Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Amazing reaction to tax announcement
On 4/26/2017 7:35 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/26/17 6:10 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 6:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 5:17 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 5:11 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:39:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 4:15 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 4:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 3:07 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 2:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: As is my hobby, I channel surf after a major political announcement or news, just to get a feel on how the cable networks react. So, after today's announcement of the proposed new tax rates, the panel on FoxNews were kicking around how it will help individuals, small businesses and large businesses. The focus of their discussion was how and why the new tax rate plan would benefit the economy overall and create more jobs. Switch to MSNBC: Here the larger panel of pundits were focusing (and speculating) on how the new tax rates will benefit Donald Trump. Period. That's all they were talking about. Like you, Fox has bought into the Trump bull****. MSNBC wants to know how many millions the Trumpsters will make off of this, what it will do to the deficits, and how it will devastate what little remains of the social safety net, science, enforcement of anti-pollution and other citizen safety laws. BTW, this wasn't his budget request. It was his proposal for lowering taxes. The rich still pay the highest percentage by far. It really applies to middle class individuals, Sub-S sorporations and large corporations as an incentive to base operations in the USA, expand and hire more Americans. A one time tax will apply for those corporations with their holdings overseas and then a 15 percent (as proposed) tax thereafter. This is very good for the economy of the USA. Really? What about the deficit? His Treasury guy (forget his name) claims the new tax rates will produce something like 5 Trillion in revenues over 5 years. It's a start. That's hilarious. Why's that? I can understand why it could. A robust, growing economy is the largest revenue generating source. Taxes aren't even close. Trump's tax cuts will simply put more money in the hands of the rich, weaken the country and further devastate the lower and middle income families. All that will trickle down is ****. You best cover your head, Krause! Harry's claims are pure BS. His claim that the House and Senate investigations into Russiagate is being drawn out because the Republicans chair the committees is pure BS as well. The Democrats would be screaming bloody murder, especially those on the respective committees. None are complaining, probably because they have yet to find anything to complain about or report. The slowdown has been in the news for several days. Not making headlines that are noticeable. It's probably because the liberal mantra change from "Russia, Russia, Russia" to "Returns, Returns, Returns" is still in process. :Uh huh. Senate Trump-Russia Probe Has No Full-Time Staff, No Key Witnesses The Senate Intelligence Committee’s probe into Russia’s election interference is supposedly the best hope for getting the public credible answers about whether there was any coordination between the Kremlin and Trump Tower. But there are serious reasons to doubt that it can accomplish this task, as currently configured. More than three months after the committee announced that it had agreed on the scope of the investigation, the panel has not begun substantially investigating possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, three individuals with ties to the committee told The Daily Beast. The investigation does not have a single staffer dedicated to it full-time, and those staff members working on it part-time do not have significant investigative experience. The probe currently appears to be moving at a pace slower than prior Senate Intelligence Committee investigations, such as the CIA torture inquiry, which took years to accomplish. No interviews have been conducted with key individuals suspected of being in the Trump-Russia orbit: not Michael Flynn, not Roger Stone, not Carter Page, not Paul Manafort, and not Jared Kushner, according to two sources familiar with the committee’s procedures. http://tinyurl.com/mcvbp6k Excuses, excuses. How about the FBI investigation? Is Comely dragging his feet as well? Hey, did you hear the latest? Rep. Jason Chaffetz announced he will not seek reelection in 2018 in order to spend more time with his family. Your hero, Maxine Waters went on the networks speculating that the real reason is because he's a Russian operative taking orders from the Kremlin and thinks he is about to be exposed. |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Amazing reaction to tax announcement
On 4/27/17 7:43 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/26/2017 7:35 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 6:10 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 6:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 5:17 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 5:11 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:39:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 4:15 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 4:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 3:07 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 2:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: As is my hobby, I channel surf after a major political announcement or news, just to get a feel on how the cable networks react. So, after today's announcement of the proposed new tax rates, the panel on FoxNews were kicking around how it will help individuals, small businesses and large businesses. The focus of their discussion was how and why the new tax rate plan would benefit the economy overall and create more jobs. Switch to MSNBC: Here the larger panel of pundits were focusing (and speculating) on how the new tax rates will benefit Donald Trump. Period. That's all they were talking about. Like you, Fox has bought into the Trump bull****. MSNBC wants to know how many millions the Trumpsters will make off of this, what it will do to the deficits, and how it will devastate what little remains of the social safety net, science, enforcement of anti-pollution and other citizen safety laws. BTW, this wasn't his budget request. It was his proposal for lowering taxes. The rich still pay the highest percentage by far. It really applies to middle class individuals, Sub-S sorporations and large corporations as an incentive to base operations in the USA, expand and hire more Americans. A one time tax will apply for those corporations with their holdings overseas and then a 15 percent (as proposed) tax thereafter. This is very good for the economy of the USA. Really? What about the deficit? His Treasury guy (forget his name) claims the new tax rates will produce something like 5 Trillion in revenues over 5 years. It's a start. That's hilarious. Why's that? I can understand why it could. A robust, growing economy is the largest revenue generating source. Taxes aren't even close. Trump's tax cuts will simply put more money in the hands of the rich, weaken the country and further devastate the lower and middle income families. All that will trickle down is ****. You best cover your head, Krause! Harry's claims are pure BS. His claim that the House and Senate investigations into Russiagate is being drawn out because the Republicans chair the committees is pure BS as well. The Democrats would be screaming bloody murder, especially those on the respective committees. None are complaining, probably because they have yet to find anything to complain about or report. The slowdown has been in the news for several days. Not making headlines that are noticeable. It's probably because the liberal mantra change from "Russia, Russia, Russia" to "Returns, Returns, Returns" is still in process. :Uh huh. Senate Trump-Russia Probe Has No Full-Time Staff, No Key Witnesses The Senate Intelligence Committee’s probe into Russia’s election interference is supposedly the best hope for getting the public credible answers about whether there was any coordination between the Kremlin and Trump Tower. But there are serious reasons to doubt that it can accomplish this task, as currently configured. More than three months after the committee announced that it had agreed on the scope of the investigation, the panel has not begun substantially investigating possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, three individuals with ties to the committee told The Daily Beast. The investigation does not have a single staffer dedicated to it full-time, and those staff members working on it part-time do not have significant investigative experience. The probe currently appears to be moving at a pace slower than prior Senate Intelligence Committee investigations, such as the CIA torture inquiry, which took years to accomplish. No interviews have been conducted with key individuals suspected of being in the Trump-Russia orbit: not Michael Flynn, not Roger Stone, not Carter Page, not Paul Manafort, and not Jared Kushner, according to two sources familiar with the committee’s procedures. http://tinyurl.com/mcvbp6k Excuses, excuses. How about the FBI investigation? Is Comely dragging his feet as well? Hey, did you hear the latest? Rep. Jason Chaffetz announced he will not seek reelection in 2018 in order to spend more time with his family. Your hero, Maxine Waters went on the networks speculating that the real reason is because he's a Russian operative taking orders from the Kremlin and thinks he is about to be exposed. I doubt that is the reason Chaffetz is leaving. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Amazing reaction to tax announcement
On 4/27/2017 7:51 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/27/17 7:43 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 7:35 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 6:10 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 6:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 5:17 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 5:11 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:39:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 4:15 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 4:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 3:07 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 2:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: As is my hobby, I channel surf after a major political announcement or news, just to get a feel on how the cable networks react. So, after today's announcement of the proposed new tax rates, the panel on FoxNews were kicking around how it will help individuals, small businesses and large businesses. The focus of their discussion was how and why the new tax rate plan would benefit the economy overall and create more jobs. Switch to MSNBC: Here the larger panel of pundits were focusing (and speculating) on how the new tax rates will benefit Donald Trump. Period. That's all they were talking about. Like you, Fox has bought into the Trump bull****. MSNBC wants to know how many millions the Trumpsters will make off of this, what it will do to the deficits, and how it will devastate what little remains of the social safety net, science, enforcement of anti-pollution and other citizen safety laws. BTW, this wasn't his budget request. It was his proposal for lowering taxes. The rich still pay the highest percentage by far. It really applies to middle class individuals, Sub-S sorporations and large corporations as an incentive to base operations in the USA, expand and hire more Americans. A one time tax will apply for those corporations with their holdings overseas and then a 15 percent (as proposed) tax thereafter. This is very good for the economy of the USA. Really? What about the deficit? His Treasury guy (forget his name) claims the new tax rates will produce something like 5 Trillion in revenues over 5 years. It's a start. That's hilarious. Why's that? I can understand why it could. A robust, growing economy is the largest revenue generating source. Taxes aren't even close. Trump's tax cuts will simply put more money in the hands of the rich, weaken the country and further devastate the lower and middle income families. All that will trickle down is ****. You best cover your head, Krause! Harry's claims are pure BS. His claim that the House and Senate investigations into Russiagate is being drawn out because the Republicans chair the committees is pure BS as well. The Democrats would be screaming bloody murder, especially those on the respective committees. None are complaining, probably because they have yet to find anything to complain about or report. The slowdown has been in the news for several days. Not making headlines that are noticeable. It's probably because the liberal mantra change from "Russia, Russia, Russia" to "Returns, Returns, Returns" is still in process. :Uh huh. Senate Trump-Russia Probe Has No Full-Time Staff, No Key Witnesses The Senate Intelligence Committee’s probe into Russia’s election interference is supposedly the best hope for getting the public credible answers about whether there was any coordination between the Kremlin and Trump Tower. But there are serious reasons to doubt that it can accomplish this task, as currently configured. More than three months after the committee announced that it had agreed on the scope of the investigation, the panel has not begun substantially investigating possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, three individuals with ties to the committee told The Daily Beast. The investigation does not have a single staffer dedicated to it full-time, and those staff members working on it part-time do not have significant investigative experience. The probe currently appears to be moving at a pace slower than prior Senate Intelligence Committee investigations, such as the CIA torture inquiry, which took years to accomplish. No interviews have been conducted with key individuals suspected of being in the Trump-Russia orbit: not Michael Flynn, not Roger Stone, not Carter Page, not Paul Manafort, and not Jared Kushner, according to two sources familiar with the committee’s procedures. http://tinyurl.com/mcvbp6k Excuses, excuses. How about the FBI investigation? Is Comely dragging his feet as well? Hey, did you hear the latest? Rep. Jason Chaffetz announced he will not seek reelection in 2018 in order to spend more time with his family. Your hero, Maxine Waters went on the networks speculating that the real reason is because he's a Russian operative taking orders from the Kremlin and thinks he is about to be exposed. I doubt that is the reason Chaffetz is leaving. Which reason, Chaffetz's or Maxine's? |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Amazing reaction to tax announcement
On 4/27/17 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/27/2017 7:51 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/27/17 7:43 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 7:35 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 6:10 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 6:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 5:17 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 5:11 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:39:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 4:15 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 4:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 3:07 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 2:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: As is my hobby, I channel surf after a major political announcement or news, just to get a feel on how the cable networks react. So, after today's announcement of the proposed new tax rates, the panel on FoxNews were kicking around how it will help individuals, small businesses and large businesses. The focus of their discussion was how and why the new tax rate plan would benefit the economy overall and create more jobs. Switch to MSNBC: Here the larger panel of pundits were focusing (and speculating) on how the new tax rates will benefit Donald Trump. Period. That's all they were talking about. Like you, Fox has bought into the Trump bull****. MSNBC wants to know how many millions the Trumpsters will make off of this, what it will do to the deficits, and how it will devastate what little remains of the social safety net, science, enforcement of anti-pollution and other citizen safety laws. BTW, this wasn't his budget request. It was his proposal for lowering taxes. The rich still pay the highest percentage by far. It really applies to middle class individuals, Sub-S sorporations and large corporations as an incentive to base operations in the USA, expand and hire more Americans. A one time tax will apply for those corporations with their holdings overseas and then a 15 percent (as proposed) tax thereafter. This is very good for the economy of the USA. Really? What about the deficit? His Treasury guy (forget his name) claims the new tax rates will produce something like 5 Trillion in revenues over 5 years. It's a start. That's hilarious. Why's that? I can understand why it could. A robust, growing economy is the largest revenue generating source. Taxes aren't even close. Trump's tax cuts will simply put more money in the hands of the rich, weaken the country and further devastate the lower and middle income families. All that will trickle down is ****. You best cover your head, Krause! Harry's claims are pure BS. His claim that the House and Senate investigations into Russiagate is being drawn out because the Republicans chair the committees is pure BS as well. The Democrats would be screaming bloody murder, especially those on the respective committees. None are complaining, probably because they have yet to find anything to complain about or report. The slowdown has been in the news for several days. Not making headlines that are noticeable. It's probably because the liberal mantra change from "Russia, Russia, Russia" to "Returns, Returns, Returns" is still in process. :Uh huh. Senate Trump-Russia Probe Has No Full-Time Staff, No Key Witnesses The Senate Intelligence Committee’s probe into Russia’s election interference is supposedly the best hope for getting the public credible answers about whether there was any coordination between the Kremlin and Trump Tower. But there are serious reasons to doubt that it can accomplish this task, as currently configured. More than three months after the committee announced that it had agreed on the scope of the investigation, the panel has not begun substantially investigating possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, three individuals with ties to the committee told The Daily Beast. The investigation does not have a single staffer dedicated to it full-time, and those staff members working on it part-time do not have significant investigative experience. The probe currently appears to be moving at a pace slower than prior Senate Intelligence Committee investigations, such as the CIA torture inquiry, which took years to accomplish. No interviews have been conducted with key individuals suspected of being in the Trump-Russia orbit: not Michael Flynn, not Roger Stone, not Carter Page, not Paul Manafort, and not Jared Kushner, according to two sources familiar with the committee’s procedures. http://tinyurl.com/mcvbp6k Excuses, excuses. How about the FBI investigation? Is Comely dragging his feet as well? Hey, did you hear the latest? Rep. Jason Chaffetz announced he will not seek reelection in 2018 in order to spend more time with his family. Your hero, Maxine Waters went on the networks speculating that the real reason is because he's a Russian operative taking orders from the Kremlin and thinks he is about to be exposed. I doubt that is the reason Chaffetz is leaving. Which reason, Chaffetz's or Maxine's? The rumor, unsubstantiated, is that Congressman Jason is about to be "outed" as dirty in some way, possibly relating to bribes or some other sort of graft. Or perhaps he wants to run for Senator. We'll know when we know. As for Ms. Waters, I enjoy her outbursts...colorful and colorful language. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Amazing reaction to tax announcement
On 4/27/2017 7:57 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/27/17 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/27/2017 7:51 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/27/17 7:43 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 7:35 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 6:10 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 6:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 5:17 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 5:11 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:39:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 4:15 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 4:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 3:07 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 2:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: As is my hobby, I channel surf after a major political announcement or news, just to get a feel on how the cable networks react. So, after today's announcement of the proposed new tax rates, the panel on FoxNews were kicking around how it will help individuals, small businesses and large businesses. The focus of their discussion was how and why the new tax rate plan would benefit the economy overall and create more jobs. Switch to MSNBC: Here the larger panel of pundits were focusing (and speculating) on how the new tax rates will benefit Donald Trump. Period. That's all they were talking about. Like you, Fox has bought into the Trump bull****. MSNBC wants to know how many millions the Trumpsters will make off of this, what it will do to the deficits, and how it will devastate what little remains of the social safety net, science, enforcement of anti-pollution and other citizen safety laws. BTW, this wasn't his budget request. It was his proposal for lowering taxes. The rich still pay the highest percentage by far. It really applies to middle class individuals, Sub-S sorporations and large corporations as an incentive to base operations in the USA, expand and hire more Americans. A one time tax will apply for those corporations with their holdings overseas and then a 15 percent (as proposed) tax thereafter. This is very good for the economy of the USA. Really? What about the deficit? His Treasury guy (forget his name) claims the new tax rates will produce something like 5 Trillion in revenues over 5 years. It's a start. That's hilarious. Why's that? I can understand why it could. A robust, growing economy is the largest revenue generating source. Taxes aren't even close. Trump's tax cuts will simply put more money in the hands of the rich, weaken the country and further devastate the lower and middle income families. All that will trickle down is ****. You best cover your head, Krause! Harry's claims are pure BS. His claim that the House and Senate investigations into Russiagate is being drawn out because the Republicans chair the committees is pure BS as well. The Democrats would be screaming bloody murder, especially those on the respective committees. None are complaining, probably because they have yet to find anything to complain about or report. The slowdown has been in the news for several days. Not making headlines that are noticeable. It's probably because the liberal mantra change from "Russia, Russia, Russia" to "Returns, Returns, Returns" is still in process. :Uh huh. Senate Trump-Russia Probe Has No Full-Time Staff, No Key Witnesses The Senate Intelligence Committee’s probe into Russia’s election interference is supposedly the best hope for getting the public credible answers about whether there was any coordination between the Kremlin and Trump Tower. But there are serious reasons to doubt that it can accomplish this task, as currently configured. More than three months after the committee announced that it had agreed on the scope of the investigation, the panel has not begun substantially investigating possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, three individuals with ties to the committee told The Daily Beast. The investigation does not have a single staffer dedicated to it full-time, and those staff members working on it part-time do not have significant investigative experience. The probe currently appears to be moving at a pace slower than prior Senate Intelligence Committee investigations, such as the CIA torture inquiry, which took years to accomplish. No interviews have been conducted with key individuals suspected of being in the Trump-Russia orbit: not Michael Flynn, not Roger Stone, not Carter Page, not Paul Manafort, and not Jared Kushner, according to two sources familiar with the committee’s procedures. http://tinyurl.com/mcvbp6k Excuses, excuses. How about the FBI investigation? Is Comely dragging his feet as well? Hey, did you hear the latest? Rep. Jason Chaffetz announced he will not seek reelection in 2018 in order to spend more time with his family. Your hero, Maxine Waters went on the networks speculating that the real reason is because he's a Russian operative taking orders from the Kremlin and thinks he is about to be exposed. I doubt that is the reason Chaffetz is leaving. Which reason, Chaffetz's or Maxine's? The rumor, unsubstantiated, is that Congressman Jason is about to be "outed" as dirty in some way, possibly relating to bribes or some other sort of graft. Or perhaps he wants to run for Senator. We'll know when we know. As for Ms. Waters, I enjoy her outbursts...colorful and colorful language. Funny. The "rumor" ranges from bribes, some "sort" of graft OR maybe he wants to run for Senator. That's quite a spread, even for an unsubstantiated rumor. Then again, the current lot of Democrats in Congress thrive on "unsubstantiated rumors". Just ask Maxine. |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Amazing reaction to tax announcement
On 4/27/17 8:05 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/27/2017 7:57 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/27/17 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/27/2017 7:51 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/27/17 7:43 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 7:35 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 6:10 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 6:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 5:17 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 5:11 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:39:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 4:15 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 4:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 3:07 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 2:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: As is my hobby, I channel surf after a major political announcement or news, just to get a feel on how the cable networks react. So, after today's announcement of the proposed new tax rates, the panel on FoxNews were kicking around how it will help individuals, small businesses and large businesses. The focus of their discussion was how and why the new tax rate plan would benefit the economy overall and create more jobs. Switch to MSNBC: Here the larger panel of pundits were focusing (and speculating) on how the new tax rates will benefit Donald Trump. Period. That's all they were talking about. Like you, Fox has bought into the Trump bull****. MSNBC wants to know how many millions the Trumpsters will make off of this, what it will do to the deficits, and how it will devastate what little remains of the social safety net, science, enforcement of anti-pollution and other citizen safety laws. BTW, this wasn't his budget request. It was his proposal for lowering taxes. The rich still pay the highest percentage by far. It really applies to middle class individuals, Sub-S sorporations and large corporations as an incentive to base operations in the USA, expand and hire more Americans. A one time tax will apply for those corporations with their holdings overseas and then a 15 percent (as proposed) tax thereafter. This is very good for the economy of the USA. Really? What about the deficit? His Treasury guy (forget his name) claims the new tax rates will produce something like 5 Trillion in revenues over 5 years. It's a start. That's hilarious. Why's that? I can understand why it could. A robust, growing economy is the largest revenue generating source. Taxes aren't even close. Trump's tax cuts will simply put more money in the hands of the rich, weaken the country and further devastate the lower and middle income families. All that will trickle down is ****. You best cover your head, Krause! Harry's claims are pure BS. His claim that the House and Senate investigations into Russiagate is being drawn out because the Republicans chair the committees is pure BS as well. The Democrats would be screaming bloody murder, especially those on the respective committees. None are complaining, probably because they have yet to find anything to complain about or report. The slowdown has been in the news for several days. Not making headlines that are noticeable. It's probably because the liberal mantra change from "Russia, Russia, Russia" to "Returns, Returns, Returns" is still in process. :Uh huh. Senate Trump-Russia Probe Has No Full-Time Staff, No Key Witnesses The Senate Intelligence Committee’s probe into Russia’s election interference is supposedly the best hope for getting the public credible answers about whether there was any coordination between the Kremlin and Trump Tower. But there are serious reasons to doubt that it can accomplish this task, as currently configured. More than three months after the committee announced that it had agreed on the scope of the investigation, the panel has not begun substantially investigating possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, three individuals with ties to the committee told The Daily Beast. The investigation does not have a single staffer dedicated to it full-time, and those staff members working on it part-time do not have significant investigative experience. The probe currently appears to be moving at a pace slower than prior Senate Intelligence Committee investigations, such as the CIA torture inquiry, which took years to accomplish. No interviews have been conducted with key individuals suspected of being in the Trump-Russia orbit: not Michael Flynn, not Roger Stone, not Carter Page, not Paul Manafort, and not Jared Kushner, according to two sources familiar with the committee’s procedures. http://tinyurl.com/mcvbp6k Excuses, excuses. How about the FBI investigation? Is Comely dragging his feet as well? Hey, did you hear the latest? Rep. Jason Chaffetz announced he will not seek reelection in 2018 in order to spend more time with his family. Your hero, Maxine Waters went on the networks speculating that the real reason is because he's a Russian operative taking orders from the Kremlin and thinks he is about to be exposed. I doubt that is the reason Chaffetz is leaving. Which reason, Chaffetz's or Maxine's? The rumor, unsubstantiated, is that Congressman Jason is about to be "outed" as dirty in some way, possibly relating to bribes or some other sort of graft. Or perhaps he wants to run for Senator. We'll know when we know. As for Ms. Waters, I enjoy her outbursts...colorful and colorful language. Funny. The "rumor" ranges from bribes, some "sort" of graft OR maybe he wants to run for Senator. That's quite a spread, even for an unsubstantiated rumor. Then again, the current lot of Democrats in Congress thrive on "unsubstantiated rumors". Just ask Maxine. Oh, these reports were coming from pundits on both sides of the aisle. Actually, I thought one of the rumors was that he wanted to run for guv. In any event, good riddance...he's just another harpy with no substance. |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Amazing reaction to tax announcement
On 4/27/2017 8:10 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/27/17 8:05 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/27/2017 7:57 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/27/17 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/27/2017 7:51 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/27/17 7:43 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 7:35 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 6:10 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 6:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 5:17 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 5:11 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:39:57 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 4:15 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 4:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 4:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/26/2017 3:07 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/26/17 2:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: As is my hobby, I channel surf after a major political announcement or news, just to get a feel on how the cable networks react. So, after today's announcement of the proposed new tax rates, the panel on FoxNews were kicking around how it will help individuals, small businesses and large businesses. The focus of their discussion was how and why the new tax rate plan would benefit the economy overall and create more jobs. Switch to MSNBC: Here the larger panel of pundits were focusing (and speculating) on how the new tax rates will benefit Donald Trump. Period. That's all they were talking about. Like you, Fox has bought into the Trump bull****. MSNBC wants to know how many millions the Trumpsters will make off of this, what it will do to the deficits, and how it will devastate what little remains of the social safety net, science, enforcement of anti-pollution and other citizen safety laws. BTW, this wasn't his budget request. It was his proposal for lowering taxes. The rich still pay the highest percentage by far. It really applies to middle class individuals, Sub-S sorporations and large corporations as an incentive to base operations in the USA, expand and hire more Americans. A one time tax will apply for those corporations with their holdings overseas and then a 15 percent (as proposed) tax thereafter. This is very good for the economy of the USA. Really? What about the deficit? His Treasury guy (forget his name) claims the new tax rates will produce something like 5 Trillion in revenues over 5 years. It's a start. That's hilarious. Why's that? I can understand why it could. A robust, growing economy is the largest revenue generating source. Taxes aren't even close. Trump's tax cuts will simply put more money in the hands of the rich, weaken the country and further devastate the lower and middle income families. All that will trickle down is ****. You best cover your head, Krause! Harry's claims are pure BS. His claim that the House and Senate investigations into Russiagate is being drawn out because the Republicans chair the committees is pure BS as well. The Democrats would be screaming bloody murder, especially those on the respective committees. None are complaining, probably because they have yet to find anything to complain about or report. The slowdown has been in the news for several days. Not making headlines that are noticeable. It's probably because the liberal mantra change from "Russia, Russia, Russia" to "Returns, Returns, Returns" is still in process. :Uh huh. Senate Trump-Russia Probe Has No Full-Time Staff, No Key Witnesses The Senate Intelligence Committee’s probe into Russia’s election interference is supposedly the best hope for getting the public credible answers about whether there was any coordination between the Kremlin and Trump Tower. But there are serious reasons to doubt that it can accomplish this task, as currently configured. More than three months after the committee announced that it had agreed on the scope of the investigation, the panel has not begun substantially investigating possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, three individuals with ties to the committee told The Daily Beast. The investigation does not have a single staffer dedicated to it full-time, and those staff members working on it part-time do not have significant investigative experience. The probe currently appears to be moving at a pace slower than prior Senate Intelligence Committee investigations, such as the CIA torture inquiry, which took years to accomplish. No interviews have been conducted with key individuals suspected of being in the Trump-Russia orbit: not Michael Flynn, not Roger Stone, not Carter Page, not Paul Manafort, and not Jared Kushner, according to two sources familiar with the committee’s procedures. http://tinyurl.com/mcvbp6k Excuses, excuses. How about the FBI investigation? Is Comely dragging his feet as well? Hey, did you hear the latest? Rep. Jason Chaffetz announced he will not seek reelection in 2018 in order to spend more time with his family. Your hero, Maxine Waters went on the networks speculating that the real reason is because he's a Russian operative taking orders from the Kremlin and thinks he is about to be exposed. I doubt that is the reason Chaffetz is leaving. Which reason, Chaffetz's or Maxine's? The rumor, unsubstantiated, is that Congressman Jason is about to be "outed" as dirty in some way, possibly relating to bribes or some other sort of graft. Or perhaps he wants to run for Senator. We'll know when we know. As for Ms. Waters, I enjoy her outbursts...colorful and colorful language. Funny. The "rumor" ranges from bribes, some "sort" of graft OR maybe he wants to run for Senator. That's quite a spread, even for an unsubstantiated rumor. Then again, the current lot of Democrats in Congress thrive on "unsubstantiated rumors". Just ask Maxine. Oh, these reports were coming from pundits on both sides of the aisle. Actually, I thought one of the rumors was that he wanted to run for guv. In any event, good riddance...he's just another harpy with no substance. I know you won't buy this but I'll repeat again what my political leanings are. I am neither a Republican or a Democrat. I've voted for both in the past depending on what the candidate's views are. That said though, I really am getting disgusted with the hypocrisy being exhibited by the Dems right now. Pelosi is so confused and rattled by Trump's daily executive orders that she can't enunciate her reactions in interviews that make any sense at all. Then there's Maxine. I have to admit though, she makes me laugh. I stated before that I'll be the first in line to acknowledge I was wrong about Trump's intentions if a Russian connection is *proven* or if his tax proposals show that he benefits in a direct way at the expense of us mere mortals. I happen to believe in capitalism as the prime economic mover for the USA. Everyone at one time dreams of becoming a millionaire. That's good because in the USA you *can*, given the opportunity and desire. Many of our legal immigrants have demonstrated that. They came here for the opportunity in most cases. Programs and policies that depress economic growth (like those we've had for the past 8 years) only serve to make people more dependent on the government for their welfare. We are not like Switzerland, Sweden or any of the much more socialist European nations and we shouldn't resign ourselves to becoming like them. |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Amazing reaction to tax announcement
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 07:57:03 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: As for Ms. Waters, I enjoy her outbursts...colorful and colorful language. The only difference between Palin and Waters is party slant and skin color ... but that is all it takes for you. |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Amazing reaction to tax announcement
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How's Your Reaction Time? | General | |||
GE's reaction to Obamanomics | General | |||
Weird reaction.. | General | |||
Amazing, simply amazing! | General | |||
Amazing, simply amazing! | General |