Remember Me?
Menu
Home
Search
Today's Posts
Home
Search
Today's Posts
BoatBanter.com
»
rec.boats
»
General
>
Kids Say the Darndest Things
Reply
LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
#
1
posted to rec.boats
Bill[_12_]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,553
Kids Say the Darndest Things
John H. wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 15:34:05 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/25/2018 3:25 PM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 14:41:53 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/25/2018 2:08 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/25/18 1:33 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/25/2018 12:55 PM,
wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:05:10 -0500, John H.
wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 19:43:52 -0500,
wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 16:46:21 -0500, John H.
wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 13:03:42 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:
On 2/24/18 12:03 PM,
wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 07:17:42 -0500, John H.
wrote:
I could see making an exception for an
individual who has a DD 214 with the honorable discharge
I would grant that exception to anything that has an age limit
on it.
Charles Whitman was honorably discharged from the Marines. Lee
Harvey
Oswald received a hardship discharge from the Marines. Timothy
McVeigh
was honorably discharged from the Army.
Obviously, an honorable discharge wouldn't catch all the deviants.
But how many of them used the
weapons under discussion to shoot kids in the schools under
discussion?
Well Whitman used a rifle to shoot students but it was a bolt action,
as was Oswald's., McVeigh didn't use a gun at all and racked up a much
higher death count. I am not really sure what point they are making in
an AR 15 rant. It really sounds more like my argument that banning ARs
is pretty meaningless.
Ask Harry. It was his rant against an honorable discharge.
I tend to ignore his anti military rants. I understand that if he had
served, that would be all we heard about.
It's obvious Harry knows very little about the military other than
what he's been told or heard.Â* He has already proven how easily he is
influenced by others.Â* He parrots daily the latest DNC talking points.
My point was that a honorable discharge shouldn't by itself be the
qualifier for obtaining a firearm. The discharge in the cases I cited
was not an indicator of decent behavior going forward. An age qualifier
of 21 plus a good quality background check are more significant.
I've lost what the original proposition was but I don't disagree with you.
I had proposed a higher age requirement, at least 21, unless the
individual had an honorary
discharge DD 214.
I wonder how many service members are discharged before turning 21
anyway, but I understand your point. Military service matures most.
Very few, I'd reckon.
We lost one in basic. Medical discharge. He told them about a bad
shoulder and they still enlisted him. Doing a push-up shoulder
separation.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Show Printable Version
Search this Thread
:
Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode
Switch to Threaded Mode
Posting Rules
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
Off
HTML code is
Off
Trackbacks
are
On
Pingbacks
are
On
Refbacks
are
On
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bye Bye, Kids!
Capt. Rob
ASA
1
July 8th 06
07:43 AM
Later, Kids...
Bobsprit
ASA
4
June 30th 04
01:25 PM
Later, Kids!
Bobsprit
ASA
0
June 18th 04
06:04 PM
Bye Kids!
Bobsprit
ASA
6
September 6th 03
12:47 PM
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
10:31 PM
.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
Contact Us
BoatBanter Home
Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks