Russian hacking?
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/14/16 7:27 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 7:02:03 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/13/2016 6:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and
Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing
the
election, the latest claim by the liberal left?

Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were
electronically
hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible.

The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the
release of
certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent
certainty
who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to
Wikileaks.
Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary
campaign, are
claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt
authentic either.

It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video
camera and
caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested,
blaming it on
the security surveillance system.




Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result
you wanted
didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber.
You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it.
Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it.


My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a
legitimate
question.

It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision.
That's real impressive Trumpster.
Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well.
I hope Trump does well for you.


Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh?

I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you.
He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20.

I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I won't be.



Well, as much as I am pleased that Hillary won't be running the US
government for the next four years, I think the Donald has some very
serious legal problems ahead. The Constitution specifically forbids
him
from personally benefiting in any way through payments or dealings with
any foreign country. Trump has real estate holdings throughout the
world. Unless he sells them all off before Jan 20, it means that if
anybody from another country stays at one of his hotels or even buys a
drink at the hotel bar, Trump is technically in violation of the
Constitution. He's talking about transferring the management to his
sons but that's apparently not enough legally. He postponed a news
conference at which he was going to explain what he was going to do. I
have a hunch that the postponement is because his legal beagles have
advised him that his "solution" isn't going to cut it. Going to be
interesting.

Since when was breaking the law and serving as potus mutually exclusive?



I am so looking forward to watching Trump and his family members get
themselves into one serious ethical and legal problem after another
while they destroy the country and his sleazy cabinet officers and
other high officials destroy the
agencies they are supposed to run and defend for the commonweal.
Wow...an oil baron and buddy buddy of Russia for secretary of
state...what could go wrong?The moronic ex governor of Texas as energy
czar. What's next, Godzilla as ambassador to Japan? Will those coal
miners who voted for Trump get ****ed out of their pensions and health
benefits by the Republicans and Trump?



Coal miners are not government workers.

Russian hacking?
 

Poco Loco wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 20:01:49 -0500, Alex wrote:

True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 12:36:19 UTC-4, Justine giggles...
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
justan wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message:
On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...
On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...
Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and
Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the
election, the latest claim by the liberal left?

Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically
hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible.

The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of
certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty
who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks.
Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are
claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either.

It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and
caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on
the security surveillance system.

Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted
didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber.
You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it.
Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it.

My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate
question.
It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision.
That's real impressive Trumpster.
Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well.
I hope Trump does well for you.

Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh?

I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you.
He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20.


Trump says he wants to act as president for ALL the people. I
don't know why BAO doesn't embrace that new concept.

Trump says a lot of things...and it is mostly bull****.

--
Posted with my iPhone 7+.

Your entire act is bull****. I can't remember the last time you
told the truth about anything that matters.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
The truth.... you couldn't handle the truth!
Damn, that was lame.
Donald's admission that you don't get the truth from Harry is a sign that he's maturing.

I'll give him that. Maybe he's getting tired of Krause's bull****, too.

Russian hacking?
 

On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 10:51:17 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/14/16 8:57 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 8:12:10 AM UTC-5, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:04:05 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 12/14/16 7:27 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 7:02:03 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/13/2016 6:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and
Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the
election, the latest claim by the liberal left?

Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically
hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible.

The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of
certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty
who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks.
Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are
claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either.

It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and
caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on
the security surveillance system.




Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted
didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber.
You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it.
Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it.


My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate
question.

It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision.
That's real impressive Trumpster.
Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well.
I hope Trump does well for you.


Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh?

I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you.
He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20.

I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I won't be.



Well, as much as I am pleased that Hillary won't be running the US
government for the next four years, I think the Donald has some very
serious legal problems ahead. The Constitution specifically forbids him
from personally benefiting in any way through payments or dealings with
any foreign country. Trump has real estate holdings throughout the
world. Unless he sells them all off before Jan 20, it means that if
anybody from another country stays at one of his hotels or even buys a
drink at the hotel bar, Trump is technically in violation of the
Constitution. He's talking about transferring the management to his
sons but that's apparently not enough legally. He postponed a news
conference at which he was going to explain what he was going to do.. I
have a hunch that the postponement is because his legal beagles have
advised him that his "solution" isn't going to cut it. Going to be
interesting.

Since when was breaking the law and serving as potus mutually exclusive?



I am so looking forward to watching Trump and his family members get
themselves into one serious ethical and legal problem after another
while they destroy the country and his sleazy cabinet officers and other
high officials destroy the
agencies they are supposed to run and defend for the commonweal.
Wow...an oil baron and buddy buddy of Russia for secretary of
state...what could go wrong?The moronic ex governor of Texas as energy
czar. What's next, Godzilla as ambassador to Japan? Will those coal
miners who voted for Trump get ****ed out of their pensions and health
benefits by the Republicans and Trump?


We're happy to see you're looking forward to Trump destroying the country in which you live.

Yeah, that's so weird. Why would you want your own country "destroyed"? I haven't been happy with some of the choices for potus in the past, but I never looked forward to them doing harm to my country. In fact, I I hoped they would do well and cause the least harm possible.

It's just another sign that the old boy has lost it.



*My* country wouldn't elect a racist, xeonophobic, woman-hating, asshole
like Trump who makes fun of the handicapped. But *your* country did.
We're on the eve of national destruction. It'll be fun to watch Trump
the Destroyer.

So when are you forfeiting your U.S. citizenship for the Antarctic?

Russian hacking?
 

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 22:05:49 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:

When does an assessment become fact?

When evidence is presented.

Russian hacking?
 

On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 07:09:47 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/16/16 11:49 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:00:07 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:


Is this the same corrupt FBI that you were bitching about a month ago?

Again, when is reporting the truth disruptive to anyone but the liar?
Perhaps the DNC's lies and dirty dealing was disrupted but those dirty
tricks were the act that tried to influence the election.



I haven't read where everything the FBI, CIA and other intelligence
gathering agencies has been revealed. Apparently you have in the double
secret stuff Kellyanne Conway must be sending you, eh?

WTF are you talking about?
We were discussing the allegation that the russians leaked actual
emails the DNC was sending back and forth.
When is telling the truth about back room dealing a bad thing, no
matter who does it?
As I have said many times, If the Washington Post was behind this,
they would want a Pulitzer.

Russian hacking?
 

On 12/17/16 10:58 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 07:09:47 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/16/16 11:49 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:00:07 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:


Is this the same corrupt FBI that you were bitching about a month ago?

Again, when is reporting the truth disruptive to anyone but the liar?
Perhaps the DNC's lies and dirty dealing was disrupted but those dirty
tricks were the act that tried to influence the election.



I haven't read where everything the FBI, CIA and other intelligence
gathering agencies has been revealed. Apparently you have in the double
secret stuff Kellyanne Conway must be sending you, eh?

WTF are you talking about?
We were discussing the allegation that the russians leaked actual
emails the DNC was sending back and forth.
When is telling the truth about back room dealing a bad thing, no
matter who does it?
As I have said many times, If the Washington Post was behind this,
they would want a Pulitzer.


Oh. You think just emails were involved. I get it.

Russian hacking?
 

On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 10:58:10 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Most of the voters preferred Clinton. About 3,000,000 more.
Unfortunately, we are saddled with an Electoral College system that is
still a payback for the founders allowing slavery to exist.

Even Biden admits, Hillary lost the election because she did not
connect with anyone outside of the big cities.
The EC exists so those people have a voice. Otherwise we would still
be in the olde english feudal system where the people in the castle
control all of the serfs outside. It had little to do with slavery.
Just like today, the rest of the country did not want to be ruled by
New York and Boston.

Russian hacking?
 

On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 11:03:38 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/17/16 10:58 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 07:09:47 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/16/16 11:49 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:00:07 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:


Is this the same corrupt FBI that you were bitching about a month ago?

Again, when is reporting the truth disruptive to anyone but the liar?
Perhaps the DNC's lies and dirty dealing was disrupted but those dirty
tricks were the act that tried to influence the election.



I haven't read where everything the FBI, CIA and other intelligence
gathering agencies has been revealed. Apparently you have in the double
secret stuff Kellyanne Conway must be sending you, eh?

WTF are you talking about?
We were discussing the allegation that the russians leaked actual
emails the DNC was sending back and forth.
When is telling the truth about back room dealing a bad thing, no
matter who does it?
As I have said many times, If the Washington Post was behind this,
they would want a Pulitzer.


Oh. You think just emails were involved. I get it.

What do you think was involved?
It certainly was not any advanced spycraft or anything. They got into
an unprotected server and read some Email. This is not Stuxnet. There
are 15 year olds who can do what is alleged here. If it was a state
actor, they would be sophisticated enough to leave footprints pointing
somewhere else. Your buddy Netanyahu has far more to gain from Trump
winning than Putin.

Russian hacking?
 

On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 11:26:06 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

You notice the words "big-time shootin war" and "your...kids...becoming
draft-eligible..."?
Try again.

All kids are "draft eligible" and have been since the founding of the
country. It is just a lack of need that prevents them from going.
If you don't think Afghanistan and Iraq are shootin wars, I doubt we
will ever have one again. Any war with a super power will go nuclear
long before any native soil on either side is threatened. That is why
that Princeton guy is so worried about us saber rattling the russians,
while NATO is putting an unprecedented number of troops on their
western border. It isn't really unprecedented. Hitler did it right
before Operation Barbarosa. If that blows up, we will all be nuked
long before any draftees get to boot camp.

Russian hacking?
 

9:58 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Most of the voters preferred Clinton. About 3,000,000 more.
Unfortunately, we are saddled with an Electoral College system that is
still a payback for the founders allowing slavery to exist.
......

You wouldn't think so lowly if the EC if if the candidates were reversed, would you Harry?