Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,424
Default Kayla Moore...

On 12/12/17 1:35 PM, Tim wrote:
Its Me
- show quoted text -
No, not in any sense.

"It is widely recognized that the attributive use of the noun Jew, in phrases such as Jew lawyer or Jew ethics, is both vulgar and highly offensive. In such contexts Jewish is the only acceptable possibility. Some people, however, have become so wary of this construction that they have extended the stigma to any use of Jew as a noun, a practice that carries risks of its own. In a sentence such as There are now several Jews on the council, which is unobjectionable, the substitution of a circumlocution like Jewish people or persons of Jewish background may in itself cause offense for seeming to imply that Jew has a negative connotation when used as a noun."

Some folks just want to be offended, or are looking too hard for offensive things.

——

Though the Italian settlements in St. Louis is now called “The Hill” to be politically correct, nobody is ever offended if you ask where “Daygo Hill” is. That’s where the family eating establishments are. “Daygo Hill”. Gotta love it.



The pejorative is "Dago," not "Daygo." Crikey.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,553
Default Kayla Moore...

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/12/17 1:35 PM, Tim wrote:
Its Me
- show quoted text -
No, not in any sense.

"It is widely recognized that the attributive use of the noun Jew, in
phrases such as Jew lawyer or Jew ethics, is both vulgar and highly
offensive. In such contexts Jewish is the only acceptable possibility.
Some people, however, have become so wary of this construction that they
have extended the stigma to any use of Jew as a noun, a practice that
carries risks of its own. In a sentence such as There are now several
Jews on the council, which is unobjectionable, the substitution of a
circumlocution like Jewish people or persons of Jewish background may in
itself cause offense for seeming to imply that Jew has a negative
connotation when used as a noun."

Some folks just want to be offended, or are looking too hard for offensive things.

——

Though the Italian settlements in St. Louis is now called “The Hill” to
be politically correct, nobody is ever offended if you ask where “Daygo
Hill” is. That’s where the family eating establishments are. “Daygo
Hill”. Gotta love it.



The pejorative is "Dago," not "Daygo." Crikey.


Maybe Tim was trying to be a little PC.

  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default Kayla Moore...

Keyser Soze
- show quoted text -
The pejorative is "Dago," not "Daygo." Crikey.
....

Dago, as in “Dah-goh? “ At least with my spelling you know how to pronounce it.

Crikey
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Michael Moore Alex[_10_] General 70 September 27th 16 09:57 PM
OMG, Moore Right jps General 1 July 12th 09 11:14 PM
Don't go and see Michael Moore!!! Bob Crantz ASA 27 July 13th 04 03:09 AM
If M. Moore is and example of Democrats Joe ASA 39 June 29th 04 11:51 AM
More Awards for Moore Bobsprit ASA 8 June 29th 04 11:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017