|
Russian hacking?
Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and
Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. |
Russian hacking?
On Monday, December 12, 2016 at 6:28:10 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Ask Harry. He'll know... |
Russian hacking?
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 19:28:03 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. Yeah, this is the kind of thing the media does on a regular basis. Usually it is only when they have dirt on a conservative tho. As I have said, it only points out how the DNC was trying to corrupt the election process by playing dirty tricks on Bernie and feeding Hillary the debate questions before the CNN debate, although I doubt those softballs would really surprise anyone. The leak itself could as easily been a disgruntled Bernie supporter inside the DNC. Assange did not tell us where he got the Emails. I doubt it changed a single vote either way. All I have heard as "proof" is they see a russian IP address in the traffic but if you are that good, you will spoof your IP address or just launch the attack from somewhere else. If the russians really wanted to hide an attack, they would launch it from Syria or some other place with so many bad actors around that nobody would know who to blame. I think the Israelis would have had more reason to want Trump than Putin and they have all of these cyber skills. Did you see Netanyahu the other day on 60 minutes. He is downright giddy that Trump won and had nothing but good things to say about him. THAT is scary. It will be hard to get the coastal DNC people or the CIA to point the finger at them, even if they knew they did it. Have you heard about how hard they worked to cover up the Israelis blowing the cover on Stuxnet? |
Russian hacking?
|
Russian hacking?
|
Russian hacking?
On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. |
Russian hacking?
In article ,
says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. |
Russian hacking?
On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh? I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you. He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20. |
Russian hacking?
"Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message:
On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. What's he angry about. The Donald is just a red blooded man doing what most men do. As for lying, the Donald isn't noted for that trait. Snowflake might be an OK descripter for our violent and confused little boy. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com