On 12/17/2016 11:03 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/17/16 10:58 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 07:09:47 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/16/16 11:49 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:00:07 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:


Is this the same corrupt FBI that you were bitching about a month ago?

Again, when is reporting the truth disruptive to anyone but the liar?
Perhaps the DNC's lies and dirty dealing was disrupted but those dirty
tricks were the act that tried to influence the election.



I haven't read where everything the FBI, CIA and other intelligence
gathering agencies has been revealed. Apparently you have in the double
secret stuff Kellyanne Conway must be sending you, eh?

WTF are you talking about?
We were discussing the allegation that the russians leaked actual
emails the DNC was sending back and forth.
When is telling the truth about back room dealing a bad thing, no
matter who does it?
As I have said many times, If the Washington Post was behind this,
they would want a Pulitzer.


Oh. You think just emails were involved. I get it.

What else was there Harry? Did the Russians hack into the vote counting
machines?

On 12/17/16 3:18 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/17/2016 11:03 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/17/16 10:58 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 07:09:47 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/16/16 11:49 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:00:07 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:


Is this the same corrupt FBI that you were bitching about a month ago?

Again, when is reporting the truth disruptive to anyone but the liar?
Perhaps the DNC's lies and dirty dealing was disrupted but those dirty
tricks were the act that tried to influence the election.



I haven't read where everything the FBI, CIA and other intelligence
gathering agencies has been revealed. Apparently you have in the double
secret stuff Kellyanne Conway must be sending you, eh?

WTF are you talking about?
We were discussing the allegation that the russians leaked actual
emails the DNC was sending back and forth.
When is telling the truth about back room dealing a bad thing, no
matter who does it?
As I have said many times, If the Washington Post was behind this,
they would want a Pulitzer.


Oh. You think just emails were involved. I get it.

What else was there Harry? Did the Russians hack into the vote counting
machines?



Gee, I don't know. Do you?

On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 21:21:39 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:



Heheheheh. Naivete at its pinnacle. There are ways to "hack" without an
internet connection and there is all kinds of non-voting interference
that is possible. How about deleting registrations...oh, wait, your
party does that without the help of the Russians.

I am still waiting for the example of any if this that was not
following the law.
If someone registered so they could vote for Carter and never showed
up at the polls or re registered since, they should delete the
registration.
It cuts down on the "dead" vote but I understand that is a major
democrat voter base.

On 12/18/16 1:14 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 21:21:39 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:



Heheheheh. Naivete at its pinnacle. There are ways to "hack" without an
internet connection and there is all kinds of non-voting interference
that is possible. How about deleting registrations...oh, wait, your
party does that without the help of the Russians.

I am still waiting for the example of any if this that was not
following the law.
If someone registered so they could vote for Carter and never showed
up at the polls or re registered since, they should delete the
registration.
It cuts down on the "dead" vote but I understand that is a major
democrat voter base.


Following the law...oh, yeah, when the Republicans in the governor's
chair and the legislature pass laws to make it harder for legitimate
voters to register or vote. Here's another example of Republicans
interfering with the will of the voters...the shenanigans the outgoing
governor and legislature in North Carolina just went through to negate
the impact of the election that turned out the governor, the gay-hating
governor who is now going to work for Trumplethinskin.

On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 08:32:24 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/18/16 1:14 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 21:21:39 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:



Heheheheh. Naivete at its pinnacle. There are ways to "hack" without an
internet connection and there is all kinds of non-voting interference
that is possible. How about deleting registrations...oh, wait, your
party does that without the help of the Russians.

I am still waiting for the example of any if this that was not
following the law.
If someone registered so they could vote for Carter and never showed
up at the polls or re registered since, they should delete the
registration.
It cuts down on the "dead" vote but I understand that is a major
democrat voter base.


Following the law...oh, yeah, when the Republicans in the governor's
chair and the legislature pass laws to make it harder for legitimate
voters to register or vote. Here's another example of Republicans
interfering with the will of the voters...the shenanigans the outgoing
governor and legislature in North Carolina just went through to negate
the impact of the election that turned out the governor, the gay-hating
governor who is now going to work for Trumplethinskin.

Nice bit of hyperbole but it is certainly not true in my state.

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/18/16 1:14 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 21:21:39 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:



Heheheheh. Naivete at its pinnacle. There are ways to "hack" without an
internet connection and there is all kinds of non-voting interference
that is possible. How about deleting registrations...oh, wait, your
party does that without the help of the Russians.

I am still waiting for the example of any if this that was not
following the law.
If someone registered so they could vote for Carter and never showed
up at the polls or re registered since, they should delete the
registration.
It cuts down on the "dead" vote but I understand that is a major
democrat voter base.


Following the law...oh, yeah, when the Republicans in the governor's
chair and the legislature pass laws to make it harder for legitimate
voters to register or vote. Here's another example of Republicans
interfering with the will of the voters...the shenanigans the outgoing
governor and legislature in North Carolina just went through to negate
the impact of the election that turned out the governor, the gay-hating
governor who is now going to work for Trumplethinskin.


Actually how to skirt the law is a better reflection.

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/18/16 1:14 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 21:21:39 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:



Heheheheh. Naivete at its pinnacle. There are ways to "hack" without an
internet connection and there is all kinds of non-voting interference
that is possible. How about deleting registrations...oh, wait, your
party does that without the help of the Russians.

I am still waiting for the example of any if this that was not
following the law.
If someone registered so they could vote for Carter and never showed
up at the polls or re registered since, they should delete the
registration.
It cuts down on the "dead" vote but I understand that is a major
democrat voter base.


Following the law...oh, yeah, when the Republicans in the governor's
chair and the legislature pass laws to make it harder for legitimate
voters to register or vote. Here's another example of Republicans
interfering with the will of the voters...the shenanigans the outgoing
governor and legislature in North Carolina just went through to negate
the impact of the election that turned out the governor, the gay-hating
governor who is now going to work for Trumplethinskin.


What is wrong on deleting a non voter. If you do not vote in the General
Election in California you get dropped from the voter registration.

On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 11:04:03 -0600, Califbill
wrote:

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/18/16 1:14 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 21:21:39 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:



Heheheheh. Naivete at its pinnacle. There are ways to "hack" without an
internet connection and there is all kinds of non-voting interference
that is possible. How about deleting registrations...oh, wait, your
party does that without the help of the Russians.

I am still waiting for the example of any if this that was not
following the law.
If someone registered so they could vote for Carter and never showed
up at the polls or re registered since, they should delete the
registration.
It cuts down on the "dead" vote but I understand that is a major
democrat voter base.


Following the law...oh, yeah, when the Republicans in the governor's
chair and the legislature pass laws to make it harder for legitimate
voters to register or vote. Here's another example of Republicans
interfering with the will of the voters...the shenanigans the outgoing
governor and legislature in North Carolina just went through to negate
the impact of the election that turned out the governor, the gay-hating
governor who is now going to work for Trumplethinskin.


What is wrong on deleting a non voter. If you do not vote in the General
Election in California you get dropped from the voter registration.

In Florida you have to stay away from the polls for something like 6
years and ignore the mailed warnings.
Any response at all will automatically renew you.
I could still vote my mother's ballot if I wanted to be a crook but I
threw away the renewal warning.