wrote:
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 13:16:54 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/26/17 1:15 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 12:48:14 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/26/17 12:36 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 12:10:46 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/26/17 11:57 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 10:43:09 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/26/17 8:32 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 26, 2017 at 5:47:29 AM UTC-6, John H wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...came-from.html

States with the most guns
recovered in Chicago

Illinois 22,051
Indiana 7,747
Mississippi 4,296
Wisconsin 1,647
Kentucky 1,226
Ohio 1,121
Tennessee 1,090
Alabama 1,070
Arkansas 944
Texas 937

Where the hell's Virginia? The map does show a few, mostly from
the Norfolk area, but nothing like
Herr Krause indicates.

Let's see, that's from the NYTimes, one of the Krause favorites,
so can't be biased.

Here's a discussion of the gun control laws in Chicago and just how well it
'controls guns'. Sounds
like Chuck's Gun Shop is the 'real' gunshow loophole!

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/30/us...tal-shots.html

The Virginia trunk dealers are presently out of stock.



Tell us, Mr. Rocket Scientist, why would someone who lives in Illinois
be interested in buying a firearm in Virginia when next-door Indiana has
such lax firearms regulations? Not that Virginia has any sort of serious
firearms regulations. When I sold my SIG to a Virginia resident, I
arranged for the transfer to be done by an FFL there, but I called the
Virginia State Police first and was told they didn't care how I did the
transfer. But both the buyer of my SIG and I wanted to do a "kosher"
transaction, so we split the $20 FFL fee.

You also cleverly ignore the fact that a Chicago (or any out of state)
resident buying a handgun in Indiana is already a violation of federal
law. Both the buyer and the seller could do federal prison time.
Carrying that gun back across state lines is also a federal law
violation along with whatever Illinois and Chicago laws they are
breaking.
Do you really thing that "just one more law" is going to make any
difference at all?
I know you just want to do something so you can say you hope that will
make it better.
Why not just pray? The effect will be the same and it only seems that
way to a true believer.



Ahhh...the Fretwell solution to every serious problem...do nothing and
hope it works.


===

You (of course) missed the important message: new laws are not the
answer.

The answer that works has already been demonstrated in New York City -
tough policing of existing laws; arrest and jail time for low level
offenders; stop and frisk policies; holding precinct commanders
accountable for their crime statistics.

The ensuing drop in crime of all types was unprecedented, and totally
transformed NYC's reputation as an unsafe city.

---

I'm in favor of tough enforcement of all gun and violent crime laws.
We don't have enough jails to lock up many more low level offenders. I
don't favor building any more for-profit private jails. I oppose stop
and frisk policies without a specific reason, and that reason cannot be
that an individual is black, latino, muslim, et cetera.


===

Then stop whining and accept the consequences.



That's absurd. Despite the efforts of Grifter Trump, this isn't Germany
of the 1930s and 1940s.

===

Nice try but Trump has nothing to do with the gun violence in Chicago
or anywhere else.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Whoosh.

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.

On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 14:14:34 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 13:16:54 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

That's absurd. Despite the efforts of Grifter Trump, this isn't Germany
of the 1930s and 1940s.

===

Nice try but Trump has nothing to do with the gun violence in Chicago
or anywhere else.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Whoosh.

Again old "we don't need no stinking facts" Harry avoids the truth and
resorts to a brain fart. His brain has no sphincter so it just a
whoosh.