Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Its Me wrote:
On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 2:09:33 PM UTC-4, Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/5/17 12:28 PM, wrote: On Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:27:45 -0400, John H wrote: A great article from the Chicago Tribune: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/c...004-story.html "The dead weren’t even finished dying in Las Vegas before the left swooped down to feed on gun control politics." I see that they are going after the "hearing protection act" too, in spite of the fact that the people in Vegas did not recognize the gun shots until they started seeing people getting shot. It is the only time in history that I can remember people wanting to keep ear damaging equipment as loud as they can. That is certainly not true of cars, motor cycles, leaf blowers or lawn mowers. They are now trying to ban loud generators in some places. Since a suppressed center fire rifle is still 130 dB or higher these people who think it is "silent" should shut the **** up about 90 dB leaf blowers. What a wonderful name..."the hearing protection act." I don't see any problems with the current regs regarding suppressors. I got one without any fuss or muss...I bought the device, the dealer stuck it in his safe, we filed the paperwork and paid for the stamp, and I got approved. Yawn. No fuss? Create a trust, lots of paperwork. Sounds like a lot of fuss and unnecessary expense. The trust and stamp adds $300 to the cost of the suppressor, and there's a wait of about 4 months to get approved. And now you have to be fingerprinted to be in the trust for new purchases. It's a PITA. And Harry thinks this is fuss less? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Who's left? | General | |||
Wow, 39 left of 91... | General | |||
Not much left... | General | |||
Not for the left | General | |||
Left Behind | General |