|
Take the idiot out~
Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442 |
Take the idiot out~
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None! https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442 So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal. |
Take the idiot out~
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None! https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442 So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal. === Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal. |
Take the idiot out~
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None! https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442 So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal. === Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal. Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ. |
Take the idiot out~
John H
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None! https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442 So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal. .... The thing is, you play stupid games like that then you can win stupid prizes. Pretty low judgement concerning conduct imo |
Take the idiot out~
Wayne.B
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H wrote: - show quoted text - === Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal. ..... Yeah, he was probably scorning Wiener, though. |
Take the idiot out~
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None! https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442 So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal. === Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal. Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ. I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton. In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine. There are laws in some states about doing this if you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy. If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than $4k in damages. I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was the Acme of foolishness in the first place. |
Take the idiot out~
- show quoted text - If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than $4k in damages. I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was the Acme of foolishness in the first place. —\0- Yep! |
Take the idiot out~
On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None! https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442 So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal. === Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal. Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ. I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton. In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine. There are laws in some states about doing this if you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy. If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than $4k in damages. I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was the Acme of foolishness in the first place. But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians about sending photos of a penis to women? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:41 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com