![]() |
Lapierre
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:27:09 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: 11:34 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - Ahh, shootouts coming in Ohio public schools of the kind no one wants. Wonderful. ..... It’s already a one way gun fight, Harry. It might be a bit better than throwing books and staple guns back at the perp. Actually if they had one of these under every desk a shooter might look for a softer target. Imagine 160 of these babies from 40 kids coming at your head in 10-20 seconds. http://gfretwell.com/ftp/Active%20sh...onse%20kit.jpg It would be like the "stoning scene" in the life of brian. |
Lapierre
|
Lapierre
wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:27:09 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: 11:34 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - Ahh, shootouts coming in Ohio public schools of the kind no one wants. Wonderful. ..... It’s already a one way gun fight, Harry. It might be a bit better than throwing books and staple guns back at the perp. Actually if they had one of these under every desk a shooter might look for a softer target. Imagine 160 of these babies from 40 kids coming at your head in 10-20 seconds. http://gfretwell.com/ftp/Active%20sh...onse%20kit.jpg It would be like the "stoning scene" in the life of brian. Maybe if the kids and teachers were armed like Harry’s picture, Boko Haram and school shooters would have a hard, short life. |
Lapierre
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:58:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/2/2018 12:34 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/22/18 12:15 PM, Tim wrote: Keyser Soze - show quoted text - While we are "hardening schools," we'll have to harden shopping centers, churches, outdoor concert venues, parking lots, et cetera. The idea of having a policeman or armed teaching guarding an entire school is laughable. Most schools are pretty large, multi-floor buildings. ... Really? https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn...iff/index.html Ahh, shootouts coming in Ohio public schools of the kind no one wants. Wonderful. Watching the second day of meetings with Trump today. He's coming down hard on the side of arming certain qualified teachers, janitors, ex-military etc. to create an "offensive" defense. He praises the NRA although he has differences with what Wayne LaPierre advocated today. It is obvious he is hell bent for election (pun not intended) to do something about school mass shootings. Good. Let him do something. I don't recall a case of a teacher shooting a bunch of kids (not that they wouldn't want to every now and then), so let those qualified be armed - secretly, of course. |
Lapierre
On 2/22/2018 4:47 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:58:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/2/2018 12:34 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/22/18 12:15 PM, Tim wrote: Keyser Soze - show quoted text - While we are "hardening schools," we'll have to harden shopping centers, churches, outdoor concert venues, parking lots, et cetera. The idea of having a policeman or armed teaching guarding an entire school is laughable. Most schools are pretty large, multi-floor buildings. ... Really? https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn...iff/index.html Ahh, shootouts coming in Ohio public schools of the kind no one wants. Wonderful. Watching the second day of meetings with Trump today. He's coming down hard on the side of arming certain qualified teachers, janitors, ex-military etc. to create an "offensive" defense. He praises the NRA although he has differences with what Wayne LaPierre advocated today. It is obvious he is hell bent for election (pun not intended) to do something about school mass shootings. Good. Let him do something. I don't recall a case of a teacher shooting a bunch of kids (not that they wouldn't want to every now and then), so let those qualified be armed - secretly, of course. Given the lack of any other serious options, I have no problem with his proposal. At least something would be tried. |
Lapierre
On 2/22/18 5:08 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/22/2018 4:47 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:58:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/2/2018 12:34 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/22/18 12:15 PM, Tim wrote: Keyser Soze - show quoted text - While we are "hardening schools," we'll have to harden shopping centers, churches, outdoor concert venues, parking lots, et cetera. The idea of having a policeman or armed teaching guarding an entire school is laughable. Most schools are pretty large, multi-floor buildings. ... Really? https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn...iff/index.html Ahh, shootouts coming in Ohio public schools of the kind no one wants. Wonderful. Watching the second day of meetings with Trump today.Â* He's coming down hard on the side of arming certain qualified teachers, janitors, ex-military etc. to create an "offensive"Â* defense.Â*Â* He praises the NRA although he has differences with what Wayne LaPierre advocated today. It is obvious he is hell bent for election (pun not intended) to do something about school mass shootings. Good. Let him do something. I don't recall a case of a teacher shooting a bunch of kids (not that they wouldn't want to every now and then), so let those qualified be armed - secretly, of course. Given the lack of any other serious options, I have no problem with his proposal.Â* At least something would be tried. Yes, the NRA would love to see more firearms sold, more ammo sold, more firearms in the hands of more people (teachers) and, hell, if a school is still shot up, well, there weren't enough armed teachers at that school, eh? The NRA is not offering a "serious" option. |
Lapierre
On 2/22/2018 5:58 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/22/18 5:08 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/22/2018 4:47 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:58:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/2/2018 12:34 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/22/18 12:15 PM, Tim wrote: Keyser Soze - show quoted text - While we are "hardening schools," we'll have to harden shopping centers, churches, outdoor concert venues, parking lots, et cetera. The idea of having a policeman or armed teaching guarding an entire school is laughable. Most schools are pretty large, multi-floor buildings. ... Really? https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn...iff/index.html Ahh, shootouts coming in Ohio public schools of the kind no one wants. Wonderful. Watching the second day of meetings with Trump today.Â* He's coming down hard on the side of arming certain qualified teachers, janitors, ex-military etc. to create an "offensive"Â* defense.Â*Â* He praises the NRA although he has differences with what Wayne LaPierre advocated today. It is obvious he is hell bent for election (pun not intended) to do something about school mass shootings. Good. Let him do something. I don't recall a case of a teacher shooting a bunch of kids (not that they wouldn't want to every now and then), so let those qualified be armed - secretly, of course. Given the lack of any other serious options, I have no problem with his proposal.Â* At least something would be tried. Yes, the NRA would love to see more firearms sold, more ammo sold, more firearms in the hands of more people (teachers) and, hell, if a school is still shot up, well, there weren't enough armed teachers at that school, eh? The NRA is not offering a "serious" option. No serious options are being offered. Even you acknowledged that the mental health and reporting avenue is too "complex" to address in a reasonable period of time. Gun lovers won't stand for any kind of restrictions of their rights. Politicians (even those of your party) won't touch the subject with a ten foot pole. Lots of talk, then it dies down until the next mass shooting. Given the lack of viable, timely and effective options, the best I've heard so far is reducing the response time from 5 to 10 minutes to less than a minute. If that means training and arming volunteer teachers and school administrators, it's better than nothing. Nobody should be forced or required to be armed. Perhaps volunteer ex-law enforcement or qualified and well screened ex-military could add to the protection on a part-time, rotating basis. There are risks of course. The arriving police may mistake an armed teacher as a "bad" guy. Maybe some form of easily and quickly identity confirmation could be conceived. Not ideal, but better than nothing for now. |
Lapierre
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:45:48 -0500, John H.
wrote: On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:42:00 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:15:49 -0500, Keyser Soze While we are "hardening schools," we'll have to harden shopping centers, churches, outdoor concert venues, parking lots, et cetera. The idea of having a policeman or armed teaching guarding an entire school is laughable. Most schools are pretty large, multi-floor buildings. I tend to agree but in Florida there is usually only one unlocked door from the outside, the one in the lobby. Either someone blocked another door open or this guy came in with the other students, carrying a rifle. Either are possible I suppose. I do agree that we need to control the nuts. Eliminating soft targets is pretty much impossible and eliminating potential weapons will just be a whack a mole game, simply trying to prevent the last attack, not the next one. Or someone could have opened a side door for him at a pre-selected time. That person should be charged with murder too if that is what happened. There is video in these schools so we should know that by now. That is really the easiest way to "harden" the schools anyway. Just increase the number of cameras and be able to isolate a shooter with doors that can be closed and locked remotely. That along with notification systems would do more than armed guards. If they can monitor the shooter from a central location and send the video to the cops along with exactly where the guy is, taking him will be a lot easier. If the teachers know immediately to lock the classroom door and get everyone behind the safe line (an area that can't be seen from the hall), they can just hunker down and wait. |
Lapierre
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com