On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 18:11:08 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

What
has Byrd bought for West Virginia lately?


Start your own thread, dude, this one's about Bush.

bb

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 14:16:56 -0800, "jps" wrote:

"Jim--" wrote in message
...

Yep. It is the last thing the libs want to see before the election.
They
do not have the country's interest at heart, only a deep desire to
defeat
GWB.

And your party spent three years trying to dismantle a President's term
based lying about a blow job.

The dems have nothing on the Republicans when it comes to wasting the
country's resources.

You, jps, have just stumbled on the one thing the 'dems' do to perfection.
What
has Byrd bought for West Virginia lately?


Over the past decade your party has taken the lead in wasting money and done
it in style.

Those kids you're teaching right now will have to foot the bill. Too bad
there won't be any money available to rebuild our ailing schools before
they're adults.

jps wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 14:16:56 -0800, "jps" wrote:

"Jim--" wrote in message
...

Yep. It is the last thing the libs want to see before the election.
They
do not have the country's interest at heart, only a deep desire to
defeat
GWB.

Working to defeat Bush is demonstrating you have the country's best
interests at heart.




Those kids you're teaching right now will have to foot the bill. Too bad
there won't be any money available to rebuild our ailing schools before
they're adults.



My recollection is that JohnH is a substitute teacher who fills in for a
day or two for a teacher who is ill. If that is the case, one wonders
whether he actually is teaching classes or simply babysitting.

On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 16:44:50 -0500, Jim-- wrote:


They
do not have the country's interest at heart, only a deep desire to defeat
GWB.

LOL, I would say defeating GWB *is* in the interest of the country. I
also hope the economy is turning around, now.

On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 16:59:25 -0500, Jim-- wrote:

Actually thanks to Bush's economic policies the economy is rebounding at a
remarkable rate.

The jobs will come, as they have started to do already.

He's still on track to be the first President since Hoover, to produce a
net job loss.

thunder wrote:

On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 16:59:25 -0500, Jim-- wrote:

Actually thanks to Bush's economic policies the economy is rebounding at a
remarkable rate.

The jobs will come, as they have started to do already.

He's still on track to be the first President since Hoover, to produce a
net job loss.


What kinds of jobs would a Bush product? 7-11 jobs? Part-time jobs?
Low-paying jobs with no bennies?

Well, of course:such jobs are the Republican stock in trade...for the
rest of us.

"jps" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
k.net...

If he just wanted to prop up his numbers, just had to charge HK under
the
Patriot act. You boy showed the way in Wag The Dog. How many people
still
engage in Bosnia?


How many were killed in Bosnia and how much did it cost.

Stupid comparison for you to bring up.



Lots of those civilians you seem to worry about in Iraq. What was the
danger to the USA from Bosnia? How much has Bosnia cost us?

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

"jps" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
k.net...

If he just wanted to prop up his numbers, just had to charge HK under
the
Patriot act. You boy showed the way in Wag The Dog. How many people
still
engage in Bosnia?


How many were killed in Bosnia and how much did it cost.

Stupid comparison for you to bring up.



Lots of those civilians you seem to worry about in Iraq. What was the
danger to the USA from Bosnia? How much has Bosnia cost us?


We didn't lie our way into that war. We went there to stop further ethnic
cleansing. Casualties were extremely low in comparison to Iraq, cost was
infintesimal in comparison to Iraq.

Orders of magnitude difference in all respects: intent, losses, cost.

On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 19:21:29 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

jps wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 14:16:56 -0800, "jps" wrote:

"Jim--" wrote in message
...

Yep. It is the last thing the libs want to see before the election.
They
do not have the country's interest at heart, only a deep desire to
defeat
GWB.

Working to defeat Bush is demonstrating you have the country's best
interests at heart.




Those kids you're teaching right now will have to foot the bill. Too bad
there won't be any money available to rebuild our ailing schools before
they're adults.



My recollection is that JohnH is a substitute teacher who fills in for a
day or two for a teacher who is ill. If that is the case, one wonders
whether he actually is teaching classes or simply babysitting.

Depends on the subject, Harry. If the subject is math, then I teach whatever is
on tap for that day. If the subject is art, then I mostly babysit. But, I'm a
hell of a good babysitter!
John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Yep. It is the last thing the libs want to see before the election.
They
do not have the country's interest at heart, only a deep desire to
defeat
GWB.

You need to change that to "some libs".

The economy has been screwed up for far too long. We need a bit of
breathing
room before the economic anthrax of deficit spending accelerated by
irresponsible tax cuts starts coming home to roost.

"the irresponsible tax cuts?" You seem to forget that the states are slowly
increasing their taxes to make up for the reduced federal grab of your hard
earned income. This is a good thing because it will put those responsible
for taking your money closer to you where you can have a bigger effect on
their ability to take your money. The closer your elected officials are to
you the more pressure you can bring to bear on their votes.

And, the biggest bonus is that if you live in a state that is not taxing you
enough you can move to a state that taxes you to the level you want.


If the people of the US want to reelect a man who does not read, cannot
speak,
and stages elaborate lies with no fear of reprisal, they deserve what they
get.

The bonus is that when GWB is reelected it will cause you pain and anguish
for another four years. Pay back is a bitch.

I know the elaborate lie charge is pretty mean, so here's the elaborate
lie I'm
referring to......it's been well documented.

An entire aircraft carrier filled with servicemen and women was diverted
from
its course back to its home Naval Base in Everett, Washington, and ordered
to
steam in circles off the California coast.

And, your point is?

Local residents reported that the circling carrier could easily be seen
from
the shore.

Bull crap, you of all people should know that you can see more than 15 miles
over the horizon.

Bush scurries across the country, tosses his civilian garb into a closet,
and
changes into a military looking flight jacket. He's going to visit the
carrier.

And this is differnet from the previous presidents in what way?

Normal protocol for the POTUS when visiting an aircraft carrier would be
to
land on the deck in Marine One (the presidential helicopter).

Bush arrived on the carrier in a fighter plane. Some simple dupes around
the
country have been allowed to believe that he acutally landed the aircraft.

Aint it great to be the President?

Here's the big lie: Why was Bush arriving by fighter plane? "Because the
carrier is so far out to sea it exceeds the range of the helicopter"

Yeah right. If our helicopters don't have more range than the several
miles the
AC carrier was circling off the coast of Californina, we better get the
heck
out of Iraq, Afghanistan, and the rest of our colonies ASAP.

Instead of being concerned that their president was lying to the entire
world,
and telling such an obvious, cheap, and rickety lie to boot.....the right
wing
clapped, cheered, hooted, and hollered for Boy George. Oh boy, George. :-(

And we will be cheering more after the next election too.