Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
This...from the LA Times?
Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html "Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy Grail. Will the Sessions revelations help them?" From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also. Funny! |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
This...from the LA Times?
On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job. http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html "Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy Grail. Will the Sessions revelations help them?" From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also. Funny! Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador". Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator". Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation." Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the Russian Ambassador. McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10 years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the Russian ambassador. Ever." But, here's a couple of tweets she made: The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador." Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German Ambassadors Iran deal." She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
This...from the LA Times?
On 3/2/17 4:00 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job. http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html "Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy Grail. Will the Sessions revelations help them?" From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also. Funny! Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador". Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator". Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation." Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the Russian Ambassador. McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10 years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the Russian ambassador. Ever." But, here's a couple of tweets she made: The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador." Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German Ambassadors Iran deal." She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her. You are *so* in the bag for Trump. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
This...from the LA Times?
On 3/2/2017 4:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/2/17 4:00 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job. http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html "Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy Grail. Will the Sessions revelations help them?" From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also. Funny! Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador". Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator". Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation." Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the Russian Ambassador. McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10 years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the Russian ambassador. Ever." But, here's a couple of tweets she made: The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador." Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German Ambassadors Iran deal." She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her. You are *so* in the bag for Trump. I don't expect you to understand this but I am not "in the bag" for Trump. I am absolutely disgusted with the despicable actions by your party however. Showing their true colors and they aren't red, white and blue, that's for sure. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
This...from the LA Times?
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:00:49 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job. http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html "Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy Grail. Will the Sessions revelations help them?" From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also. Funny! Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador". Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator". Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation." Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the Russian Ambassador. McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10 years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the Russian ambassador. Ever." But, here's a couple of tweets she made: The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador." Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German Ambassadors Iran deal." She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her. Lying is OK if you're an FPL, or if your name is Krause. Oh wait, that's redundant. |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
This...from the LA Times?
On 3/2/2017 4:22 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:00:49 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job. http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html "Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy Grail. Will the Sessions revelations help them?" From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also. Funny! Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador". Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator". Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation." Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the Russian Ambassador. McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10 years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the Russian ambassador. Ever." But, here's a couple of tweets she made: The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador." Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German Ambassadors Iran deal." She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her. Lying is OK if you're an FPL, or if your name is Krause. Oh wait, that's redundant. One of the cable news outlets (I think it was FoxNews) just ran the long version and full video of Sessions being questioned by Al Franken during Sessions' confirmation hearings. Franken cited a new report (it had just come out) by CNN that claimed that Russian "operatives" had damning evidence on Trump and that Trump campaign surrogates had been meeting regularly with the Russian operatives regarding this evidence. Franken then asked Sessions that if the CNN story was true, had he participated in these "meetings". Sessions said he knew nothing about it, had not met with any Russians and could not comment on it. *This* is the context of the idiotic claims the disposable Democrats are making now. Sessions *did* briefly meet the Russian ambassador twice in his role as a member of the Senate Armed Service Committee, something that is routine and had nothing to do with "Russian operatives" and damning "evidence" they claimed to have on Trump. Pull the plug. Drain the swamp. |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
This...from the LA Times?
On 3/2/2017 4:39 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/2/2017 4:22 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:00:49 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job. http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html "Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy Grail. Will the Sessions revelations help them?" From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also. Funny! Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador". Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator". Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation." Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the Russian Ambassador. McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10 years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the Russian ambassador. Ever." But, here's a couple of tweets she made: The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador." Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German Ambassadors Iran deal." She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her. Lying is OK if you're an FPL, or if your name is Krause. Oh wait, that's redundant. One of the cable news outlets (I think it was FoxNews) just ran the long version and full video of Sessions being questioned by Al Franken during Sessions' confirmation hearings. Franken cited a new report (it had just come out) by CNN that claimed that Russian "operatives" had damning evidence on Trump and that Trump campaign surrogates had been meeting regularly with the Russian operatives regarding this evidence. Franken then asked Sessions that if the CNN story was true, had he participated in these "meetings". Sessions said he knew nothing about it, had not met with any Russians and could not comment on it. *This* is the context of the idiotic claims the disposable Democrats are making now. Sessions *did* briefly meet the Russian ambassador twice in his role as a member of the Senate Armed Service Committee, something that is routine and had nothing to do with "Russian operatives" and damning "evidence" they claimed to have on Trump. Pull the plug. Drain the swamp. Heh. Auto correct changed "despicable" Democrats to "disposable" Democrats. That works also. :-) |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
This...from the LA Times?
On 3/2/17 4:39 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/2/2017 4:22 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:00:49 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job. http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html "Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy Grail. Will the Sessions revelations help them?" From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also. Funny! Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador". Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator". Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation." Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the Russian Ambassador. McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10 years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the Russian ambassador. Ever." But, here's a couple of tweets she made: The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador." Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German Ambassadors Iran deal." She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her. Lying is OK if you're an FPL, or if your name is Krause. Oh wait, that's redundant. One of the cable news outlets (I think it was FoxNews) just ran the long version and full video of Sessions being questioned by Al Franken during Sessions' confirmation hearings. Franken cited a new report (it had just come out) by CNN that claimed that Russian "operatives" had damning evidence on Trump and that Trump campaign surrogates had been meeting regularly with the Russian operatives regarding this evidence. Franken then asked Sessions that if the CNN story was true, had he participated in these "meetings". Sessions said he knew nothing about it, had not met with any Russians and could not comment on it. *This* is the context of the idiotic claims the disposable Democrats are making now. Sessions *did* briefly meet the Russian ambassador twice in his role as a member of the Senate Armed Service Committee, something that is routine and had nothing to do with "Russian operatives" and damning "evidence" they claimed to have on Trump. You have no way of knowing that. And Sessions just partially recused himself in possible investigations. Partial recusal isn't enough. |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
This...from the LA Times?
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:39:50 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 3/2/2017 4:22 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:00:49 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job. http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html "Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy Grail. Will the Sessions revelations help them?" From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also. Funny! Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador". Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator". Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation." Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the Russian Ambassador. McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10 years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the Russian ambassador. Ever." But, here's a couple of tweets she made: The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador." Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German Ambassadors Iran deal." She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her. Lying is OK if you're an FPL, or if your name is Krause. Oh wait, that's redundant. One of the cable news outlets (I think it was FoxNews) just ran the long version and full video of Sessions being questioned by Al Franken during Sessions' confirmation hearings. Franken cited a new report (it had just come out) by CNN that claimed that Russian "operatives" had damning evidence on Trump and that Trump campaign surrogates had been meeting regularly with the Russian operatives regarding this evidence. Franken then asked Sessions that if the CNN story was true, had he participated in these "meetings". Sessions said he knew nothing about it, had not met with any Russians and could not comment on it. *This* is the context of the idiotic claims the disposable Democrats are making now. Sessions *did* briefly meet the Russian ambassador twice in his role as a member of the Senate Armed Service Committee, something that is routine and had nothing to do with "Russian operatives" and damning "evidence" they claimed to have on Trump. Pull the plug. Drain the swamp. Thanks for the background. I was pretty sure it was more bull**** from the FDPLs. (I had to add 'despicable' to the acronym.) |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
This...from the LA Times?
On Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 3:04:23 PM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/2/17 4:00 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job. http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html "Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy Grail. Will the Sessions revelations help them?" From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also. Funny! Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador". Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator". Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation." Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the Russian Ambassador. McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10 years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the Russian ambassador. Ever." But, here's a couple of tweets she made: The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador." Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German Ambassadors Iran deal." She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her. You are *so* in the bag for Trump. whos bag are you in, Harry? Did he or did she not meat with the Russian ambassador? You would know... |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dragon Lady, Ruff Times and High Times | Cruising | |||
January 1 - It was the best of times, it was the worst of times... | Cruising | |||
Sad times | ASA | |||
Who but the Times... | ASA | |||
Sad Times Indeed...for now | ASA |