On 3/13/17 3:32 PM, Tim wrote:
Does this go along with the notion of "give us free birth control but stay out of our bedroom...?"



Poor right-wing thumpers...eventually losing the ability to control women.

2:46 PMKeyser Soze
On 3/13/17 3:32 PM, Tim wrote:
Does this go along with the notion of "give us free birth control but stay out of our bedroom...?"



Poor right-wing thumpers...eventually losing the ability to control women.
.....
Whatever that had to do with anything?

Why blurt out stuff like that for no real reason, Harry?

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:46:10 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 3/13/17 3:32 PM, Tim wrote:
Does this go along with the notion of "give us free birth control but stay out of our bedroom...?"



Poor right-wing thumpers...eventually losing the ability to control women.

What does free birth control have to do with controlling women?
(one way or the other)
The pills work out to about 30 cents a day, not a huge cost when a
bottle of nail polish is $10 and they pay $100 to do their hair in
hope that they can attract someone to sleep with them.

OTOH I think poor women should get free birth control and free
abortions. It saves many times over on welfare and social costs.
"Control" is not even an issue there. Most are, by any definition, out
of control.

On 3/13/17 4:57 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:46:10 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 3/13/17 3:32 PM, Tim wrote:
Does this go along with the notion of "give us free birth control but stay out of our bedroom...?"



Poor right-wing thumpers...eventually losing the ability to control women.

What does free birth control have to do with controlling women?
(one way or the other)

Crikey...it's the lack of free birth control that controls women who
can't afford it.

On Monday, March 13, 2017 at 4:08:20 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/13/17 4:57 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:46:10 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 3/13/17 3:32 PM, Tim wrote:
Does this go along with the notion of "give us free birth control but stay out of our bedroom...?"



Poor right-wing thumpers...eventually losing the ability to control women.

What does free birth control have to do with controlling women?
(one way or the other)

Crikey...it's the lack of free birth control that controls women who
can't afford it.

Harry, If you went to say, the Fairfield district of Baltimore and randomly handed out free condoms, I'm sure the women there would thank you for freeing them from tyranny. Just think, you could sleep better at night knowing that you did your part in destroying the "war on women"

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:43:33 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Monday, March 13, 2017 at 4:08:20 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/13/17 4:57 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:46:10 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 3/13/17 3:32 PM, Tim wrote:
Does this go along with the notion of "give us free birth control but stay out of our bedroom...?"



Poor right-wing thumpers...eventually losing the ability to control women.

What does free birth control have to do with controlling women?
(one way or the other)

Crikey...it's the lack of free birth control that controls women who
can't afford it.

Harry, If you went to say, the Fairfield district of Baltimore and randomly handed out free condoms, I'm sure the women there would thank you for freeing them from tyranny. Just think, you could sleep better at night knowing that you did your part in destroying the "war on women"

Norplant would be a better idea. It is passive birth control.

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 17:08:19 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 3/13/17 4:57 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:46:10 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 3/13/17 3:32 PM, Tim wrote:
Does this go along with the notion of "give us free birth control but stay out of our bedroom...?"



Poor right-wing thumpers...eventually losing the ability to control women.

What does free birth control have to do with controlling women?
(one way or the other)

Crikey...it's the lack of free birth control that controls women who
can't afford it.

If it actually controlled them they would keep their knees together
and not get pregnant. As I said, they are the ones who are the most
out of control. That demographic is also over represented in drug
addiction, tobacco use, alcohol abuse and criminal activity.
If you have a 2 pack a day cigarette habit, you can afford a 30 cent
birth control pill.

All that said, as a cheap son of a bitch, I would still give them free
birth control and abortions. It is money well spent. I have trouble
understanding people who don't feel that way. You certainly can't call
them racist.

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 19:07:27 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 17:08:19 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 3/13/17 4:57 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:46:10 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 3/13/17 3:32 PM, Tim wrote:
Does this go along with the notion of "give us free birth control but stay out of our bedroom...?"



Poor right-wing thumpers...eventually losing the ability to control women.

What does free birth control have to do with controlling women?
(one way or the other)

Crikey...it's the lack of free birth control that controls women who
can't afford it.

If it actually controlled them they would keep their knees together
and not get pregnant. As I said, they are the ones who are the most
out of control. That demographic is also over represented in drug
addiction, tobacco use, alcohol abuse and criminal activity.
If you have a 2 pack a day cigarette habit, you can afford a 30 cent
birth control pill.

All that said, as a cheap son of a bitch, I would still give them free
birth control and abortions. It is money well spent. I have trouble
understanding people who don't feel that way. You certainly can't call
them racist.

Some folks just don't like the idea of killing unborn babies, free or not.

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:04:20 -0400, Poco Deplorevole
wrote:

All that said, as a cheap son of a bitch, I would still give them free
birth control and abortions. It is money well spent. I have trouble
understanding people who don't feel that way. You certainly can't call
them racist.

Some folks just don't like the idea of killing unborn babies, free or not.

Why not? If they have a 20-30% chance of dying in prison with a string
of victims in their wake, what are you waiting for?
Nobody really wants to look at the statistics of the future for the
child of an unwed mother in the ghetto.
When you make an indigent 15 year old have a baby, you destroy 2
lives. Adoption isn't even a viable option. Angela Jolie and Madonna
may go to Africa to adopt a black kid but they won't go to Detroit for
one.

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:54:46 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:04:20 -0400, Poco Deplorevole
wrote:

All that said, as a cheap son of a bitch, I would still give them free
birth control and abortions. It is money well spent. I have trouble
understanding people who don't feel that way. You certainly can't call
them racist.

Some folks just don't like the idea of killing unborn babies, free or not.



Why not? If they have a 20-30% chance of dying in prison with a string
of victims in their wake, what are you waiting for?

If that statistic is true, then they have a 70-80% chance of *not* dying in prison...etc.

Nobody really wants to look at the statistics of the future for the
child of an unwed mother in the ghetto.

I'm all for free birth control.

When you make an indigent 15 year old have a baby, you destroy 2
lives.

Start 'em on free birth control at 14.

Adoption isn't even a viable option. Angela Jolie and Madonna
may go to Africa to adopt a black kid but they won't go to Detroit for
one.