Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/13/2016 6:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and
Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the
election, the latest claim by the liberal left?

Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically
hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible.

The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of
certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty
who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks.
Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are
claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either.

It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and
caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on
the security surveillance system.




Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted
didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber.
You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it.
Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it.


My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate
question.

It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision.
That's real impressive Trumpster.
Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well.
I hope Trump does well for you.


Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh?

I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you.
He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20.

I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I won't be.



Well, as much as I am pleased that Hillary won't be running the US
government for the next four years, I think the Donald has some very
serious legal problems ahead. The Constitution specifically forbids him
from personally benefiting in any way through payments or dealings with
any foreign country. Trump has real estate holdings throughout the
world. Unless he sells them all off before Jan 20, it means that if
anybody from another country stays at one of his hotels or even buys a
drink at the hotel bar, Trump is technically in violation of the
Constitution. He's talking about transferring the management to his
sons but that's apparently not enough legally. He postponed a news
conference at which he was going to explain what he was going to do. I
have a hunch that the postponement is because his legal beagles have
advised him that his "solution" isn't going to cut it. Going to be
interesting.




Blind trust, son in charge. Will be very similar to most other POTUS. So
if you have stock in Exxon, you fail the test?

On 12/13/2016 7:16 PM, Califbill wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/13/2016 6:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and
Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the
election, the latest claim by the liberal left?

Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically
hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible.

The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of
certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty
who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks.
Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are
claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either.

It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and
caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on
the security surveillance system.




Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted
didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber.
You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it.
Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it.


My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate
question.

It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision.
That's real impressive Trumpster.
Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well.
I hope Trump does well for you.


Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh?

I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you.
He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20.

I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I won't be.



Well, as much as I am pleased that Hillary won't be running the US
government for the next four years, I think the Donald has some very
serious legal problems ahead. The Constitution specifically forbids him
from personally benefiting in any way through payments or dealings with
any foreign country. Trump has real estate holdings throughout the
world. Unless he sells them all off before Jan 20, it means that if
anybody from another country stays at one of his hotels or even buys a
drink at the hotel bar, Trump is technically in violation of the
Constitution. He's talking about transferring the management to his
sons but that's apparently not enough legally. He postponed a news
conference at which he was going to explain what he was going to do. I
have a hunch that the postponement is because his legal beagles have
advised him that his "solution" isn't going to cut it. Going to be
interesting.




Blind trust, son in charge. Will be very similar to most other POTUS. So
if you have stock in Exxon, you fail the test?



According to many legal beagles a blind trust isn't possible in Trump's
case.

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 19:20:01 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/13/2016 7:16 PM, Califbill wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:

Well, as much as I am pleased that Hillary won't be running the US
government for the next four years, I think the Donald has some very
serious legal problems ahead. The Constitution specifically forbids him
from personally benefiting in any way through payments or dealings with
any foreign country. Trump has real estate holdings throughout the
world. Unless he sells them all off before Jan 20, it means that if
anybody from another country stays at one of his hotels or even buys a
drink at the hotel bar, Trump is technically in violation of the
Constitution. He's talking about transferring the management to his
sons but that's apparently not enough legally. He postponed a news
conference at which he was going to explain what he was going to do. I
have a hunch that the postponement is because his legal beagles have
advised him that his "solution" isn't going to cut it. Going to be
interesting.




Blind trust, son in charge. Will be very similar to most other POTUS. So
if you have stock in Exxon, you fail the test?



According to many legal beagles a blind trust isn't possible in Trump's
case.

I am still not convinced Trump will be able to actually serve and
still have anything named Trump anywhere. I suppose if he gives the
whole thing to the kids, divests any personal interest at all and
shows no money flowing to him, he might get away with it.
He may point to the Kennedy clan, the Bush holdings and Billy's gas
station as examples of family members running businesses while they
were president. Nobody seemed concerned with Kerry and Heinz that
sells ketchup all over the world. He lost because he was Kerry.