Take the idiot out~
 

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442

Take the idiot out~
 

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442

So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442

So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442

So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.

Take the idiot out~
 

John H
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442

So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal.
....
The thing is, you play stupid games like that then you can win stupid prizes.

Pretty low judgement concerning conduct imo

Take the idiot out~
 

Wayne.B
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:
- show quoted text -
===

Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal.
.....
Yeah, he was probably scorning Wiener, though.

Take the idiot out~
 

On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442

So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.



I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton.
In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor
charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine.

There are laws in some states about doing this if
you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442

So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.



I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton.
In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor
charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine.

There are laws in some states about doing this if
you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.



If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more
devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than
$4k in damages.
I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was
the Acme of foolishness in the first place.

Take the idiot out~
 

- show quoted text -
If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more
devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than
$4k in damages.
I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was
the Acme of foolishness in the first place.

—\0-

Yep!

Take the idiot out~
 

On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442

So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.



I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton.
In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor
charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine.

There are laws in some states about doing this if
you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.



If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more
devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than
$4k in damages.
I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was
the Acme of foolishness in the first place.



But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

Take the idiot out~
 

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442

So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.



I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton.
In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor
charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine.

There are laws in some states about doing this if
you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.



If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more
devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than
$4k in damages.
I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was
the Acme of foolishness in the first place.



But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:03:57 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

John H
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442

So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal.
...
The thing is, you play stupid games like that then you can win stupid prizes.

Pretty low judgement concerning conduct imo

I'll go along with stupid!

Take the idiot out~
 

On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442

So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.



I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton.
In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor
charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine.

There are laws in some states about doing this if
you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.



If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more
devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than
$4k in damages.
I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was
the Acme of foolishness in the first place.



But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid.


But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers in
Alabama.

Take the idiot out~
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442

So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly
don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.



I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton.
In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor
charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine.

There are laws in some states about doing this if
you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.



If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more
devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than
$4k in damages.
I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was
the Acme of foolishness in the first place.



But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid.


But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers in
Alabama.


100 years ago, 14 was married age.

Take the idiot out~
 

On 11/23/2017 2:11 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for
this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442


So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly
don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly.Â* Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big
deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These
days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be
copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.



I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton.
In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor
charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine.

There are laws in some states about doing this if
you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.



If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more
devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than
$4k in damages.
I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was
the Acme of foolishness in the first place.



But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid.


But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers in
Alabama.


You leave out one minor fact. Moore has denied it ever happened.
He has never said, nor have any of his supporters said it's "ok".

That's not a personal judgement or conclusion on my part, so relax but
again, it's spreading a dishonest, fake news slant on your part.

Take the idiot out~
 

Keyser Soze
- show quoted text -
But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

....

Harry, are you that overly concerned about penises? You seem to be...

Take the idiot out~
 

On 11/23/17 2:21 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442

So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly
don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.



I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton.
In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor
charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine.

There are laws in some states about doing this if
you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.



If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more
devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than
$4k in damages.
I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was
the Acme of foolishness in the first place.



But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid.


But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers in
Alabama.


100 years ago, 14 was married age.



Oh...so it is 1917 in evangelical Alabama. Well, you may be right about
that.

Take the idiot out~
 

On 11/23/17 3:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/23/2017 2:11 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for
this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442


So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly
don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly.Â* Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big
deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These
days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be
copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.



I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton.
In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor
charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine.

There are laws in some states about doing this if
you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.



If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more
devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than
$4k in damages.
I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was
the Acme of foolishness in the first place.



But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid.


But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers
in Alabama.


You leave out one minor fact.Â* Moore has denied it ever happened.
He has never said, nor have any of his supporters said it's "ok".

That's not a personal judgement or conclusion on my part, so relax but
again, it's spreading a dishonest, fake news slant on your part.


You sound like Trump the Moron, who, BTW, has also been accused of child
molestation.

It is a fact Moore has denied it. But one of his preacher buddies said
there was nothing unusual about a 32-year-old man chasing after young
teenaged girls.

I bet that's ok with you Trump apologists, too. And when you claim you
are not a Trump apologist, you sound like Moore.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:11:17 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wr
But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid.


But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers in
Alabama.

I didn't hear anyone say that either but when you make **** up I guess
you can say anything.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:11:17 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wr
But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid.


But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers in
Alabama.

I didn't hear anyone say that either but when you make **** up I guess
you can say anything.
.....

Yknow he seems to do that on a regular basis...

Take the idiot out~
 

On 11/23/2017 3:39 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 3:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/23/2017 2:11 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for
this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442


So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I
honestly don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly.Â* Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a
big deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over.
These days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be
copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.



I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton.
In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor
charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine.

There are laws in some states about doing this if
you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.



If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more
devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than
$4k in damages.
I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was
the Acme of foolishness in the first place.



But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid.


But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers
in Alabama.


You leave out one minor fact.Â* Moore has denied it ever happened.
He has never said, nor have any of his supporters said it's "ok".

That's not a personal judgement or conclusion on my part, so relax but
again, it's spreading a dishonest, fake news slant on your part.


You sound like Trump the Moron, who, BTW, has also been accused of child
molestation.

It is a fact Moore has denied it. But one of his preacher buddies said
there was nothing unusual about a 32-year-old man chasing after young
teenaged girls.

I bet that's ok with you Trump apologists, too. And when you claim you
are not a Trump apologist, you sound like Moore.




You sound like one f'd up ass. But you knew that.

Take the idiot out~
 

4:50 PMMr. Luddite
- show quoted text -
You sound like one f'd up ass. But you knew that.

—\0
He evidently doesn’t care, but it does get him the attention he craves...

Take the idiot out~
 

On 11/23/17 5:50 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/23/2017 3:39 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 3:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/23/2017 2:11 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for
this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442


So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I
honestly don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly.Â* Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a
big deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over.
These days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be
copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.



I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton.
In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a
misdemeanor
charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine.

There are laws in some states about doing this if
you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.



If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be
more
devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than
$4k in damages.
I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was
the Acme of foolishness in the first place.



But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid.


But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers
in Alabama.


You leave out one minor fact.Â* Moore has denied it ever happened.
He has never said, nor have any of his supporters said it's "ok".

That's not a personal judgement or conclusion on my part, so relax
but again, it's spreading a dishonest, fake news slant on your part.


You sound like Trump the Moron, who, BTW, has also been accused of
child molestation.

It is a fact Moore has denied it. But one of his preacher buddies said
there was nothing unusual about a 32-year-old man chasing after young
teenaged girls.

I bet that's ok with you Trump apologists, too. And when you claim you
are not a Trump apologist, you sound like Moore.




You sound like one f'd up ass.Â* But you knew that.




Sorry, but Trump's deeds, words, threats, endorsements, associations, et
cetera, have convinced me he is a horrible human being and an even worse
president. The sooner he is gone or so tied up as to be able to do a lot
less damage, the better.

Take the idiot out~
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 2:21 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442

So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly
don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.



I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton.
In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor
charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine.

There are laws in some states about doing this if
you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.



If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more
devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than
$4k in damages.
I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was
the Acme of foolishness in the first place.



But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid.


But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers in
Alabama.


100 years ago, 14 was married age.



Oh...so it is 1917 in evangelical Alabama. Well, you may be right about
that.


Even younger in Maryland. Now! Look at all those unwed mommies that are
barely teenage, or younger. That is now, the present time.

Take the idiot out~
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 5:50 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/23/2017 3:39 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 3:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/23/2017 2:11 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for
this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442



So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I
honestly don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly.Â* Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a
big deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over.
These days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be
copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.



I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton.
In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a
misdemeanor
charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine.

There are laws in some states about doing this if
you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.



If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be
more
devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than
$4k in damages.
I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was
the Acme of foolishness in the first place.



But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid.


But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers
in Alabama.


You leave out one minor fact.Â* Moore has denied it ever happened.
He has never said, nor have any of his supporters said it's "ok".

That's not a personal judgement or conclusion on my part, so relax
but again, it's spreading a dishonest, fake news slant on your part.


You sound like Trump the Moron, who, BTW, has also been accused of
child molestation.

It is a fact Moore has denied it. But one of his preacher buddies said
there was nothing unusual about a 32-year-old man chasing after young
teenaged girls.

I bet that's ok with you Trump apologists, too. And when you claim you
are not a Trump apologist, you sound like Moore.




You sound like one f'd up ass.Â* But you knew that.




Sorry, but Trump's deeds, words, threats, endorsements, associations, et
cetera, have convinced me he is a horrible human being and an even worse
president. The sooner he is gone or so tied up as to be able to do a lot
less damage, the better.


So you want a personable President, who gives away $10 trillion of our kids
money, or a personable President, who has to pay $850,000to,a,lady he
sexually harassed? How much better off was the middle and lower class
after the past 16 years of leadership before Trump?

Take the idiot out~
 

On 11/23/17 10:24 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 5:50 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/23/2017 3:39 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 3:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/23/2017 2:11 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for
this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442



So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I
honestly don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly.Â* Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a
big deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over.
These days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be
copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.



I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton.
In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a
misdemeanor
charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine.

There are laws in some states about doing this if
you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.



If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be
more
devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than
$4k in damages.
I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was
the Acme of foolishness in the first place.



But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid.


But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers
in Alabama.


You leave out one minor fact.Â* Moore has denied it ever happened.
He has never said, nor have any of his supporters said it's "ok".

That's not a personal judgement or conclusion on my part, so relax
but again, it's spreading a dishonest, fake news slant on your part.


You sound like Trump the Moron, who, BTW, has also been accused of
child molestation.

It is a fact Moore has denied it. But one of his preacher buddies said
there was nothing unusual about a 32-year-old man chasing after young
teenaged girls.

I bet that's ok with you Trump apologists, too. And when you claim you
are not a Trump apologist, you sound like Moore.




You sound like one f'd up ass.Â* But you knew that.




Sorry, but Trump's deeds, words, threats, endorsements, associations, et
cetera, have convinced me he is a horrible human being and an even worse
president. The sooner he is gone or so tied up as to be able to do a lot
less damage, the better.


So you want a personable President, who gives away $10 trillion of our kids
money, or a personable President, who has to pay $850,000to,a,lady he
sexually harassed? How much better off was the middle and lower class
after the past 16 years of leadership before Trump?



I appreciate that guys like you appreciate ignorant, incompetent,
racist, sexist, pedophiles for POTUS. I don't.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:32:20 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:


I appreciate that guys like you appreciate ignorant, incompetent,
racist, sexist, pedophiles for POTUS. I don't.

We lived through Bill Clinton and the murdering, raping Kennedys.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:12:40 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:32:20 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:


I appreciate that guys like you appreciate ignorant, incompetent,
racist, sexist, pedophiles for POTUS. I don't.

We lived through Bill Clinton and the murdering, raping Kennedys.

===

Not to mention LBJ who ramped up the Vietnam war under false pretenses
and started us down the road to a welfare state.

Take the idiot out~
 

On 11/24/17 11:12 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:32:20 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:


I appreciate that guys like you appreciate ignorant, incompetent,
racist, sexist, pedophiles for POTUS. I don't.

We lived through Bill Clinton and the murdering, raping Kennedys.


Neither Clinton nor Jack, Bobby, or Teddy Kennedy were ignorant,
incompetent, racist, sexist pedophiles.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:33:07 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:12:40 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:32:20 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:


I appreciate that guys like you appreciate ignorant, incompetent,
racist, sexist, pedophiles for POTUS. I don't.

We lived through Bill Clinton and the murdering, raping Kennedys.

===

Not to mention LBJ who ramped up the Vietnam war under false pretenses
and started us down the road to a welfare state.

They have a hard time with LBJ. He gets presented as a liberal hero
but the tapes show that he was really pretty racist in private and his
war killed a disproportionate number of black kids.
It was actually FDR that started us down the road to a welfare state
but LBJ made that an expressway. FDR gets credited with creating
Social Security and LBJ brought us Medicare but they also doomed them
to failure by FDR starting the tradition of spending the surplus to
hide the cost of his war and LBJ rolling the whole thing into the
general fund to hide the cost of his war. Now they are simply unfunded
welfare programs.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:56:06 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/24/17 11:12 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:32:20 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:


I appreciate that guys like you appreciate ignorant, incompetent,
racist, sexist, pedophiles for POTUS. I don't.

We lived through Bill Clinton and the murdering, raping Kennedys.


Neither Clinton nor Jack, Bobby, or Teddy Kennedy were ignorant,
incompetent, racist, sexist pedophiles.

Jack and Bobby were arrogant, incompetent war mongers who damned near
caused WWIII over bull**** and Teddy murdered a girl, was implicated
in a rape and lied about it.
They also had a total disregard of the constitution with their various
crusades. JFK should have been impeached and Bobby should have gone to
jail, taking J.E. Hoover with him.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 12:42:50 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:33:07 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:12:40 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:32:20 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:


I appreciate that guys like you appreciate ignorant, incompetent,
racist, sexist, pedophiles for POTUS. I don't.

We lived through Bill Clinton and the murdering, raping Kennedys.

===

Not to mention LBJ who ramped up the Vietnam war under false pretenses
and started us down the road to a welfare state.

They have a hard time with LBJ. He gets presented as a liberal hero
but the tapes show that he was really pretty racist in private and his
war killed a disproportionate number of black kids.
It was actually FDR that started us down the road to a welfare state
but LBJ made that an expressway. FDR gets credited with creating
Social Security and LBJ brought us Medicare but they also doomed them
to failure by FDR starting the tradition of spending the surplus to
hide the cost of his war and LBJ rolling the whole thing into the
general fund to hide the cost of his war. Now they are simply unfunded
welfare programs.

===

At least in theory, Social Security was supposed to be an insurance
and retirement savings program. That's not welfare in my book but
obviously it has morphed over time.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 12:47:53 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:56:06 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/24/17 11:12 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:32:20 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:


I appreciate that guys like you appreciate ignorant, incompetent,
racist, sexist, pedophiles for POTUS. I don't.

We lived through Bill Clinton and the murdering, raping Kennedys.


Neither Clinton nor Jack, Bobby, or Teddy Kennedy were ignorant,
incompetent, racist, sexist pedophiles.

Jack and Bobby were arrogant, incompetent war mongers who damned near
caused WWIII over bull**** and Teddy murdered a girl, was implicated
in a rape and lied about it.
They also had a total disregard of the constitution with their various
crusades. JFK should have been impeached and Bobby should have gone to
jail, taking J.E. Hoover with him.

===

I think murder is too strong a word for Teddy's transgression. You or
I in the same circumstances would probably have been charged with
felony Vehicular Manslaughter.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 13:16:01 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 12:42:50 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:33:07 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:12:40 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:32:20 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:


I appreciate that guys like you appreciate ignorant, incompetent,
racist, sexist, pedophiles for POTUS. I don't.

We lived through Bill Clinton and the murdering, raping Kennedys.

===

Not to mention LBJ who ramped up the Vietnam war under false pretenses
and started us down the road to a welfare state.

They have a hard time with LBJ. He gets presented as a liberal hero
but the tapes show that he was really pretty racist in private and his
war killed a disproportionate number of black kids.
It was actually FDR that started us down the road to a welfare state
but LBJ made that an expressway. FDR gets credited with creating
Social Security and LBJ brought us Medicare but they also doomed them
to failure by FDR starting the tradition of spending the surplus to
hide the cost of his war and LBJ rolling the whole thing into the
general fund to hide the cost of his war. Now they are simply unfunded
welfare programs.

===

At least in theory, Social Security was supposed to be an insurance
and retirement savings program. That's not welfare in my book but
obviously it has morphed over time.

There was no actual investment component so it was really a Ponzi. As
long as intake exceeded outflow, it was great, but so was Bernie
Madoff's scam.
In FDR's time, the demographics worked, In LBJs time, not so much.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 13:24:27 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 12:47:53 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:56:06 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/24/17 11:12 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:32:20 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:


I appreciate that guys like you appreciate ignorant, incompetent,
racist, sexist, pedophiles for POTUS. I don't.

We lived through Bill Clinton and the murdering, raping Kennedys.


Neither Clinton nor Jack, Bobby, or Teddy Kennedy were ignorant,
incompetent, racist, sexist pedophiles.

Jack and Bobby were arrogant, incompetent war mongers who damned near
caused WWIII over bull**** and Teddy murdered a girl, was implicated
in a rape and lied about it.
They also had a total disregard of the constitution with their various
crusades. JFK should have been impeached and Bobby should have gone to
jail, taking J.E. Hoover with him.

===

I think murder is too strong a word for Teddy's transgression. You or
I in the same circumstances would probably have been charged with
felony Vehicular Manslaughter.

Felony DUI manslaughter can get you 20+ years (about the same as 2d
degree murder).
Teddy just got reelected for 40 more years.
That was just one dead girl. JFK/RFK's arrogance was far more
dangerous for the whole world. They risked nuclear war to get the
missiles out of Cuba and in the end they got the same deal Krushchev
wanted without all of the drama. (we took our missiles out of Turkey,
the Soviets took their missiles out of Cuba).

Take the idiot out~
 

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 14:47:40 -0500, wrote:

Jack and Bobby were arrogant, incompetent war mongers who damned near
caused WWIII over bull**** and Teddy murdered a girl, was implicated
in a rape and lied about it.
They also had a total disregard of the constitution with their various
crusades. JFK should have been impeached and Bobby should have gone to
jail, taking J.E. Hoover with him.

===

I think murder is too strong a word for Teddy's transgression. You or
I in the same circumstances would probably have been charged with
felony Vehicular Manslaughter.

Felony DUI manslaughter can get you 20+ years (about the same as 2d
degree murder).

===

The primary difference is intent.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:26:06 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 14:47:40 -0500, wrote:

Jack and Bobby were arrogant, incompetent war mongers who damned near
caused WWIII over bull**** and Teddy murdered a girl, was implicated
in a rape and lied about it.
They also had a total disregard of the constitution with their various
crusades. JFK should have been impeached and Bobby should have gone to
jail, taking J.E. Hoover with him.

===

I think murder is too strong a word for Teddy's transgression. You or
I in the same circumstances would probably have been charged with
felony Vehicular Manslaughter.

Felony DUI manslaughter can get you 20+ years (about the same as 2d
degree murder).

===

The primary difference is intent.

"Depraved Indifference" = 2d degree murder
To be drunk and driving around is bad enough but to go off and leave a
girl drowning in a car and not even call anyone until the next day is
depraved indifference to human life.
I suppose if I was a conspiracy guy like Harry, I might even say there
is a chance she was dead when he pushed the car off the bridge. Dead
girls tell no tales.

Take the idiot out~
 

On 11/24/17 2:32 PM, wrote:
On 24 Nov 2017 18:05:13 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:56:06 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/24/17 11:12 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:32:20 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:


I appreciate that guys like you appreciate ignorant, incompetent,
racist, sexist, pedophiles for POTUS. I don't.

We lived through Bill Clinton and the murdering, raping Kennedys.


Neither Clinton nor Jack, Bobby, or Teddy Kennedy were ignorant,
incompetent, racist, sexist pedophiles.

Jack and Bobby were arrogant, incompetent war mongers who damned near
caused WWIII over bull**** and Teddy murdered a girl, was implicated
in a rape and lied about it.
They also had a total disregard of the constitution with their various
crusades. JFK should have been impeached and Bobby should have gone to
jail, taking J.E. Hoover with him.


Heheheheh. You are a trip.

Again, what part is not true?


For a myriad of reasons, I just don't buy into your view of the world,
your right-wing politics, your uninformed opinions on psychology and
sociology, et cetera. I'm not your mindless buddy, John Herring.
Further, you sort of put the cover on that pot when you posited several
times here that the black slaves would have been better off without
being emancipated for a few more generations. Unlike you, I don't expect
historical figures to be perfect in every way or to meet some set of
standards that you find acceptable.

Hell, man, you provide cover to Donald Trump, unquestionably the worst
POTUS in the history of the nation, and we've had some serious losers.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:34:17 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:26:06 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 14:47:40 -0500, wrote:

Jack and Bobby were arrogant, incompetent war mongers who damned near
caused WWIII over bull**** and Teddy murdered a girl, was implicated
in a rape and lied about it.
They also had a total disregard of the constitution with their various
crusades. JFK should have been impeached and Bobby should have gone to
jail, taking J.E. Hoover with him.

===

I think murder is too strong a word for Teddy's transgression. You or
I in the same circumstances would probably have been charged with
felony Vehicular Manslaughter.

Felony DUI manslaughter can get you 20+ years (about the same as 2d
degree murder).

===

The primary difference is intent.

"Depraved Indifference" = 2d degree murder
To be drunk and driving around is bad enough but to go off and leave a
girl drowning in a car and not even call anyone until the next day is
depraved indifference to human life.
I suppose if I was a conspiracy guy like Harry, I might even say there
is a chance she was dead when he pushed the car off the bridge. Dead
girls tell no tales.

===

I very much doubt that it was intentional but I do think he likely
would have been indicted for something in any other state.

Take the idiot out~
 

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:13:31 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Keyser Soze
- show quoted text -
But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

...

Harry, are you that overly concerned about penises? You seem to be...

He's the only one I know who is in a 'penis' group. Of course, he lied about how he got there.