|
Attention, John Herring
You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again.
|
Attention, John Herring
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:46 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again. What the **** are you doing in John's fridge? Looking for pie? |
Attention, John Herring
|
Attention, John Herring
|
Attention, John Herring
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/14/16 8:06 PM, wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:46 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again. What the **** are you doing in John's fridge? Looking for pie? Naw...the fridge is on a web cam. :) That's stupid. Did you just giggle or "LOL" when you typed that dumb remark? |
Attention, John Herring
On 6/15/16 8:02 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/14/16 8:06 PM, wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:46 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again. What the **** are you doing in John's fridge? Looking for pie? Naw...the fridge is on a web cam. :) That's stupid. Did you just giggle or "LOL" when you typed that dumb remark? Stupid? I'm not the one who paid $1100 for a $200 rifle. |
Attention, John Herring
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/15/16 8:02 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/14/16 8:06 PM, wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:46 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again. What the **** are you doing in John's fridge? Looking for pie? Naw...the fridge is on a web cam. :) That's stupid. Did you just giggle or "LOL" when you typed that dumb remark? Stupid? I'm not the one who paid $1100 for a $200 rifle. I'll pay you $400 each for any you can get. Find 100 and I'll happily write that check for $40,000. Best investment you can make since you have a source for them at half the price. |
Attention, John Herring
On 6/15/16 8:16 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/15/16 8:02 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/14/16 8:06 PM, wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:46 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again. What the **** are you doing in John's fridge? Looking for pie? Naw...the fridge is on a web cam. :) That's stupid. Did you just giggle or "LOL" when you typed that dumb remark? Stupid? I'm not the one who paid $1100 for a $200 rifle. I'll pay you $400 each for any you can get. Find 100 and I'll happily write that check for $40,000. Best investment you can make since you have a source for them at half the price. The 10/22 is a $200 or $200 and change rifle. There's nothing rare about it, even the "commemorative" model you bought, which is just a dressed up 10/22. |
Attention, John Herring
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/15/16 8:16 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/15/16 8:02 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/14/16 8:06 PM, wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:46 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again. What the **** are you doing in John's fridge? Looking for pie? Naw...the fridge is on a web cam. :) That's stupid. Did you just giggle or "LOL" when you typed that dumb remark? Stupid? I'm not the one who paid $1100 for a $200 rifle. I'll pay you $400 each for any you can get. Find 100 and I'll happily write that check for $40,000. Best investment you can make since you have a source for them at half the price. The 10/22 is a $200 or $200 and change rifle. There's nothing rare about it, even the "commemorative" model you bought, which is just a dressed up 10/22. Great deal for you then. Put up or shut up. Go get them. |
Attention, John Herring
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 20:41:12 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote:
Alex wrote: Keyser Sze wrote: On 6/15/16 8:16 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Sze wrote: On 6/15/16 8:02 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Sze wrote: On 6/14/16 8:06 PM, wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:46 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again. What the **** are you doing in John's fridge? Looking for pie? Naw...the fridge is on a web cam. :) That's stupid. Did you just giggle or "LOL" when you typed that dumb remark? Stupid? I'm not the one who paid $1100 for a $200 rifle. I'll pay you $400 each for any you can get. Find 100 and I'll happily write that check for $40,000. Best investment you can make since you have a source for them at half the price. The 10/22 is a $200 or $200 and change rifle. There's nothing rare about it, even the "commemorative" model you bought, which is just a dressed up 10/22. Great deal for you then. Put up or shut up. Go get them. I already have a .22lr rifle, a CZ, that easily outshoots a 10/22. Can you get the model he bought for $200 or not? You made the comment, now put up or shut up. Notice how you change the subject. Got caught again, eh? |
Attention, John Herring
Jun 15Keyser Söze
- show quoted text - I already have a .22lr rifle, a CZ, that easily outshoots a 10/22. -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ ----- "Out shoots?" What ever that means. Lol! |
Attention, John Herring
On 6/16/16 7:53 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 20:41:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/15/16 8:16 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/15/16 8:02 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/14/16 8:06 PM, wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:46 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again. What the **** are you doing in John's fridge? Looking for pie? Naw...the fridge is on a web cam. :) That's stupid. Did you just giggle or "LOL" when you typed that dumb remark? Stupid? I'm not the one who paid $1100 for a $200 rifle. I'll pay you $400 each for any you can get. Find 100 and I'll happily write that check for $40,000. Best investment you can make since you have a source for them at half the price. The 10/22 is a $200 or $200 and change rifle. There's nothing rare about it, even the "commemorative" model you bought, which is just a dressed up 10/22. Great deal for you then. Put up or shut up. Go get them. I already have a .22lr rifle, a CZ, that easily outshoots a 10/22. Can you get the model he bought for $200 or not? You made the comment, now put up or shut up. Notice how you change the subject. Got caught again, eh? I have no interest in an "old" new 10/22 or a "new" new 10/22 rifle. I already have a .22 rifle that shoots better. |
Attention, John Herring
On 6/16/16 9:16 AM, Tim wrote:
"Out shoots?" What ever that means. Lol! Here, Tim, we’ll keep it really simple for you: out·shoot (out-sho͞ot′) tr.v. out·shot (-shŏt′), out·shoot·ing, out·shoots To shoot better than (another): a pistol that easily outshoots others in its class; a basketball player who outshot all others on the team. My CZ outshoots the 10/22. Got it? |
Attention, John Herring
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 06:16:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: "Out shoots?" What ever that means. Lol! I was curious myself. I am quite sure my Norrell conversion would shoot a whole lot faster. (1000 RPM or so.) |
Attention, John Herring
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:32:43 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: I have no interest in an "old" new 10/22 or a "new" new 10/22 rifle. I already have a .22 rifle that shoots better. I might take that bet, using my 60+ year old Remington pump. I paid $20 for it. |
Attention, John Herring
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:32:43 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I have no interest in an "old" new 10/22 or a "new" new 10/22 rifle. I already have a .22 rifle that shoots better. I might take that bet, using my 60+ year old Remington pump. I paid $20 for it. What bet? -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
Attention, John Herring
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:17:49 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:32:43 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I have no interest in an "old" new 10/22 or a "new" new 10/22 rifle. I already have a .22 rifle that shoots better. I might take that bet, using my 60+ year old Remington pump. I paid $20 for it. What bet? That you CZ wonder gun ain't all that. |
Attention, John Herring
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:17:49 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:32:43 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I have no interest in an "old" new 10/22 or a "new" new 10/22 rifle. I already have a .22 rifle that shoots better. I might take that bet, using my 60+ year old Remington pump. I paid $20 for it. What bet? That you CZ wonder gun ain't all that. Wonder gun? Where did you get that? It is a stock CZ 455 and it is more accurate than a stock 10/22. This is it: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DP3kwJADWd0 -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
Attention, John Herring
Harry, maybe you need to "got" the idea that your CZ is a single shot and a 10/22 has semi-automatic, or as Greg knows, full automatic capability. Also can take 30 to 50 round clips. Very capable of spraying a lot of lead in a single trigger pull.
What were you saying about "over shoot?" 2) if you're meaning the CZ is a more accurate rifle than the 10/22 then you should reconsider. The firearm is what it is. The accuracy ( in most cases) is in the guns operator rather than in the gun itself. Now, what again am I supposed to "got?" It's a simple question for you.,, |
Attention, John Herring
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:49:43 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:17:49 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:32:43 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I have no interest in an "old" new 10/22 or a "new" new 10/22 rifle. I already have a .22 rifle that shoots better. I might take that bet, using my 60+ year old Remington pump. I paid $20 for it. What bet? That you CZ wonder gun ain't all that. Wonder gun? Where did you get that? It is a stock CZ 455 and it is more accurate than a stock 10/22. This is it: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DP3kwJADWd0 I never made it through the movie trailer. |
Attention, John Herring
On 6/16/16 11:52 AM, Tim wrote:
2) if you're meaning the CZ is a more accurate rifle than the 10/22 then you should reconsider. Why? The stock CZs under discussion are more accurate than the 10/22s. |
Attention, John Herring
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:06:33 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 6/16/16 11:52 AM, Tim wrote: 2) if you're meaning the CZ is a more accurate rifle than the 10/22 then you should reconsider. Why? The stock CZs under discussion are more accurate than the 10/22s. The issue is whether the shooter is more accurate than the gun. |
Attention, John Herring
|
Attention, John Herring
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:21:04 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 6/16/16 12:10 PM, wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:06:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 11:52 AM, Tim wrote: 2) if you're meaning the CZ is a more accurate rifle than the 10/22 then you should reconsider. Why? The stock CZs under discussion are more accurate than the 10/22s. The issue is whether the shooter is more accurate than the gun. That's Tim's issue. Some firearms are inherently more accurate than others. You should have watched the little video I referenced. About a minute into the ad, I didn't care anymore. The caption says it shoots inside a 1/2 MOA but most shooters can't accomplish 10 times that without a rest and a scope. |
Attention, John Herring
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:21:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 12:10 PM, wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:06:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 11:52 AM, Tim wrote: 2) if you're meaning the CZ is a more accurate rifle than the 10/22 then you should reconsider. Why? The stock CZs under discussion are more accurate than the 10/22s. The issue is whether the shooter is more accurate than the gun. That's Tim's issue. Some firearms are inherently more accurate than others. You should have watched the little video I referenced.using ope About a minute into the ad, I didn't care anymore. opeThe caption says it shoots inside a 1/2 MOA but most shooters can't accomplish 10 times that without a rest and a scope. The guy was using a rest and a scope. I doubt a 10/22 could match that at 100 yards no matter what. -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
Attention, John Herring
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:46:37 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:21:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 12:10 PM, wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:06:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 11:52 AM, Tim wrote: 2) if you're meaning the CZ is a more accurate rifle than the 10/22 then you should reconsider. Why? The stock CZs under discussion are more accurate than the 10/22s. The issue is whether the shooter is more accurate than the gun. That's Tim's issue. Some firearms are inherently more accurate than others. You should have watched the little video I referenced.using ope About a minute into the ad, I didn't care anymore. opeThe caption says it shoots inside a 1/2 MOA but most shooters can't accomplish 10 times that without a rest and a scope. The guy was using a rest and a scope. I doubt a 10/22 could match that at 100 yards no matter what. So what? Most people do not sit at a bench with a scoped rifle trying to shoot tight groups all day, particularly with a 22 rf. |
Attention, John Herring
On 6/16/16 4:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:46:37 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:21:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 12:10 PM, wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:06:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 11:52 AM, Tim wrote: 2) if you're meaning the CZ is a more accurate rifle than the 10/22 then you should reconsider. Why? The stock CZs under discussion are more accurate than the 10/22s. The issue is whether the shooter is more accurate than the gun. That's Tim's issue. Some firearms are inherently more accurate than others. You should have watched the little video I referenced.using ope About a minute into the ad, I didn't care anymore. opeThe caption says it shoots inside a 1/2 MOA but most shooters can't accomplish 10 times that without a rest and a scope. The guy was using a rest and a scope. I doubt a 10/22 could match that at 100 yards no matter what. So what? Most people do not sit at a bench with a scoped rifle trying to shoot tight groups all day, particularly with a 22 rf. Accuracy was the point here. If you're not concerned with accuracy, get yourself a zip gun, eh? When I go to the 100 yard range, just about everyone there is trying to shoot tight groups with scoped rifles and pistols, and handguns with red dots. That you can get a very accurate rimfire rifle for a few hundred bucks that will do the job far better than the 10/22, which sells for pretty close to the same price, is interesting. |
Attention, John Herring
Accuracy is the point?
Ok. 10/22 bi-pod mount and big scope. Prone, Windy. Whacking an 8 in steel plate @ 250 yards. Not every hit but doing a great job of it https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vonfRKQ0TfQ |
Attention, John Herring
On 6/16/16 5:51 PM, Tim wrote:
Accuracy is the point? Ok. 10/22 bi-pod mount and big scope. Prone, Windy. Whacking an 8 in steel plate @ 250 yards. Not every hit but doing a great job of it https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vonfRKQ0TfQ Uh, that's not a stock 10/22. Shooter changed the stock, the barrel, and probably the receiver. The CZ was stock. So, your shooter turned a $200 rifle into what, a $700 rifle? Not impressed. |
Attention, John Herring
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:00:07 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: Uh, that's not a stock 10/22. Shooter changed the stock, the barrel, and probably the receiver. The receiver is the part with the serial number on it. Duh I am also not sure much but the stock was changed and that is common with 10/22s. They are sort of like ARs. You buy the part with the serial number and make whatever kind of gun you want. The 10/22 may be the best selling .22 out there over the 50 years it has been around. |
Attention, John Herring
On 6/16/16 6:56 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:00:07 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Uh, that's not a stock 10/22. Shooter changed the stock, the barrel, and probably the receiver. The receiver is the part with the serial number on it. Duh I am also not sure much but the stock was changed and that is common with 10/22s. They are sort of like ARs. You buy the part with the serial number and make whatever kind of gun you want. The 10/22 may be the best selling .22 out there over the 50 years it has been around. There are several suppliers of "third party receivers" for the 10/22. They get shipped to an FFL. Here's one: http://tinyurl.com/z3ymk7s I'm not disputing the success of the 10/22, but to make it as accurate as a CZ 455 or 452, you have to spend several times the original cost of the rifle. |
Attention, John Herring
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 19:06:35 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 6/16/16 6:56 PM, wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:00:07 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Uh, that's not a stock 10/22. Shooter changed the stock, the barrel, and probably the receiver. The receiver is the part with the serial number on it. Duh I am also not sure much but the stock was changed and that is common with 10/22s. They are sort of like ARs. You buy the part with the serial number and make whatever kind of gun you want. The 10/22 may be the best selling .22 out there over the 50 years it has been around. There are several suppliers of "third party receivers" for the 10/22. They get shipped to an FFL. Here's one: http://tinyurl.com/z3ymk7s That is a new gun. Why bother to even start with a 10/22 if you are just going to throw away the serialized part? I'm not disputing the success of the 10/22, but to make it as accurate as a CZ 455 or 452, you have to spend several times the original cost of the rifle. Most people would rather have a magazine fed semi auto if they are not shooting some kind of competition or fantasizing about it.. |
Attention, John Herring
|
Attention, John Herring
On 6/16/16 7:39 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 19:06:35 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 6:56 PM, wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:00:07 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Uh, that's not a stock 10/22. Shooter changed the stock, the barrel, and probably the receiver. The receiver is the part with the serial number on it. Duh I am also not sure much but the stock was changed and that is common with 10/22s. They are sort of like ARs. You buy the part with the serial number and make whatever kind of gun you want. The 10/22 may be the best selling .22 out there over the 50 years it has been around. There are several suppliers of "third party receivers" for the 10/22. They get shipped to an FFL. Here's one: http://tinyurl.com/z3ymk7s That is a new gun. Why bother to even start with a 10/22 if you are just going to throw away the serialized part? I'm not disputing the success of the 10/22, but to make it as accurate as a CZ 455 or 452, you have to spend several times the original cost of the rifle. Most people would rather have a magazine fed semi auto if they are not shooting some kind of competition or fantasizing about it.. It's a hobby. I had a nice mag-fed semi-auto 22LR rifle a few years ago. I sold it. It, too, was more accurate out of the box than any of the 10/22's. My CZ .22 is bolt action, with magazines. I like cycling the bolt. |
Attention, John Herring
Keyser Söze wrote:
Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/15/16 8:16 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/15/16 8:02 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/14/16 8:06 PM, wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:46 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again. What the **** are you doing in John's fridge? Looking for pie? Naw...the fridge is on a web cam. :) That's stupid. Did you just giggle or "LOL" when you typed that dumb remark? Stupid? I'm not the one who paid $1100 for a $200 rifle. I'll pay you $400 each for any you can get. Find 100 and I'll happily write that check for $40,000. Best investment you can make since you have a source for them at half the price. The 10/22 is a $200 or $200 and change rifle. There's nothing rare about it, even the "commemorative" model you bought, which is just a dressed up 10/22. Great deal for you then. Put up or shut up. Go get them. I already have a .22lr rifle, a CZ, that easily outshoots a 10/22. Good for you! And it's nothing special, not a limited edition, and a depreciating asset. My last 10/22 is worth far more and won't lose value. |
Attention, John Herring
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 20:41:12 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: Alex wrote: Keyser Sze wrote: On 6/15/16 8:16 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Sze wrote: On 6/15/16 8:02 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Sze wrote: On 6/14/16 8:06 PM, wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:46 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again. What the **** are you doing in John's fridge? Looking for pie? Naw...the fridge is on a web cam. :) That's stupid. Did you just giggle or "LOL" when you typed that dumb remark? Stupid? I'm not the one who paid $1100 for a $200 rifle. I'll pay you $400 each for any you can get. Find 100 and I'll happily write that check for $40,000. Best investment you can make since you have a source for them at half the price. The 10/22 is a $200 or $200 and change rifle. There's nothing rare about it, even the "commemorative" model you bought, which is just a dressed up 10/22. Great deal for you then. Put up or shut up. Go get them. I already have a .22lr rifle, a CZ, that easily outshoots a 10/22. Can you get the model he bought for $200 or not? You made the comment, now put up or shut up. Notice how you change the subject. Got caught again, eh? Deflection is his MO. It's all the old man has. |
Attention, John Herring
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/16/16 7:53 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 20:41:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/15/16 8:16 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/15/16 8:02 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/14/16 8:06 PM, wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:46 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again. What the **** are you doing in John's fridge? Looking for pie? Naw...the fridge is on a web cam. :) That's stupid. Did you just giggle or "LOL" when you typed that dumb remark? Stupid? I'm not the one who paid $1100 for a $200 rifle. I'll pay you $400 each for any you can get. Find 100 and I'll happily write that check for $40,000. Best investment you can make since you have a source for them at half the price. The 10/22 is a $200 or $200 and change rifle. There's nothing rare about it, even the "commemorative" model you bought, which is just a dressed up 10/22. Great deal for you then. Put up or shut up. Go get them. I already have a .22lr rifle, a CZ, that easily outshoots a 10/22. Can you get the model he bought for $200 or not? You made the comment, now put up or shut up. Notice how you change the subject. Got caught again, eh? I have no interest in an "old" new 10/22 or a "new" new 10/22 rifle. I already have a .22 rifle that shoots better. You said I overpaid for a $200 rifle and I offered to double your money on any and all you could buy for $200 and sell to me for $400. Then you STFU and ran. No surprise there. |
Attention, John Herring
Keyser Söze wrote:
wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:17:49 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:32:43 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I have no interest in an "old" new 10/22 or a "new" new 10/22 rifle. I already have a .22 rifle that shoots better. I might take that bet, using my 60+ year old Remington pump. I paid $20 for it. What bet? That you CZ wonder gun ain't all that. Wonder gun? Where did you get that? It is a stock CZ 455 and it is more accurate than a stock 10/22. This is it: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DP3kwJADWd0 A bolt action vs a semi-auto is never a fair comparison. You should know that. |
Attention, John Herring
On 6/16/16 7:39 PM, Tim wrote:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ex8dSp_DJQA Ok. Box stock 10/22 with a 3x Bushnel Hits at 500 yd. Show me the vid of the stock 10/22 shooting a 1/2" group at 100 yards, something the CZ's can do. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com