bring to bear on their votes.

And, the biggest bonus is that if you live in a state that is not taxing you
enough you can move to a state that taxes you to the level you want.


If the people of the US want to reelect a man who does not read, cannot
speak,
and stages elaborate lies with no fear of reprisal, they deserve what they
get.

The bonus is that when GWB is reelected it will cause you pain and anguish
for another four years. Pay back is a bitch.

I know the elaborate lie charge is pretty mean, so here's the elaborate
lie I'm
referring to......it's been well documented.

An entire aircraft carrier filled with servicemen and women was diverted
from
its course back to its home Naval Base in Everett, Washington, and ordered
to
steam in circles off the California coast.

And, your point is?

Local residents reported that the circling carrier could easily be seen
from
the shore.

Bull crap, you of all people should know that you can see more than 15 miles
over the horizon.

Bush scurries across the country, tosses his civilian garb into a closet,
and
changes into a military looking flight jacket. He's going to visit the
carrier.

And this is differnet from the previous presidents in what way?

Normal protocol for the POTUS when visiting an aircraft carrier would be
to
land on the deck in Marine One (the presidential helicopter).

Bush arrived on the carrier in a fighter plane. Some simple dupes around
the
country have been allowed to believe that he acutally landed the aircraft.

Aint it great to be the President?

Here's the big lie: Why was Bush arriving by fighter plane? "Because the
carrier is so far out to sea it exceeds the range of the helicopter"

Yeah right. If our helicopters don't have more range than the several
miles the
AC carrier was circling off the coast of Californina, we better get the
heck
out of Iraq, Afghanistan, and the rest of our colonies ASAP.

Instead of being concerned that their president was lying to the entire
world,
and telling such an obvious, cheap, and rickety lie to boot.....the right
wing
clapped, cheered, hooted, and hollered for Boy George. Oh boy, George. :-(

And we will be cheering more after the next election too.