The Justice Department has agreed to expand their investigation,
agreeing to look into "any irregularities" in FBI tactics after
Trump suggested that an FBI informant was "implanted" within
his campaign for political purposes.

Democratic leaders heads' are exploding over this one.

https://tinyurl.com/ydxjehjh

On 5/21/18 6:53 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


The Justice Department has agreed to expand their investigation,
agreeing to look into "any irregularities" in FBI tactics after
Trump suggested that an FBI informant was "implanted" within
his campaign for political purposes.

Democratic leaders heads' are exploding over this one.

https://tinyurl.com/ydxjehjh


Fake news from you...I haven't seen any Democratic Party leaders
overreacting to this news.

And, from the article you quoted:

Neither Trump nor his new lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, provided any evidence
of government infiltration into Trump’s presidential campaign.

The New York Times, citing people familiar with the matter, reported
that the FBI sent an informant to talk to two Trump campaign advisers,
Carter Page and George Papadopoulos, after the agency received evidence
that the two men had suspicious contacts linked to Russia during the
campaign.

Papadopoulos pleaded guilty last fall to lying to FBI agents about his
contacts with Russia.


BTW, I just read an article by a former Congressman from Missouri, a
Republican, who thinks Trump has committed treason. And there are
reports that other foreign countries offered illegal help to the Trump
campaign via sleazeball Erik Prince.

On 5/21/2018 7:02 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/21/18 6:53 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


The Justice Department has agreed to expand their investigation,
agreeing to look into "any irregularities" in FBI tactics after
Trump suggested that an FBI informant was "implanted" within
his campaign for political purposes.

Democratic leaders heads' are exploding over this one.

https://tinyurl.com/ydxjehjh


Fake news from you...I haven't seen any Democratic Party leaders
overreacting to this news.

And, from the article you quoted:

Neither Trump nor his new lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, provided any evidence
of government infiltration into Trump’s presidential campaign.

The New York Times, citing people familiar with the matter, reported
that the FBI sent an informant to talk to two Trump campaign advisers,
Carter Page and George Papadopoulos, after the agency received evidence
that the two men had suspicious contacts linked to Russia during the
campaign.

Papadopoulos pleaded guilty last fall to lying to FBI agents about his
contacts with Russia.


BTW, I just read an article by a former Congressman from Missouri, a
Republican, who thinks Trump has committed treason. And there are
reports that other foreign countries offered illegal help to the Trump
campaign via sleazeball Erik Prince.



I also saw the former Republican Congressman on MSNBC a little while
ago. Bit of a stretch, doncha think? It's all his "opinion" and he's
obviously an establishment never-Trumper.

Going back to Trump's demand for the Justice Department to look into
the FBI informant activities. More to this than meetings involving
Page and Papadopoulos. It's added to the about to be released AG's
report. You need to do more than read the NYTimes to see the various
Democrat's reactions.

Oh ... after almost two years of "investigations" by Congress and now
a special council none have provided any evidence of collusion with
the Russians.

If Trump used his Russian connections to sway the election ... exactly
how did he manage that? He won the electoral vote. He won the
election, much to the surprise (and dismay) of many. This, in spite
of the famous dossier that the Hillary campaign paid for after
Trump clinched the Republican nomination.

On Mon, 21 May 2018 19:22:58 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 5/21/2018 7:02 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/21/18 6:53 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


The Justice Department has agreed to expand their investigation,
agreeing to look into "any irregularities" in FBI tactics after
Trump suggested that an FBI informant was "implanted" within
his campaign for political purposes.

Democratic leaders heads' are exploding over this one.

https://tinyurl.com/ydxjehjh


Fake news from you...I haven't seen any Democratic Party leaders
overreacting to this news.

And, from the article you quoted:

Neither Trump nor his new lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, provided any evidence
of government infiltration into Trump’s presidential campaign.

The New York Times, citing people familiar with the matter, reported
that the FBI sent an informant to talk to two Trump campaign advisers,
Carter Page and George Papadopoulos, after the agency received evidence
that the two men had suspicious contacts linked to Russia during the
campaign.

Papadopoulos pleaded guilty last fall to lying to FBI agents about his
contacts with Russia.


BTW, I just read an article by a former Congressman from Missouri, a
Republican, who thinks Trump has committed treason. And there are
reports that other foreign countries offered illegal help to the Trump
campaign via sleazeball Erik Prince.



I also saw the former Republican Congressman on MSNBC a little while
ago. Bit of a stretch, doncha think? It's all his "opinion" and he's
obviously an establishment never-Trumper.

Going back to Trump's demand for the Justice Department to look into
the FBI informant activities. More to this than meetings involving
Page and Papadopoulos. It's added to the about to be released AG's
report. You need to do more than read the NYTimes to see the various
Democrat's reactions.

Oh ... after almost two years of "investigations" by Congress and now
a special council none have provided any evidence of collusion with
the Russians.

If Trump used his Russian connections to sway the election ... exactly
how did he manage that? He won the electoral vote. He won the
election, much to the surprise (and dismay) of many. This, in spite
of the famous dossier that the Hillary campaign paid for after
Trump clinched the Republican nomination.


I wonder why they don't call the dossier "British" meddling in the
election. Wasn't it assembled by a British spy?

On 5/21/18 7:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/21/2018 7:02 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/21/18 6:53 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


The Justice Department has agreed to expand their investigation,
agreeing to look into "any irregularities" in FBI tactics after
Trump suggested that an FBI informant was "implanted" within
his campaign for political purposes.

Democratic leaders heads' are exploding over this one.

https://tinyurl.com/ydxjehjh


Fake news from you...I haven't seen any Democratic Party leaders
overreacting to this news.

And, from the article you quoted:

Neither Trump nor his new lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, provided any evidence
of government infiltration into Trump’s presidential campaign.

The New York Times, citing people familiar with the matter, reported
that the FBI sent an informant to talk to two Trump campaign advisers,
Carter Page and George Papadopoulos, after the agency received
evidence that the two men had suspicious contacts linked to Russia
during the campaign.

Papadopoulos pleaded guilty last fall to lying to FBI agents about his
contacts with Russia.


BTW, I just read an article by a former Congressman from Missouri, a
Republican, who thinks Trump has committed treason. And there are
reports that other foreign countries offered illegal help to the Trump
campaign via sleazeball Erik Prince.



I also saw the former Republican Congressman on MSNBC a little while
ago.Â* Bit of a stretch, doncha think?Â* It's all his "opinion" and he's
obviously an establishment never-Trumper.

Going back to Trump's demand for the Justice Department to look into
the FBI informant activities.Â* More to this than meetings involving
Page and Papadopoulos.Â* It's added to the about to be released AG's
report.Â* You need to do more than read the NYTimes to see the various
Democrat's reactions.

Oh ... after almost two years of "investigations" by Congress and now
a special council none have provided any evidence of collusion with
the Russians.

If Trump used his Russian connections to sway the election ... exactly
how did he manage that?Â*Â* He won the electoral vote.Â* He won the
election, much to the surprise (and dismay) of many.Â* This, in spite
of the famous dossier that the Hillary campaign paid for after
Trump clinched the Republican nomination.



The House investigation was a fraud, derailed by Nunez. The Senate
inquiry is only a little better. The Repubs are protecting their boy,
and Nunez was leaking info to the Trump Admin. Oh, and if there is a
real AG report, it'll be fake news from The Jeff, probably the worst AG
in the history of the republic.