True North wrote:
Keyser Söze
- hide quoted text -
On 6/22/16 8:20 PM, Alex wrote:
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill dribbles...

"You do live in a high crime city."


Say what!
By 'merican standards I live in the Garden of Eden. Especially when
compared to San Francisco and Oakland.
Odd choices but both are run by Democrats so you make a valid point.

"That's just...stupid."


That's our Ditzy...never disappoints!

After you hit send on a post like this do you email your mentor and ask
"Did I do good Harry?"?

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/23/16 8:09 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 6/22/16 11:06 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:17:43 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

A case of paranoia there. Pretty common among gun nuts.

Do you carry a spare tire in your car? Is that paranoia too?



How many flat tires/blow-outs have you had in your driving life?

Since the steel belted radial tire? A couple. Considering I was
driving 50,000 miles a year, it was a very rare to almost non-existent
event in the last 45 years, yet I still carried a spare, a jack and a
decent lug wrench. I guess I was paranoid about that too.
The EPA says that every extra 100 pounds you add to a car reduces
efficiency 1-2% so it is safe to say the 50 pounds or so you have with
the "doughnut" tire, jack and such costs you about 1% so it is not
unreasonable to say you wasted 25 gallons of gas a year, just on your
paranoia. (assuming the tire and jack were free)

At a certain point my $350 Ruger and a few boxes of ammo are a
bargain. ;-)



That's the whole point. You carry a spare tire because you need to,
because you've had a couple of flats or blowouts over the years. It
isn't paranoia to carry a spare and a jack.

How many times have you *had* to use a firearm to defend yourself over
the same period of time?


Tell us about the times you were sitting down to lunch with your
associates and out of nowhere other mobsters opened fire on them.
We're you packing heat at the time? If not why not? Didn't that
happen on more than one occasion?


There were no such times. Once, in Central America, I was with a group
of associates who were pushing for land reform when some members of
the national army opened fire on several of our group who were sitting
at an adjacent table. The attackers weren't mobsters, unless you think
military officers are mobsters.



Was that with Brian Williams or Hillary Clinton?

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:26:10 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:54:52 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:25:25 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/23/16 9:49 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:29:33 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

How many times have you *had* to use a firearm to defend yourself over
the same period of time?

A couple.


Oh, well. Go for it.

You seem to be fairly well armed and you have made no secret of the
fact that you would use deadly force if it was necessary so you do not
really have a stand here.

BAO trusts the police to respond before anything bad can happen to
him. I hope he is right but they usually just show up in time to take
a report and, maybe, call the coroner. The number of these crimes that
are actually closed is frighteningly small.

**** happens. Disease. Falls. Car accidents. Murder isn't even on my
"fear" list. I won't tell you how to be cautious.

It is not an over riding concern with me either. Your objection seemed
to be that I actually trained with my firearm and I would think that
was a good thing. You lefties bitch about irresponsible gun owners,
then you bitch when someone tries to be responsible. You can see why
we think you are just against my right to own a gun.
You just can't say that and still get people to vote for your
candidates or the idea of "reasonable" gun control. We know what your
objective is. I suggest you just move to UK ... or Massachusetts.

There's that paranoia again. "Lefties," "against my right to own a
gun," "We know what your objective is."
Hey, I've got no problem with you playing cops and robbers, or cowboys
and Indians. Everybody's got their fetishes.
At the moment, mine is Lucky Country black licorice. Traditional.

If you do not object, then why all the vitriol?
Is it just a problem that you can't be civil.

So much for the "liberal" personality.

Now I'm a "liberal." There was no vitriol. You're too sensitive.
I've never expressed any objection to how you live your life.

Wrote in message:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:54:52 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:25:25 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/23/16 9:49 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:29:33 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

How many times have you *had* to use a firearm to defend yourself over
the same period of time?

A couple.


Oh, well. Go for it.

You seem to be fairly well armed and you have made no secret of the
fact that you would use deadly force if it was necessary so you do not
really have a stand here.

BAO trusts the police to respond before anything bad can happen to
him. I hope he is right but they usually just show up in time to take
a report and, maybe, call the coroner. The number of these crimes that
are actually closed is frighteningly small.

**** happens. Disease. Falls. Car accidents. Murder isn't even on my
"fear" list. I won't tell you how to be cautious.

It is not an over riding concern with me either. Your objection seemed
to be that I actually trained with my firearm and I would think that
was a good thing. You lefties bitch about irresponsible gun owners,etc and only cehanc
then you bitch when someone tries to be responsible. You can see why
we think you are just against my right to own a gun.
You just can't say that and still get people to vote for your
candidates or the idea of "reasonable" gun control. We know what your
objective is. I suggest you just move to UK ... or Massachusetts.





In Mass, he could be a junior speech writer for Lizzy Warren. That
might be his only chance to finally make a name for himself in
politics. I' m sure the pay is crap though. He wouldn't be able
to put a dent in the debt he owes society.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:57:13 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:26:10 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:54:52 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:25:25 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/23/16 9:49 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:29:33 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

How many times have you *had* to use a firearm to defend yourself over
the same period of time?

A couple.


Oh, well. Go for it.

You seem to be fairly well armed and you have made no secret of the
fact that you would use deadly force if it was necessary so you do not
really have a stand here.

BAO trusts the police to respond before anything bad can happen to
him. I hope he is right but they usually just show up in time to take
a report and, maybe, call the coroner. The number of these crimes that
are actually closed is frighteningly small.

**** happens. Disease. Falls. Car accidents. Murder isn't even on my
"fear" list. I won't tell you how to be cautious.

It is not an over riding concern with me either. Your objection seemed
to be that I actually trained with my firearm and I would think that
was a good thing. You lefties bitch about irresponsible gun owners,
then you bitch when someone tries to be responsible. You can see why
we think you are just against my right to own a gun.
You just can't say that and still get people to vote for your
candidates or the idea of "reasonable" gun control. We know what your
objective is. I suggest you just move to UK ... or Massachusetts.

There's that paranoia again. "Lefties," "against my right to own a
gun," "We know what your objective is."
Hey, I've got no problem with you playing cops and robbers, or cowboys
and Indians. Everybody's got their fetishes.
At the moment, mine is Lucky Country black licorice. Traditional.

If you do not object, then why all the vitriol?
Is it just a problem that you can't be civil.

So much for the "liberal" personality.

Now I'm a "liberal." There was no vitriol. You're too sensitive.
I've never expressed any objection to how you live your life.

You described my attempt at due diligence as paranoia. That sounded
like an objection to me.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/23/16 2:14 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:58:30 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/23/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:25:25 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/23/16 9:49 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:29:33 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

How many times have you *had* to use a firearm to defend yourself over
the same period of time?

A couple.


Oh, well. Go for it.

You seem to be fairly well armed and you have made no secret of the
fact that you would use deadly force if it was necessary so you do not
really have a stand here.

BAO trusts the police to respond before anything bad can happen to
him. I hope he is right but they usually just show up in time to take
a report and, maybe, call the coroner. The number of these crimes that
are actually closed is frighteningly small.


Ahh, but my primary purpose in having a few firearms is to participate
in target shooting. At one point, there were two morons here who
threatened physical violence, so I "gunned up" and got a carry permit,
but those morons -the crazy guy from the Pacific Rim who lived in Canada
and nutball Scotty from Connecticut- seem to have disappeared.

If we had a home invasion here and we somehow weren't warned by the
security system, I probably could get to a sidearm or shotgun in time to
defend us. If thugs trip the property lights at night or the perimeter
alarms, there's no question I'd have time to grab a firearm. I certainly
wouldn't hesitate to fire into the center of body mass of a home
invader. My "trusty" S&W revolver would do the job, and I wouldn't need
more than six rounds.

Given what you just said, BAO would call you either paranoid or a gun nut, or both.


I'll keep you in mind the next time I want a comment from a racist.


Seems as if are the racist. Always bringing up race.

Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/23/16 2:14 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:58:30 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/23/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:25:25 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/23/16 9:49 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:29:33 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

How many times have you *had* to use a firearm to defend yourself over
the same period of time?

A couple.


Oh, well. Go for it.

You seem to be fairly well armed and you have made no secret of the
fact that you would use deadly force if it was necessary so you do not
really have a stand here.

BAO trusts the police to respond before anything bad can happen to
him. I hope he is right but they usually just show up in time to take
a report and, maybe, call the coroner. The number of these crimes that
are actually closed is frighteningly small.


Ahh, but my primary purpose in having a few firearms is to participate
in target shooting. At one point, there were two morons here who
threatened physical violence, so I "gunned up" and got a carry permit,
but those morons -the crazy guy from the Pacific Rim who lived in Canada
and nutball Scotty from Connecticut- seem to have disappeared.

If we had a home invasion here and we somehow weren't warned by the
security system, I probably could get to a sidearm or shotgun in time to
defend us. If thugs trip the property lights at night or the perimeter
alarms, there's no question I'd have time to grab a firearm. I certainly
wouldn't hesitate to fire into the center of body mass of a home
invader. My "trusty" S&W revolver would do the job, and I wouldn't need
more than six rounds.

Given what you just said, BAO would call you either paranoid or a gun nut, or both.


I'll keep you in mind the next time I want a comment from a racist.


Seems as if are the racist. Always bringing up race.



That's an incredibly ignorant statement .

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Keyser Söze wrote:
Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/23/16 2:14 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:58:30 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/23/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:25:25 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/23/16 9:49 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:29:33 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

How many times have you *had* to use a firearm to defend yourself over
the same period of time?

A couple.


Oh, well. Go for it.

You seem to be fairly well armed and you have made no secret of the
fact that you would use deadly force if it was necessary so you do not
really have a stand here.

BAO trusts the police to respond before anything bad can happen to
him. I hope he is right but they usually just show up in time to take
a report and, maybe, call the coroner. The number of these crimes that
are actually closed is frighteningly small.


Ahh, but my primary purpose in having a few firearms is to participate
in target shooting. At one point, there were two morons here who
threatened physical violence, so I "gunned up" and got a carry permit,
but those morons -the crazy guy from the Pacific Rim who lived in Canada
and nutball Scotty from Connecticut- seem to have disappeared.

If we had a home invasion here and we somehow weren't warned by the
security system, I probably could get to a sidearm or shotgun in time to
defend us. If thugs trip the property lights at night or the perimeter
alarms, there's no question I'd have time to grab a firearm. I certainly
wouldn't hesitate to fire into the center of body mass of a home
invader. My "trusty" S&W revolver would do the job, and I wouldn't need
more than six rounds.

Given what you just said, BAO would call you either paranoid or a gun nut, or both.


I'll keep you in mind the next time I want a comment from a racist.


Seems as if are the racist. Always bringing up race.



That's an incredibly ignorant statement .


Other than the dropped you, it is very true. Nothing ignorant about it.

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:20:27 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:57:13 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:26:10 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:54:52 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:25:25 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/23/16 9:49 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:29:33 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

How many times have you *had* to use a firearm to defend yourself over
the same period of time?

A couple.


Oh, well. Go for it.

You seem to be fairly well armed and you have made no secret of the
fact that you would use deadly force if it was necessary so you do not
really have a stand here.

BAO trusts the police to respond before anything bad can happen to
him. I hope he is right but they usually just show up in time to take
a report and, maybe, call the coroner. The number of these crimes that
are actually closed is frighteningly small.

**** happens. Disease. Falls. Car accidents. Murder isn't even on my
"fear" list. I won't tell you how to be cautious.

It is not an over riding concern with me either. Your objection seemed
to be that I actually trained with my firearm and I would think that
was a good thing. You lefties bitch about irresponsible gun owners,
then you bitch when someone tries to be responsible. You can see why
we think you are just against my right to own a gun.
You just can't say that and still get people to vote for your
candidates or the idea of "reasonable" gun control. We know what your
objective is. I suggest you just move to UK ... or Massachusetts.

There's that paranoia again. "Lefties," "against my right to own a
gun," "We know what your objective is."
Hey, I've got no problem with you playing cops and robbers, or cowboys
and Indians. Everybody's got their fetishes.
At the moment, mine is Lucky Country black licorice. Traditional.

If you do not object, then why all the vitriol?
Is it just a problem that you can't be civil.

So much for the "liberal" personality.

Now I'm a "liberal." There was no vitriol. You're too sensitive.
I've never expressed any objection to how you live your life.

You described my attempt at due diligence as paranoia. That sounded
like an objection to me.

Perhaps he's simply an overly sensitive psychoanalyst.

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 22:46:48 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/23/16 2:14 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:58:30 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/23/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:25:25 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/23/16 9:49 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:29:33 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

How many times have you *had* to use a firearm to defend yourself over
the same period of time?

A couple.


Oh, well. Go for it.

You seem to be fairly well armed and you have made no secret of the
fact that you would use deadly force if it was necessary so you do not
really have a stand here.

BAO trusts the police to respond before anything bad can happen to
him. I hope he is right but they usually just show up in time to take
a report and, maybe, call the coroner. The number of these crimes that
are actually closed is frighteningly small.


Ahh, but my primary purpose in having a few firearms is to participate
in target shooting. At one point, there were two morons here who
threatened physical violence, so I "gunned up" and got a carry permit,
but those morons -the crazy guy from the Pacific Rim who lived in Canada
and nutball Scotty from Connecticut- seem to have disappeared.

If we had a home invasion here and we somehow weren't warned by the
security system, I probably could get to a sidearm or shotgun in time to
defend us. If thugs trip the property lights at night or the perimeter
alarms, there's no question I'd have time to grab a firearm. I certainly
wouldn't hesitate to fire into the center of body mass of a home
invader. My "trusty" S&W revolver would do the job, and I wouldn't need
more than six rounds.

Given what you just said, BAO would call you either paranoid or a gun nut, or both.


I'll keep you in mind the next time I want a comment from a racist.


Seems as if are the racist. Always bringing up race.



That's an incredibly ignorant statement .

You keep making disparaging comments about the accurate statements of others.

Could *you* be the maker of the 'incredibly ignorant' statements.

You have been caught in so many lies, your only source of deflection is name-calling. I suppose
name-calling is a bit more honorable than telling lies, but not much.