On 6/17/16 2:38 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/17/16 1:14 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
...polls...

General Election: Trump vs. Clinton

Rasmussen Reports
Clinton 44, Trump 39

Reuters/Ipsos
Clinton 41, Trump 32

Reuters/Ipsos
Clinton 39, Trump 29, Johnson 6, Stein 4

Virginia: Trump vs. Clinton
PPP (D)
Clinton 48, Trump 45


Not great margins. Maybe another Dewey wins. And Johnson gets enough to
toss it to Congress. Who are the Veeps. When Hillary is impeached, will
be very important.



Uh-huh. Perhaps you should contribute to Zell's latest campaign and then
go back on the roof.


More bull**** responses. Maybe you need to get out of the basement, get
some sunshine, vitamin D, and brain food.



Not great margins, eh?

In 2000, G.W. Bush won 1.5% more of the popular vote than his opponent.
In 2004, the margin was 2%
In 2008, 7%
In 2012, 4%

In the national polls I referenced, albeit only a snapshot of a moment
caught in time, Clinton has leads of 5 points, 9 points, 10 points.

Perhaps in matters political, you should consider only commenting where
you have some sort of knowledge base

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/17/16 2:38 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/17/16 1:14 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
...polls...

General Election: Trump vs. Clinton

Rasmussen Reports
Clinton 44, Trump 39

Reuters/Ipsos
Clinton 41, Trump 32

Reuters/Ipsos
Clinton 39, Trump 29, Johnson 6, Stein 4

Virginia: Trump vs. Clinton
PPP (D)
Clinton 48, Trump 45


Not great margins. Maybe another Dewey wins. And Johnson gets enough to
toss it to Congress. Who are the Veeps. When Hillary is impeached, will
be very important.



Uh-huh. Perhaps you should contribute to Zell's latest campaign and then
go back on the roof.


More bull**** responses. Maybe you need to get out of the basement, get
some sunshine, vitamin D, and brain food.



Not great margins, eh?

In 2000, G.W. Bush won 1.5% more of the popular vote than his opponent.
In 2004, the margin was 2%
In 2008, 7%
In 2012, 4%

In the national polls I referenced, albeit only a snapshot of a moment
caught in time, Clinton has leads of 5 points, 9 points, 10 points.

Perhaps in matters political, you should consider only commenting where
you have some sort of knowledge base


These are polls.

On 6/17/16 4:13 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/17/16 2:38 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/17/16 1:14 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
...polls...

General Election: Trump vs. Clinton

Rasmussen Reports
Clinton 44, Trump 39

Reuters/Ipsos
Clinton 41, Trump 32

Reuters/Ipsos
Clinton 39, Trump 29, Johnson 6, Stein 4

Virginia: Trump vs. Clinton
PPP (D)
Clinton 48, Trump 45


Not great margins. Maybe another Dewey wins. And Johnson gets enough to
toss it to Congress. Who are the Veeps. When Hillary is impeached, will
be very important.



Uh-huh. Perhaps you should contribute to Zell's latest campaign and then
go back on the roof.


More bull**** responses. Maybe you need to get out of the basement, get
some sunshine, vitamin D, and brain food.



Not great margins, eh?

In 2000, G.W. Bush won 1.5% more of the popular vote than his opponent.
In 2004, the margin was 2%
In 2008, 7%
In 2012, 4%

In the national polls I referenced, albeit only a snapshot of a moment
caught in time, Clinton has leads of 5 points, 9 points, 10 points.

Perhaps in matters political, you should consider only commenting where
you have some sort of knowledge base


These are polls.



That's what we have at the moment, Bilious.

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:58:02 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Not great margins, eh?

In 2000, G.W. Bush won 1.5% more of the popular vote than his opponent.
In 2004, the margin was 2%
In 2008, 7%
In 2012, 4%

Elections are always closer than polls and the polls do not even pick
the right person, this far out

I think we are going to see some bombshells from both sides this
summer. These are the two most severely flawed candidates in the
history of the republic and the nasty stuff has not even started yet.
More than half the country hates both of them.

On 6/17/16 4:24 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:58:02 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Not great margins, eh?

In 2000, G.W. Bush won 1.5% more of the popular vote than his opponent.
In 2004, the margin was 2%
In 2008, 7%
In 2012, 4%

Elections are always closer than polls and the polls do not even pick
the right person, this far out

I think we are going to see some bombshells from both sides this
summer. These are the two most severely flawed candidates in the
history of the republic and the nasty stuff has not even started yet.
More than half the country hates both of them.


I know you are hopeful, but...the Loonytarians ain't gonna win even one
state's EC votes.

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:31:20 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/17/16 4:24 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:58:02 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Not great margins, eh?

In 2000, G.W. Bush won 1.5% more of the popular vote than his opponent.
In 2004, the margin was 2%
In 2008, 7%
In 2012, 4%

Elections are always closer than polls and the polls do not even pick
the right person, this far out

I think we are going to see some bombshells from both sides this
summer. These are the two most severely flawed candidates in the
history of the republic and the nasty stuff has not even started yet.
More than half the country hates both of them.


I know you are hopeful, but...the Loonytarians ain't gonna win even one
state's EC votes.

This might be their year but no matter what, I will wake up on
wednesday with a clear conscience.

On 6/17/16 4:24 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:58:02 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Not great margins, eh?

In 2000, G.W. Bush won 1.5% more of the popular vote than his opponent.
In 2004, the margin was 2%
In 2008, 7%
In 2012, 4%

Elections are always closer than polls and the polls do not even pick
the right person, this far out

I think we are going to see some bombshells from both sides this
summer. These are the two most severely flawed candidates in the
history of the republic and the nasty stuff has not even started yet.
More than half the country hates both of them.


Maybe the odds are close to even that when Trump loses, he'll jump off
Trump Towers. Hopefully.

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:32:56 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/17/16 4:24 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:58:02 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Not great margins, eh?

In 2000, G.W. Bush won 1.5% more of the popular vote than his opponent.
In 2004, the margin was 2%
In 2008, 7%
In 2012, 4%

Elections are always closer than polls and the polls do not even pick
the right person, this far out

I think we are going to see some bombshells from both sides this
summer. These are the two most severely flawed candidates in the
history of the republic and the nasty stuff has not even started yet.
More than half the country hates both of them.


Maybe the odds are close to even that when Trump loses, he'll jump off
Trump Towers. Hopefully.

I might buy the PPV.