|
Take the idiot out~
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:03:57 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
John H On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None! https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442 So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal. ... The thing is, you play stupid games like that then you can win stupid prizes. Pretty low judgement concerning conduct imo I'll go along with stupid! |
Take the idiot out~
On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None! https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442 So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal. === Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal. Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ. I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton. In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine. There are laws in some states about doing this if you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy. If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than $4k in damages. I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was the Acme of foolishness in the first place. But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians about sending photos of a penis to women? All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid. But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers in Alabama. |
Take the idiot out~
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None! https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442 So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal. === Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal. Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ. I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton. In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine. There are laws in some states about doing this if you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy. If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than $4k in damages. I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was the Acme of foolishness in the first place. But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians about sending photos of a penis to women? All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid. But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers in Alabama. 100 years ago, 14 was married age. |
Take the idiot out~
On 11/23/2017 2:11 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None! https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442 So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal. === Exactly.Â* Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal. Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ. I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton. In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine. There are laws in some states about doing this if you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy. If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than $4k in damages. I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was the Acme of foolishness in the first place. But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians about sending photos of a penis to women? All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid. But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers in Alabama. You leave out one minor fact. Moore has denied it ever happened. He has never said, nor have any of his supporters said it's "ok". That's not a personal judgement or conclusion on my part, so relax but again, it's spreading a dishonest, fake news slant on your part. |
Take the idiot out~
Keyser Soze
- show quoted text - But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians about sending photos of a penis to women? .... Harry, are you that overly concerned about penises? You seem to be... |
Take the idiot out~
On 11/23/17 2:21 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None! https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442 So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal. === Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal. Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ. I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton. In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine. There are laws in some states about doing this if you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy. If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than $4k in damages. I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was the Acme of foolishness in the first place. But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians about sending photos of a penis to women? All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid. But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers in Alabama. 100 years ago, 14 was married age. Oh...so it is 1917 in evangelical Alabama. Well, you may be right about that. |
Take the idiot out~
On 11/23/17 3:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/23/2017 2:11 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None! https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442 So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly don't see it as a big deal. === Exactly.Â* Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal. Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ. I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton. In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine. There are laws in some states about doing this if you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy. If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than $4k in damages. I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was the Acme of foolishness in the first place. But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians about sending photos of a penis to women? All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid. But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers in Alabama. You leave out one minor fact.Â* Moore has denied it ever happened. He has never said, nor have any of his supporters said it's "ok". That's not a personal judgement or conclusion on my part, so relax but again, it's spreading a dishonest, fake news slant on your part. You sound like Trump the Moron, who, BTW, has also been accused of child molestation. It is a fact Moore has denied it. But one of his preacher buddies said there was nothing unusual about a 32-year-old man chasing after young teenaged girls. I bet that's ok with you Trump apologists, too. And when you claim you are not a Trump apologist, you sound like Moore. |
Take the idiot out~
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:11:17 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze wr But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians about sending photos of a penis to women? All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid. But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers in Alabama. I didn't hear anyone say that either but when you make **** up I guess you can say anything. |
Take the idiot out~
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:11:17 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze wr But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians about sending photos of a penis to women? All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid. But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers in Alabama. I didn't hear anyone say that either but when you make **** up I guess you can say anything. ..... Yknow he seems to do that on a regular basis... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com