![]() |
Attention, John Herring
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 11:59:42 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 6/19/16 10:49 AM, wrote: It is funny that your guns are supposed to inspire awe in all of us but everyone else's are ****. You seem to be here bragging about your most recent purchase every few months BTW I always wondered how well the prices held up on those gold inlaid commemorative specials you see in the NRA magazine. They tend to be about $1500 more than the stock gun. There is a Thompson there this month for $3100, vs a new one from AO for $1500 + $300 for the drum) I assume it is like Harry's Elvis plates I had no idea my small assortment of firearms was supposed to "inspire awe" in anyone, let along the rocket scientists here on .wrecked.bloats. I mostly buy pretty standard, run-of-the-mill firearms that I enjoy shooting. There must be a zillion Mini-14s extant, and even more S&W revolvers and lots and lots of Henry rifles in various calibers. You do wax on about these "run of the mill" guns A semi-auto Thompson submachine gun? What's the point? Dunno but I assume the premium would just be the collectability of the gold one. I was curious about why someone would want a SA Thompson, unless it was just for the uniqueness of the design. I do wish I had bought a real one when they were around for a couple grand. They are up in the "nice new car" range now (probably more than you paid for your truck). The M1s are cheaper than a real 1921 Colt "Thompson". The last time I looked you could get an M1 for $15k and the commercial ones were more like $40-45k. That is far more return that I got from my 401k. |
Attention, John Herring
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/19/16 12:49 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/19/16 12:10 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/19/16 11:45 AM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/19/16 8:07 AM, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/19/2016 7:39 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/18/16 9:01 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/18/16 6:26 AM, justan wrote: Alex Wrote in message: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 8:09 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 7:53 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 20:41:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/15/16 8:16 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/15/16 8:02 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/14/16 8:06 PM, wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:46 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again. What the **** are you doing in John's fridge? Looking for pie? Naw...the fridge is on a web cam. :) That's stupid. Did you just giggle or "LOL" when you typed that dumb remark? Stupid? I'm not the one who paid $1100 for a $200 rifle. I'll pay you $400 each for any you can get. Find 100 and I'll happily write that check for $40,000. Best investment you can make since you have a source for them at half the price. The 10/22 is a $200 or $200 and change rifle. There's nothing rare about it, even the "commemorative" model you bought, which is just a dressed up 10/22. Great deal for you then. Put up or shut up. Go get them. I already have a .22lr rifle, a CZ, that easily outshoots a 10/22. Can you get the model he bought for $200 or not? You made the comment, now put up or shut up. Notice how you change the subject. Got caught again, eh? I have no interest in an "old" new 10/22 or a "new" new 10/22 rifle. I already have a .22 rifle that shoots better. You said I overpaid for a $200 rifle and I offered to double your money on any and all you could buy for $200 and sell to me for $400. Then you STFU and ran. No surprise there. There are plenty of $200 10/22's around. Not like the one I bought. You keep ignoring that fact yet you knew it when you typed your narcissistic post. You might be giving him too much crédit. His knowledge is based on his googleability and his interpative skills, or lack thereof. ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ The one "Alex" bought is a standard 10/22 with some silly mass production dress up features that in no way make the rifle "special." But, hey, whatever floats his little boats, eh? 100 examples of a special edition firearm would hardly qualify as "mass production" yet that would make them special. Go try to buy one, Krause, I'm still offering $400 each so you can double your money. I'll cover all shipping and transfer costs, too - up to $50,000. Want to make a quick $25,000? Go get them! It's tax-free like all of your income! Yawn. Go play with your little pop gun toys, "Alex," and get back to us when you buy your next commemorative dish set, perhaps with a likeness of Elvis emblazoned on the dinner plates. Pop toys? Like the 22 caliber whatever firearm that Junior got at the age of 10. A fine weapon for a kid to learn on. Seems as if you've taken quite a liking to em. Please consider stopping your mindless drooling in here, FlaJim. We've got a full glass of it being poured in here daily by California Swill. This is the output from a Kansas University? I think their accreditation should be reviewed. As I stated, mindless drooling... As I stated. Incompetent scribing, by a claimant of a Masters in writing. Do you ever read your posts, Bilious? What is "scribing"? And when did I claim to have a "Masters in writing"? Your mind is gone and you are drooling. Poor excuse for writing by a self proclaimed "professional". Are you sure you were not a janitor with Don? What is "scribing," and when did I say I had a "Masters in writing," Bilious? You are in no position to judge anyone's writing, as you are a ****-poor writer. Looking at your writing skills, you could not judge poor writing. |
Attention, John Herring
Kalif Swill dribbles.....
"Looking at your writing skills, you could not judge poor writing." You have quite the nerve talking of someone else's writing. Most time your babbling is barely coherent. Add to that your fantasy of other posters past employment. You'd best be served by keeping your mouth shut and having us think you are a fool ...rather than opening your mouth and removing the all doubt. |
Attention, John Herring
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 07:32:48 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/18/16 6:26 AM, justan wrote: Alex Wrote in message: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 8:09 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 7:53 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 20:41:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/15/16 8:16 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/15/16 8:02 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/14/16 8:06 PM, wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:46 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again. What the **** are you doing in John's fridge? Looking for pie? Naw...the fridge is on a web cam. :) That's stupid. Did you just giggle or "LOL" when you typed that dumb remark? Stupid? I'm not the one who paid $1100 for a $200 rifle. I'll pay you $400 each for any you can get. Find 100 and I'll happily write that check for $40,000. Best investment you can make since you have a source for them at half the price. The 10/22 is a $200 or $200 and change rifle. There's nothing rare about it, even the "commemorative" model you bought, which is just a dressed up 10/22. Great deal for you then. Put up or shut up. Go get them. I already have a .22lr rifle, a CZ, that easily outshoots a 10/22. Can you get the model he bought for $200 or not? You made the comment, now put up or shut up. Notice how you change the subject. Got caught again, eh? I have no interest in an "old" new 10/22 or a "new" new 10/22 rifle. I already have a .22 rifle that shoots better. You said I overpaid for a $200 rifle and I offered to double your money on any and all you could buy for $200 and sell to me for $400. Then you STFU and ran. No surprise there. There are plenty of $200 10/22's around. Not like the one I bought. You keep ignoring that fact yet you knew it when you typed your narcissistic post. You might be giving him too much crédit. His knowledge is based on his googleability and his interpative skills, or lack thereof. ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ The one "Alex" bought is a standard 10/22 with some silly mass production dress up features that in no way make the rifle "special." But, hey, whatever floats his little boats, eh? Can you buy it for $200 as you stated? |
Attention, John Herring
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:13:07 -0500, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote: Keyser Söze - show quoted text - "The one "Alex" bought is a standard 10/22 with some silly mass production dress up features that in no way make the rifle "special." But, hey, whatever floats his little boats, eh?" Seems like Ditzy is infatuated with gaudy reproductions. What's that about " a fool and his money..."? Alex seems to still have money, unlike some. LOL!! ....and most appropriate! |
Attention, John Herring
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 12:19:53 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:
Kalif Swill dribbles..... "Looking at your writing skills, you could not judge poor writing." You have quite the nerve talking of someone else's writing. Most time your babbling is barely coherent. Add to that your fantasy of other posters past employment. You'd best be served by keeping your mouth shut and having us think you are a fool ...rather than opening your mouth and removing the all doubt. Don, do you understand the punctuation of the possessive case? And here you are putting down someone else's writing. For shame. |
Attention, John Herring
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 06:35:10 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:
Alex Wrote in message: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/17/16 7:43 AM, justan wrote: Wrote in message: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:46:37 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:21:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 12:10 PM, wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:06:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 11:52 AM, Tim wrote: 2) if you're meaning the CZ is a more accurate rifle than the 10/22 then you should reconsider. Why? The stock CZs under discussion are more accurate than the 10/22s. The issue is whether the shooter is more accurate than the gun. That's Tim's issue. Some firearms are inherently more accurate than others. You should have watched the little video I referenced.using ope About a minute into the ad, I didn't care anymore. opeThe caption says it shoots inside a 1/2 MOA but most shooters can't accomplish 10 times that without a rest and a scope. The guy was using a rest and a scope. I doubt a 10/22 could match that at 100 yards no matter what. So what? Most people do not sit at a bench with a scoped rifle trying to shoot tight groups all day, particularly with a 22 rf. Most folks would be happy if they hit what they are shooting at. There might be some advantage to hitting the target at different points. I'm happy that I can shoot offhand and hit a target the size of your belly button at 20-25 yards. You are exaggerating, I'm sure. Do ya think? I think he pokes holes in the target with a pencil, photographs same, and posts it to get pats on the back. |
Attention, John Herring
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:18:17 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:
Keyser Söze Wrote in message: You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again. You must be going senile. You used that on Herring a couple of days ago. Apparently you thought it was humorous. So sad. I suppose it was meant to mean something profound. Harry is that, you know. |
Attention, John Herring
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill dribbles..... "Looking at your writing skills, you could not judge poor writing." You have quite the nerve talking of someone else's writing. Most time your babbling is barely coherent. Add to that your fantasy of other posters past employment. You'd best be served by keeping your mouth shut and having us think you are a fool ...rather than opening your mouth and removing the all doubt. I can read. Can you? I never declared bankruptcy. Let alone twice. At Harry's age, I do not have to have employment. And can by the boat I want. And the truck to tow it. Let alone have to get a lone to buy them. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com