It you think you still have the same reaction time as you did at age
18, think again. This test is a bit of an eye opener.

https://www.justpark.com/creative/reaction-time-test/

I did a bit better than average for my age but it's quite clear that
I've lost something.

On Tuesday, January 5, 2016 at 7:01:27 PM UTC-6, wrote:
It you think you still have the same reaction time as you did at age
18, think again. This test is a bit of an eye opener.

https://www.justpark.com/creative/reaction-time-test/

I did a bit better than average for my age but it's quite clear that
I've lost something.

Wow, I'm 29!

On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:10:00 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Tuesday, January 5, 2016 at 7:01:27 PM UTC-6, wrote:
It you think you still have the same reaction time as you did at age
18, think again. This test is a bit of an eye opener.

https://www.justpark.com/creative/reaction-time-test/

I did a bit better than average for my age but it's quite clear that
I've lost something.

Wow, I'm 29!

Me too and once it asked if I was human ;-)
The first one was 41 and that probably bent the curve. I had a lot of
18, 19 and 20

7:56
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:10:00 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:
- show quoted text -
Me too and once it asked if I was human ;-)
The first one was 41 and that probably bent the curve. I had a lot of
18, 19 and 20
-----

My first try was 41 then consistently 29 that is, once I saw what was going on

On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:10:00 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Tuesday, January 5, 2016 at 7:01:27 PM UTC-6, wrote:
It you think you still have the same reaction time as you did at age
18, think again. This test is a bit of an eye opener.

https://www.justpark.com/creative/reaction-time-test/

I did a bit better than average for my age but it's quite clear that
I've lost something.

Wow, I'm 29!

I tried with my right hand and I am 25 ;-)

http://gfretwell.com/ftp/reaction%20time.jpg

I was surprised how many "are you human" things I got (296 ms)
Either this game is flawed or I am a spry old geezer at 69

On 1/5/2016 8:01 PM, wrote:
It you think you still have the same reaction time as you did at age
18, think again. This test is a bit of an eye opener.

https://www.justpark.com/creative/reaction-time-test/

I did a bit better than average for my age but it's quite clear that
I've lost something.



That's pretty cool. I think I did ok for my real age.
I tried it three times at got 34, 20 and 25.
Considering that I am 66, that's not too bad, I think.

25 years old at the age of 66. Still got it.

On 1/5/2016 7:01 PM, wrote:
It you think you still have the same reaction time as you did at age
18, think again. This test is a bit of an eye opener.

https://www.justpark.com/creative/reaction-time-test/

I did a bit better than average for my age but it's quite clear that
I've lost something.


I did it three times, I got 44yrs, 28yrs, and 23yrs, I'm getting better
with age. I'm 60yrs old.

Mikek

On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:10:00 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Tuesday, January 5, 2016 at 7:01:27 PM UTC-6, wrote:
It you think you still have the same reaction time as you did at age
18, think again. This test is a bit of an eye opener.

https://www.justpark.com/creative/reaction-time-test/

I did a bit better than average for my age but it's quite clear that
I've lost something.

Wow, I'm 29!

Ditto. Stopped there.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 02:08:44 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 1/5/2016 8:01 PM, wrote:
It you think you still have the same reaction time as you did at age
18, think again. This test is a bit of an eye opener.

https://www.justpark.com/creative/reaction-time-test/

I did a bit better than average for my age but it's quite clear that
I've lost something.



That's pretty cool. I think I did ok for my real age.
I tried it three times at got 34, 20 and 25.
Considering that I am 66, that's not too bad, I think.

I bet that is typical. The more I did it the better I got at it.
By my 3d try, I was under 296ms (the 18 YO bogie) almost half of the
time.