Attention, John Herring
 

On Sunday, June 19, 2016 at 6:40:57 PM UTC-3, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill dribbles.....

"Looking at your writing skills, you could not judge poor writing."


You have quite the nerve talking of someone else's writing. Most time
your babbling is barely coherent.
Add to that your fantasy of other posters past employment.
You'd best be served by keeping your mouth shut and having us think you
are a fool ...rather than opening your mouth and removing the all doubt.


I can read. Can you? I never declared bankruptcy. Let alone twice. At
Harry's age, I do not have to have employment. And can by the boat I want.
And the truck to tow it. Let alone have to get a lone to buy them.


Say what??
I could "by" the boat I wanted too...but would then have to join a boat club to store it...doubling my costs.
How do you "get a lone to buy them"...and what does that even mean??

Attention, John Herring
 

On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 14:06:49 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/19/16 1:05 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 11:59:42 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/19/16 10:49 AM, wrote:

It is funny that your guns are supposed to inspire awe in all of us
but everyone else's are ****.
You seem to be here bragging about your most recent purchase every few
months

BTW I always wondered how well the prices held up on those gold inlaid
commemorative specials you see in the NRA magazine. They tend to be
about $1500 more than the stock gun. There is a Thompson there this
month for $3100, vs a new one from AO for $1500 + $300 for the drum)
I assume it is like Harry's Elvis plates


I had no idea my small assortment of firearms was supposed to "inspire
awe" in anyone, let along the rocket scientists here on .wrecked.bloats.
I mostly buy pretty standard, run-of-the-mill firearms that I enjoy
shooting. There must be a zillion Mini-14s extant, and even more S&W
revolvers and lots and lots of Henry rifles in various calibers.

You do wax on about these "run of the mill" guns

Some run of the mill guns are better than other run of the mill guns.


I agree.
My 97 Winchester will still be shooting even if the shells are swollen
and I can restrike a misfire.
Hard to beat my $100 Woodsman Target.
No problems with my Daly

Attention, John Herring
 

On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 16:59:11 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 06:35:10 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Alex Wrote in message:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/17/16 7:43 AM, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:46:37 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:21:04 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/16/16 12:10 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:06:33 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/16/16 11:52 AM, Tim wrote:


2) if you're meaning the CZ is a more accurate rifle than the
10/22
then you should reconsider.


Why? The stock CZs under discussion are more accurate than the
10/22s.

The issue is whether the shooter is more accurate than the gun.


That's Tim's issue. Some firearms are inherently more accurate than
others. You should have watched the little video I referenced.using
ope
About a minute into the ad, I didn't care anymore.
opeThe caption says it shoots inside a 1/2 MOA but most shooters
can't
accomplish 10 times that without a rest and a scope.


The guy was using a rest and a scope. I doubt a 10/22 could match
that at
100 yards no matter what.

So what?
Most people do not sit at a bench with a scoped rifle trying to shoot
tight groups all day, particularly with a 22 rf.




Most folks would be happy if they hit what they are shooting at.
There might be some advantage to hitting the target at different
points.



I'm happy that I can shoot offhand and hit a target the size of your
belly button at 20-25 yards.

You are exaggerating, I'm sure.


Do ya think?

I think he pokes holes in the target with a pencil, photographs same, and posts it to get pats on
the back.

===

I have no doubt he could hit a target that size. The question is how
many rounds would he need to fire, and whether or not he'd need to
reload before succeeding.

Attention, John Herring
 

True North wrote:
On Sunday, June 19, 2016 at 6:40:57 PM UTC-3, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill dribbles.....

"Looking at your writing skills, you could not judge poor writing."


You have quite the nerve talking of someone else's writing. Most time
your babbling is barely coherent.
Add to that your fantasy of other posters past employment.
You'd best be served by keeping your mouth shut and having us think you
are a fool ...rather than opening your mouth and removing the all doubt.


I can read. Can you? I never declared bankruptcy. Let alone twice. At
Harry's age, I do not have to have employment. And can by the boat I want.
And the truck to tow it. Let alone have to get a lone to buy them.


Say what??
I could "by" the boat I wanted too...but would then have to join a boat
club to store it...doubling my costs.
How do you "get a lone to buy them"...and what does that even mean??


You have little pension. You buy a boat that serves your purpose somewhat.
But you could pay monthly storage on the trailer for a bigger boat.
Loan/loan spell check. If you need a loan, you go to a financial
institution. Hopefully your credit score is a lot higher than someone like
Harry's.

Attention, John Herring
 

Califbill Wrote in message:
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill dribbles.....

"Looking at your writing skills, you could not judge poor writing."


You have quite the nerve talking of someone else's writing. Most time
your babbling is barely coherent.
Add to that your fantasy of other posters past employment.
You'd best be served by keeping your mouth shut and having us think you
are a fool ...rather than opening your mouth and removing the all doubt.


I can read. Can you? I never declared bankruptcy. Let alone twice. At
Harry's age, I do not have to have employment. And can by the boat I want.
And the truck to tow it. Let alone have to get a lone to buy them.

the

Using Harry logic, you must have a small dick because you have the
wherewithal to pay for expensive toys.
Harry, on the other hand, claims to be a pauper with a big Dick.
Harry's small collection of small guns helps him deal with his
self esteem and machismo issues.
Harry's dad decided that Harry needed to be a gelding instead of
circumcised. Wise man, Harry's dad. Don't you think?

--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Attention, John Herring
 

True North Wrote in message:
On Sunday, June 19, 2016 at 6:40:57 PM UTC-3, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill dribbles.....

"Looking at your writing skills, you could not judge poor writing."


You have quite the nerve talking of someone else's writing. Most time
your babbling is barely coherent.
Add to that your fantasy of other posters past employment.
You'd best be served by keeping your mouth shut and having us think you
are a fool ...rather than opening your mouth and removing the all doubt.


I can read. Can you? I never declared bankruptcy. Let alone twice. At
Harry's age, I do not have to have employment. And can by the boat I want.
And the truck to tow it. Let alone have to get a lone to buy them.


Say what??
I could "by" the boat I wanted too.

So why didn't you? Why don't you buy a place with enough space to
store your dreamboat? Why do you need to stay in that congested
city with the polluted harbour, lousy weather, and high crime
rate? You'd be better off emigrating to America. What's the old
saying; "Give us your tired your poor and your hungry". Your
buddy Harry seems to be doing quite well here in spite of the
fact he hates America The Beautiful.

--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Attention, John Herring
 

On 6/20/16 8:33 AM, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:

Say what??
I could "by" the boat I wanted too.


So why didn't you? Why don't you buy a place with enough space to
store your dreamboat?

Why are you questioning an actual boat owner? It's not as if you own a
boat.

Attention, John Herring
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/20/16 8:33 AM, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:

Say what??
I could "by" the boat I wanted too.


So why didn't you? Why don't you buy a place with enough space to
store your dreamboat?

Why are you questioning an actual boat owner? It's not as if you own a
boat.



His boat is most likely as real as your boat.

Attention, John Herring
 

On 6/20/16 2:30 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/20/16 8:33 AM, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:

Say what??
I could "by" the boat I wanted too.


So why didn't you? Why don't you buy a place with enough space to
store your dreamboat?

Why are you questioning an actual boat owner? It's not as if you own a
boat.



His boat is most likely as real as your boat.


You're shooting blanks in the dark, as usual, bilious.

Attention, John Herring
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/20/16 2:30 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/20/16 8:33 AM, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:

Say what??
I could "by" the boat I wanted too.


So why didn't you? Why don't you buy a place with enough space to
store your dreamboat?

Why are you questioning an actual boat owner? It's not as if you own a
boat.



His boat is most likely as real as your boat.


You're shooting blanks in the dark, as usual, bilious.


And your blow smoke as normal.