This...from the LA Times?
 

Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html

"Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy Grail. Will the Sessions
revelations help them?"

From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also.

Funny!

This...from the LA Times?
 

On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html

"Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy Grail. Will the Sessions
revelations help them?"

From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also.

Funny!



Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador".

Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator".

Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation."


Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the
Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the
Russian Ambassador.

McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10
years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the
Russian ambassador. Ever."

But, here's a couple of tweets she made:

The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador."

Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German
Ambassadors Iran deal."

She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her.

This...from the LA Times?
 

On 3/2/17 4:00 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html


"Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy
Grail. Will the Sessions
revelations help them?"

From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also.

Funny!



Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador".

Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator".

Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation."


Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the
Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the
Russian Ambassador.

McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10
years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the
Russian ambassador. Ever."

But, here's a couple of tweets she made:

The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador."

Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German
Ambassadors Iran deal."

She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her.




You are *so* in the bag for Trump.

This...from the LA Times?
 

On 3/2/2017 4:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/2/17 4:00 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html



"Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy
Grail. Will the Sessions
revelations help them?"

From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also.

Funny!



Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador".

Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator".

Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation."


Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the
Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the
Russian Ambassador.

McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10
years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the
Russian ambassador. Ever."

But, here's a couple of tweets she made:

The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador."

Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German
Ambassadors Iran deal."

She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her.




You are *so* in the bag for Trump.


I don't expect you to understand this but I am not "in the bag" for
Trump. I am absolutely disgusted with the despicable actions by your
party however. Showing their true colors and they aren't red, white and
blue, that's for sure.

This...from the LA Times?
 

On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:00:49 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html

"Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy Grail. Will the Sessions
revelations help them?"

From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also.

Funny!



Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador".

Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator".

Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation."


Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the
Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the
Russian Ambassador.

McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10
years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the
Russian ambassador. Ever."

But, here's a couple of tweets she made:

The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador."

Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German
Ambassadors Iran deal."

She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her.


Lying is OK if you're an FPL, or if your name is Krause. Oh wait, that's redundant.

This...from the LA Times?
 

On 3/2/2017 4:22 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:00:49 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html

"Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy Grail. Will the Sessions
revelations help them?"

From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also.

Funny!



Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador".

Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator".

Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation."


Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the
Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the
Russian Ambassador.

McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10
years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the
Russian ambassador. Ever."

But, here's a couple of tweets she made:

The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador."

Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German
Ambassadors Iran deal."

She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her.


Lying is OK if you're an FPL, or if your name is Krause. Oh wait, that's redundant.



One of the cable news outlets (I think it was FoxNews) just ran the
long version and full video of Sessions being questioned by Al Franken
during Sessions' confirmation hearings. Franken cited a new report (it
had just come out) by CNN that claimed that Russian "operatives" had
damning evidence on Trump and that Trump campaign surrogates had been
meeting regularly with the Russian operatives regarding this evidence.
Franken then asked Sessions that if the CNN story was true, had he
participated in these "meetings".

Sessions said he knew nothing about it, had not met with any Russians
and could not comment on it.

*This* is the context of the idiotic claims the disposable Democrats are
making now. Sessions *did* briefly meet the Russian ambassador twice in
his role as a member of the Senate Armed Service Committee, something
that is routine and had nothing to do with "Russian operatives" and
damning "evidence" they claimed to have on Trump.

Pull the plug. Drain the swamp.

This...from the LA Times?
 

On 3/2/2017 4:39 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/2/2017 4:22 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:00:49 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html


"Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy
Grail. Will the Sessions
revelations help them?"

From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also.

Funny!



Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador".

Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator".

Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation."


Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the
Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the
Russian Ambassador.

McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10
years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the
Russian ambassador. Ever."

But, here's a couple of tweets she made:

The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian
Ambassador."

Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German
Ambassadors Iran deal."

She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her.


Lying is OK if you're an FPL, or if your name is Krause. Oh wait,
that's redundant.



One of the cable news outlets (I think it was FoxNews) just ran the
long version and full video of Sessions being questioned by Al Franken
during Sessions' confirmation hearings. Franken cited a new report (it
had just come out) by CNN that claimed that Russian "operatives" had
damning evidence on Trump and that Trump campaign surrogates had been
meeting regularly with the Russian operatives regarding this evidence.
Franken then asked Sessions that if the CNN story was true, had he
participated in these "meetings".

Sessions said he knew nothing about it, had not met with any Russians
and could not comment on it.

*This* is the context of the idiotic claims the disposable Democrats are
making now. Sessions *did* briefly meet the Russian ambassador twice in
his role as a member of the Senate Armed Service Committee, something
that is routine and had nothing to do with "Russian operatives" and
damning "evidence" they claimed to have on Trump.

Pull the plug. Drain the swamp.


Heh. Auto correct changed "despicable" Democrats to "disposable"
Democrats. That works also. :-)

This...from the LA Times?
 

On 3/2/17 4:39 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/2/2017 4:22 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:00:49 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html


"Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy
Grail. Will the Sessions
revelations help them?"

From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also.

Funny!



Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador".

Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator".

Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation."


Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the
Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the
Russian Ambassador.

McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10
years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the
Russian ambassador. Ever."

But, here's a couple of tweets she made:

The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian
Ambassador."

Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German
Ambassadors Iran deal."

She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her.


Lying is OK if you're an FPL, or if your name is Krause. Oh wait,
that's redundant.



One of the cable news outlets (I think it was FoxNews) just ran the
long version and full video of Sessions being questioned by Al Franken
during Sessions' confirmation hearings. Franken cited a new report (it
had just come out) by CNN that claimed that Russian "operatives" had
damning evidence on Trump and that Trump campaign surrogates had been
meeting regularly with the Russian operatives regarding this evidence.
Franken then asked Sessions that if the CNN story was true, had he
participated in these "meetings".

Sessions said he knew nothing about it, had not met with any Russians
and could not comment on it.

*This* is the context of the idiotic claims the disposable Democrats are
making now. Sessions *did* briefly meet the Russian ambassador twice in
his role as a member of the Senate Armed Service Committee, something
that is routine and had nothing to do with "Russian operatives" and
damning "evidence" they claimed to have on Trump.


You have no way of knowing that. And Sessions just partially recused
himself in possible investigations. Partial recusal isn't enough.

This...from the LA Times?
 

On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:39:50 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 3/2/2017 4:22 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:00:49 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html

"Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy Grail. Will the Sessions
revelations help them?"

From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also.

Funny!



Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador".

Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator".

Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation."


Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the
Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the
Russian Ambassador.

McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10
years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the
Russian ambassador. Ever."

But, here's a couple of tweets she made:

The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador."

Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German
Ambassadors Iran deal."

She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her.


Lying is OK if you're an FPL, or if your name is Krause. Oh wait, that's redundant.



One of the cable news outlets (I think it was FoxNews) just ran the
long version and full video of Sessions being questioned by Al Franken
during Sessions' confirmation hearings. Franken cited a new report (it
had just come out) by CNN that claimed that Russian "operatives" had
damning evidence on Trump and that Trump campaign surrogates had been
meeting regularly with the Russian operatives regarding this evidence.
Franken then asked Sessions that if the CNN story was true, had he
participated in these "meetings".

Sessions said he knew nothing about it, had not met with any Russians
and could not comment on it.

*This* is the context of the idiotic claims the disposable Democrats are
making now. Sessions *did* briefly meet the Russian ambassador twice in
his role as a member of the Senate Armed Service Committee, something
that is routine and had nothing to do with "Russian operatives" and
damning "evidence" they claimed to have on Trump.

Pull the plug. Drain the swamp.

Thanks for the background. I was pretty sure it was more bull**** from the FDPLs. (I had to add
'despicable' to the acronym.)

This...from the LA Times?
 

On Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 3:04:23 PM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/2/17 4:00 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/2/2017 2:14 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
Wow. Surely the author will lose his/her job.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...302-story.html


"Proving Trump colluded in Russian hacking is the Democrats' Holy
Grail. Will the Sessions
revelations help them?"

From his posts, this is probably Harry's 'Holy Grail' also.

Funny!



Senator Sessions: "Happy Holidays, Ambassador".

Russian Ambassador: "Same back atcha, Senator".

Pelosi: "I demand Sessions' resignation."


Just for the record, here's another member (Claire McCaskill -D) of the
Senate Armed Services Committee who claimed to have *never* met with the
Russian Ambassador.

McCASKILL: "I've been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10
years, and in that time, have had no call from, or meeting with, the
Russian ambassador. Ever."

But, here's a couple of tweets she made:

The first, on Jan. 30, 2013, says: "Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador."

Then, on Aug. 6, 2015, "Today calls with British, Russian and German
Ambassadors Iran deal."

She should resign and take Pelosi, Warren and Schumer with her.




You are *so* in the bag for Trump.


whos bag are you in, Harry? Did he or did she not meat with the Russian ambassador? You would know...