On 6/19/2017 5:46 PM, justan wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message:
On 6/19/2017 9:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/19/17 9:20 AM, Tim wrote:
FWIW, I picked this up from a French gentleman in FB.

"In France whe have more informations ...
It's a japanese container carrier boat but With a Philippine flag and
crew.
And this boat at the Last moment abruptly changed his direction ...
Investigation is underway With this crew..."


NPR has a pretty decent early analysis of what might have gone
wrong...it includes this about a previous incident on a similar
high-tech ship:

Sailors in the Fitzgerald's combat information center and on its bridge
are responsible for using the ship's sensors to plot the location of
each one, as well as the directions they're headed and the speed at
which they're sailing. Officers and sailors must at all times keep what
the Navy calls good "situational awareness" about not only what their
own ship is doing, but about what might be ahead in the next patch of
ocean where the Fitzgerald wants to sail.

In 2012 a sibling of the Fitzgerald, the destroyer USS Porter, was in a
congested, high-traffic seaway called the Strait of Hormuz ? the ribbon
of water that connects the Persian Gulf with the Arabian Sea ? when it
collided with an oil tanker. The Navy's investigation later found that
as sailors tried to keep track of the traffic all around them, including
those ships headed the other direction, they lost focus on their own
immediate course ahead.


Ergo, the high technology doesn't always promote good seamanship.
Training as careful sailors may be more important than training as
operators of computer consoles.


It will probably please you to know that Navy ships do not rely only on
computer consoles for situational awareness. Ask any sailor who has
stood watches while underway.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Harry couldn't possibly have situational awareness of any military
situations.


Not when he equates union ship operators to the US Navy. LOL!